Setting the stage for plant–soil feedback: Mycorrhizal influences over conspecific recruitment, plant and fungal communities, and coevolution

IF 5.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Andrew C. Eagar, Princess H. Abu, Megan A. Brown, Sara M. Moledor, Kurt A. Smemo, Richard P. Phillips, Andrea L. Case, Christopher B. Blackwood
{"title":"Setting the stage for plant–soil feedback: Mycorrhizal influences over conspecific recruitment, plant and fungal communities, and coevolution","authors":"Andrew C. Eagar, Princess H. Abu, Megan A. Brown, Sara M. Moledor, Kurt A. Smemo, Richard P. Phillips, Andrea L. Case, Christopher B. Blackwood","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.14393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h2>1 INTRODUCTION</h2>\n<p>Global environmental change factors are altering plant community composition worldwide (Franklin et al., <span>2016</span>; Komatsu et al., <span>2019</span>) and consequently changing the soil microbial communities that structure plant–soil interactions (Classen et al., <span>2015</span>; Rudgers et al., <span>2020</span>). While the consequences of shifting species' abundances can be hard to predict, aggregated changes in plant communities often result in shifts in the dominance of plant functional types (e.g. mycorrhizal associations). Examples of shifts in mycorrhizal dominance due to changes in plant community composition are now plentiful: ectomycorrhizal (ECM) and ericoid mycorrhizal (ERM) plants are encroaching into grasslands historically dominated by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) plants (Brandt et al., <span>2013</span>; Coop &amp; Givnish, <span>2007</span>; Singh, <span>2018</span>); AM plants are expanding into ERM-dominant shrubland ecosystems (Tan et al., <span>2019</span>); ECM plants are invading tundra primarily composed of ERM plants (Elmendorf et al., <span>2012</span>; Myers-Smith et al., <span>2011</span>); and the relative dominance of AM versus ECM trees is changing in temperate forests (Jo et al., <span>2019</span>; Steidinger et al., <span>2019</span>). These shifts in plant–mycorrhizal composition point to a critical need to understand how plant–mycorrhizal types affect plant–soil interactions across plant communities, which have the potential to also alter future ecological and evolutionary dynamics.</p>\n<p>Plants influence soil in ways that have reciprocating positive or negative effects on the growth and reproductive success of themselves and other conspecific individuals, such as their offspring—a process known as ‘plant–soil feedback’ (PSF) (Ehrenfeld et al., <span>2005</span>; van der Putten et al., <span>2013</span>). Although abiotic factors can be important in certain cases (e.g. Xu et al., <span>2021</span>), soil microorganisms are recognized as the primary drivers of PSF (Mangan et al., <span>2010</span>; Mills &amp; Bever, <span>1998</span>; van der Putten et al., <span>2013</span>). Plant pathogens and mutualists, including mycorrhizal fungi, contribute directly to feedback by concomitantly increasing or decreasing in abundance with their associated plant populations. Despite PSF being an outcome of complex interactions with multiple components of the plant microbiome, mycorrhizal type has recently emerged as a particularly important determinant of the net result (positive or negative) of PSF (Bennett et al., <span>2017</span>; Delavaux et al., <span>2023</span>; Eagar et al., <span>2020</span>). Most plant species can be categorized into a single mycorrhizal type (e.g. AM, ECM, or ERM; Brundrett &amp; Tedersoo, <span>2018</span>) and plant communities can be characterized by mycorrhizal type dominance on a continuous scale (e.g. ECM tree basal area/total tree basal area). Thus, plant–mycorrhizal associations represent a powerful conceptual model for generalizing PSF effects and outcomes across species and communities.</p>\n<p>In this review, we discuss how predicted shifts in dominant mycorrhizal types under global change affect plant–soil interactions and related plant community dynamics. We begin by synthesizing the underlying mechanisms and drivers of PSF dynamics among plant species based on their mycorrhizal type, specifically contrasting AM systems to ECM and ERM systems due to trait-based differences that distinguish the former group from the latter two. Next, we explore how PSF generated by dominant species of different mycorrhizal types may ‘spill over’ onto co-occurring plant species, thus affecting the strength and direction of their PSF, and how mycorrhizal spillover may influence plant community dynamics as dominance of a community shifts between mycorrhizal types under global change. This concept is similar to existing plant pathogen spillover theory, where some plants can serve as pathogen reservoirs, enhancing the likelihood of disease in other, nearby plants (Gilbert &amp; Parker, <span>2016</span>; Mordecai, <span>2011</span>; Power &amp; Mitchell, <span>2004</span>). However, the mycorrhizal spillover that we propose here focuses on the effects of dominant plant species on a much broader range of microorganisms (including mutualistic and free-living microorganisms) and the soil biogeochemical environment. We also discuss how mycorrhizal type and related spillover effects can influence plant evolution in communities by affecting drivers of PSF that interact with plant traits related to defence and mutualism formation. We conclude by identifying several topics that warrant further research to fully evaluate these mechanisms and the consequences they may have on plant eco-evolutionary dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14393","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1 INTRODUCTION

