Art Notions in the Age of (Mis)anthropic AI

IF 0.3 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Arts Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.3390/arts13050137
Dejan Grba
{"title":"Art Notions in the Age of (Mis)anthropic AI","authors":"Dejan Grba","doi":"10.3390/arts13050137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I take the cultural effects of generative artificial intelligence (generative AI) as a context for examining a broader perspective of AI’s impact on contemporary art notions. After the introductory overview of generative AI, I summarize the distinct but often confused aspects of art notions and review the principal lines in which AI influences them: the strategic normalization of AI through art, the representation of AI art in the artworld, academia, and AI research, and the mutual permeability of art and kitsch in the digital culture. I connect these notional factors with the conceptual and ideological substrate of the computer science and AI industry, which blends the machinic agency fetishism, the equalization of computers and humans, the sociotechnical blindness, and cyberlibertarianism. The overtones of alienation, sociopathy, and misanthropy in the disparate but somehow coalescing philosophical premises, technical ideas, and political views in this substrate remain underexposed in AI studies so, in the closing discussion, I outline their manifestations in generative AI and introduce several viewpoints for a further critique of AI’s cultural zeitgeist. They add a touch of skepticism to pondering how technological trends change our understanding of art and in which directions they stir its social, economic, and political roles.","PeriodicalId":30547,"journal":{"name":"Arts","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/arts13050137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, I take the cultural effects of generative artificial intelligence (generative AI) as a context for examining a broader perspective of AI’s impact on contemporary art notions. After the introductory overview of generative AI, I summarize the distinct but often confused aspects of art notions and review the principal lines in which AI influences them: the strategic normalization of AI through art, the representation of AI art in the artworld, academia, and AI research, and the mutual permeability of art and kitsch in the digital culture. I connect these notional factors with the conceptual and ideological substrate of the computer science and AI industry, which blends the machinic agency fetishism, the equalization of computers and humans, the sociotechnical blindness, and cyberlibertarianism. The overtones of alienation, sociopathy, and misanthropy in the disparate but somehow coalescing philosophical premises, technical ideas, and political views in this substrate remain underexposed in AI studies so, in the closing discussion, I outline their manifestations in generative AI and introduce several viewpoints for a further critique of AI’s cultural zeitgeist. They add a touch of skepticism to pondering how technological trends change our understanding of art and in which directions they stir its social, economic, and political roles.
误)人工智能时代的艺术概念
在本文中,我以生成式人工智能(generative AI)的文化影响为背景,从更广阔的视角审视人工智能对当代艺术观念的影响。在对生成式人工智能进行介绍性概述之后,我总结了艺术观念中截然不同但经常混淆的方面,并回顾了人工智能对其产生影响的主要脉络:通过艺术使人工智能战略正常化,人工智能艺术在艺术界、学术界和人工智能研究中的代表性,以及艺术与媚俗在数字文化中的相互渗透。我将这些概念因素与计算机科学和人工智能产业的概念和意识形态基础联系起来,其中融合了机器代理拜物教、计算机与人类平等化、社会技术盲目性和网络自由主义。在这一基质中,异化、反社会和厌世的色彩虽然各不相同,但在某种程度上却凝聚在哲学前提、技术思想和政治观点之中,这一点在人工智能研究中仍未得到充分揭示,因此,在最后的讨论中,我概述了它们在生成式人工智能中的表现,并介绍了进一步批判人工智能文化思潮的几种观点。它们为我们思考技术趋势如何改变我们对艺术的理解,以及它们在社会、经济和政治角色中的作用增添了一丝怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arts
Arts HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
40.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信