Global environmental change factors are altering plant community composition worldwide (Franklin et al., 2016; Komatsu et al., 2019) and consequently changing the soil microbial communities that structure plant–soil interactions (Classen et al., 2015; Rudgers et al., 2020). While the consequences of shifting species' abundances can be hard to predict, aggregated changes in plant communities often result in shifts in the dominance of plant functional types (e.g. mycorrhizal associations). Examples of shifts in mycorrhizal dominance due to changes in plant community composition are now plentiful: ectomycorrhizal (ECM) and ericoid mycorrhizal (ERM) plants are encroaching into grasslands historically dominated by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) plants (Brandt et al., 2013; Coop & Givnish, 2007; Singh, 2018); AM plants are expanding into ERM-dominant shrubland ecosystems (Tan et al., 2019); ECM plants are invading tundra primarily composed of ERM plants (Elmendorf et al., 2012; Myers-Smith et al., 2011); and the relative dominance of AM versus ECM trees is changing in temperate forests (Jo et al., 2019; Steidinger et al., 2019). These shifts in plant–mycorrhizal composition point to a critical need to understand how plant–mycorrhizal types affect plant–soil interactions across plant communities, which have the potential to also alter future ecological and evolutionary dynamics.

Plants influence soil in ways that have reciprocating positive or negative effects on the growth and reproductive success of themselves and other conspecific individuals, such as their offspring—a process known as ‘plant–soil feedback’ (PSF) (Ehrenfeld et al., 2005; van der Putten et al., 2013). Although abiotic factors can be important in certain cases (e.g. Xu et al., 2021), soil microorganisms are recognized as the primary drivers of PSF (Mangan et al., 2010; Mills & Bever, 1998; van der Putten et al., 2013). Plant pathogens and mutualists, including mycorrhizal fungi, contribute directly to feedback by concomitantly increasing or decreasing in abundance with their associated plant populations. Despite PSF being an outcome of complex interactions with multiple components of the plant microbiome, mycorrhizal type has recently emerged as a particularly important determinant of the net result (positive or negative) of PSF (Bennett et al., 2017; Delavaux et al., 2023; Eagar et al., 2020). Most plant species can be categorized into a single mycorrhizal type (e.g. AM, ECM, or ERM; Brundrett & Tedersoo, 2018) and plant communities can be characterized by mycorrhizal type dominance on a continuous scale (e.g. ECM tree basal area/total tree basal area). Thus, plant–mycorrhizal associations represent a powerful conceptual model for generalizing PSF effects and outcomes across species and communities.

In this review, we discuss how predicted shifts in dominant mycorrhizal types under global change affect plant–soil interactions and related plant community dynamics. We begin by synthesizing the underlying mechanisms and drivers of PSF dynamics among plant species based on their mycorrhizal type, specifically contrasting AM systems to ECM and ERM systems due to trait-based differences that distinguish the former group from the latter two. Next, we explore how PSF generated by dominant species of different mycorrhizal types may ‘spill over’ onto co-occurring plant species, thus affecting the strength and direction of their PSF, and how mycorrhizal spillover may influence plant community dynamics as dominance of a community shifts between mycorrhizal types under global change. This concept is similar to existing plant pathogen spillover theory, where some plants can serve as pathogen reservoirs, enhancing the likelihood of disease in other, nearby plants (Gilbert & Parker, 2016; Mordecai, 2011; Power & Mitchell, 2004). However, the mycorrhizal spillover that we propose here focuses on the effects of dominant plant species on a much broader range of microorganisms (including mutualistic and free-living microorganisms) and the soil biogeochemical environment. We also discuss how mycorrhizal type and related spillover effects can influence plant evolution in communities by affecting drivers of PSF that interact with plant traits related to defence and mutualism formation. We conclude by identifying several topics that warrant further research to fully evaluate these mechanisms and the consequences they may have on plant eco-evolutionary dynamics.

Abstract Image

为植物-土壤反馈创造条件:菌根对同种生物招募、植物和真菌群落以及共同进化的影响
1 引言 全球环境变化因素正在改变世界各地的植物群落组成(Franklin 等人,2016 年;Komatsu 等人,2019 年),从而改变了构建植物-土壤相互作用的土壤微生物群落(Classen 等人,2015 年;Rudgers 等人,2020 年)。虽然物种丰度变化的后果很难预测,但植物群落的总体变化往往会导致植物功能类型(如菌根结合)的主导地位发生变化。植物群落组成的变化导致菌根优势发生变化的例子现在比比皆是:外生菌根(ECM)和麦角菌根(ERM)植物正在蚕食历史上由丛枝菌根(AM)植物主导的草地(Brandt et al、2013;Coop & Givnish, 2007; Singh, 2018);AM 植物正在向 ERM 植物为主的灌木生态系统扩张(Tan 等人,2019 年);ECM 植物正在入侵主要由 ERM 植物组成的苔原(Elmendorf 等人,2012 年;Myers-Smith 等人,2011 年);在温带森林中,AM 与 ECM 树木的相对优势正在发生变化(Jo 等人,2019 年;Steidinger 等人,2019 年)。植物影响土壤的方式会对其自身及其后代等其他同种个体的生长和繁殖成功产生互惠的积极或消极影响--这一过程被称为 "植物-土壤反馈"(PSF)(Ehrenfeld 等人,2005 年;van der Putten 等人,2013 年)。虽然非生物因素在某些情况下也很重要(如 Xu 等人,2021 年),但土壤微生物被认为是 PSF 的主要驱动力(Mangan 等人,2010 年;Mills & Bever, 1998 年;van der Putten 等人,2013 年)。植物病原体和互生菌(包括菌根真菌)会随着相关植物种群数量的增加或减少而直接产生反馈。尽管 PSF 是与植物微生物群多种成分复杂相互作用的结果,但菌根类型最近已成为 PSF 净结果(正或负)的一个特别重要的决定因素(Bennett 等人,2017 年;Delavaux 等人,2023 年;Eagar 等人,2020 年)。大多数植物物种可归类为单一菌根类型(如 AM、ECM 或 ERM;Brundrett & Tedersoo, 2018),植物群落可根据连续尺度上的菌根类型优势(如 ECM 树木基部面积/总树木基部面积)来表征。因此,植物与菌根的关联是一个强大的概念模型,可用于概括不同物种和群落的 PSF 效应和结果。在本综述中,我们将讨论在全球变化下主导菌根类型的预测变化如何影响植物与土壤的相互作用以及相关的植物群落动态。首先,我们根据植物物种的菌根类型,归纳了PSF动态的基本机制和驱动因素,特别是将AM系统与ECM和ERM系统进行了对比,因为前者与后两者在性状上存在差异。接下来,我们将探讨不同菌根类型的优势物种产生的PSF如何 "溢出 "到共生植物物种上,从而影响其PSF的强度和方向,以及菌根溢出如何影响植物群落动态,因为在全球变化下,群落的优势地位会在不同菌根类型之间发生变化。这一概念类似于现有的植物病原体溢出理论,即一些植物可以作为病原体库,提高附近其他植物发病的可能性(Gilbert & Parker, 2016; Mordecai, 2011; Power & Mitchell, 2004)。然而,我们在此提出的菌根溢出效应侧重于优势植物物种对更广泛的微生物(包括互生和自由生活的微生物)和土壤生物地球化学环境的影响。我们还讨论了菌根类型和相关溢出效应如何通过影响与植物防御和互生关系形成相关的性状相互作用的 PSF 驱动因素,影响群落中的植物进化。最后,我们提出了几个需要进一步研究的课题,以全面评估这些机制及其可能对植物生态进化动态产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ecology
Journal of Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.50%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Ecology publishes original research papers on all aspects of the ecology of plants (including algae), in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. We do not publish papers concerned solely with cultivated plants and agricultural ecosystems. Studies of plant communities, populations or individual species are accepted, as well as studies of the interactions between plants and animals, fungi or bacteria, providing they focus on the ecology of the plants. We aim to bring important work using any ecological approach (including molecular techniques) to a wide international audience and therefore only publish papers with strong and ecological messages that advance our understanding of ecological principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信