Cholinesterase Inhibitor Initiation Does Not Increase the Risk of Fall-Related Injury in Older Adults Treated with Beta-blockers: a self-controlled case series design

Meghan A Cupp, Sarah D Berry, Kaleen N Hayes, Lori A Daiello, Darae Ko, Melissa R Riester, Andrew R Zullo
{"title":"Cholinesterase Inhibitor Initiation Does Not Increase the Risk of Fall-Related Injury in Older Adults Treated with Beta-blockers: a self-controlled case series design","authors":"Meghan A Cupp, Sarah D Berry, Kaleen N Hayes, Lori A Daiello, Darae Ko, Melissa R Riester, Andrew R Zullo","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glae219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Prescribing cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) concurrently with beta-blockers might cause syncope that increases the risk of fall-related injuries (FRIs). This self-controlled case series study assesses the risk of FRIs associated with initiating ChEIs while receiving beta-blockers among Medicare fee-for-service-insured nursing home (NH) residents in the United States. Methods We identified individuals at their first dispensing of a beta-blocker between 2016 and 2019 after at least 45 days of long-stay NH residency. Individuals were followed from the first day of beta-blocker use until beta-blocker discontinuation, Medicare disenrollment, death, or study end. ChEI initiation was classified as the first 60 days of new ChEI dispensing after 45 days of no ChEI exposure. FRIs were assessed during beta-blocker use periods and age-adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) for ChEI-initiation days versus other days were calculated using conditional Poisson regression models. Analyses were weighted for event-dependent observation periods due to the high risk of mortality after an FRI in this population. Subgroup analyses were conducted for several key time-fixed variables, including sex, age, ChEI type, ChEI dose, beta-blocker selectivity and beta-blocker dose. Results The FRI risk after ChEI initiation was not elevated among 837 residents who experienced an FRI while using beta-blockers (IRR=0.90 [95%CLs 0.71, 1.15]). Analyses of ChEI initiation in several subgroups yielded similar results. Conclusions There was no substantial difference in FRI risk when initiating ChEIs among older NH residents receiving beta-blocker therapy versus periods without ChEI initiation, suggesting that there is no clinically significant pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction between beta-blockers and ChEIs.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Prescribing cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) concurrently with beta-blockers might cause syncope that increases the risk of fall-related injuries (FRIs). This self-controlled case series study assesses the risk of FRIs associated with initiating ChEIs while receiving beta-blockers among Medicare fee-for-service-insured nursing home (NH) residents in the United States. Methods We identified individuals at their first dispensing of a beta-blocker between 2016 and 2019 after at least 45 days of long-stay NH residency. Individuals were followed from the first day of beta-blocker use until beta-blocker discontinuation, Medicare disenrollment, death, or study end. ChEI initiation was classified as the first 60 days of new ChEI dispensing after 45 days of no ChEI exposure. FRIs were assessed during beta-blocker use periods and age-adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) for ChEI-initiation days versus other days were calculated using conditional Poisson regression models. Analyses were weighted for event-dependent observation periods due to the high risk of mortality after an FRI in this population. Subgroup analyses were conducted for several key time-fixed variables, including sex, age, ChEI type, ChEI dose, beta-blocker selectivity and beta-blocker dose. Results The FRI risk after ChEI initiation was not elevated among 837 residents who experienced an FRI while using beta-blockers (IRR=0.90 [95%CLs 0.71, 1.15]). Analyses of ChEI initiation in several subgroups yielded similar results. Conclusions There was no substantial difference in FRI risk when initiating ChEIs among older NH residents receiving beta-blocker therapy versus periods without ChEI initiation, suggesting that there is no clinically significant pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction between beta-blockers and ChEIs.
使用胆碱酯酶抑制剂不会增加使用贝塔受体阻滞剂的老年人发生跌倒相关损伤的风险:一项自我对照的病例系列设计
背景 胆碱酯酶抑制剂(ChEIs)与β-受体阻滞剂同时使用可能会导致晕厥,从而增加跌倒相关伤害(FRIs)的风险。这项自控病例系列研究评估了美国联邦医疗保险付费服务投保的疗养院(NH)住院患者在服用β-受体阻滞剂的同时开始使用胆碱酯酶抑制剂所带来的摔伤风险。方法 我们在 2016 年至 2019 年期间对至少在疗养院长期居住 45 天后首次配发β-受体阻滞剂的患者进行了识别。从使用β-受体阻滞剂的第一天开始对患者进行随访,直到患者停用β-受体阻滞剂、退出医疗保险、死亡或研究结束。开始使用氯电子镇静剂被归类为在 45 天未接触氯电子镇静剂后新配发氯电子镇静剂的前 60 天。在使用β-受体阻滞剂期间对FRI进行评估,并使用条件泊松回归模型计算ChEI启动日与其他日的年龄调整后发病率比(IRR)。由于该人群在 FRI 后的死亡风险较高,因此对依赖于事件的观察期进行了加权分析。针对几个关键的时间固定变量(包括性别、年龄、ChEI 类型、ChEI 剂量、β-受体阻滞剂选择性和β-受体阻滞剂剂量)进行了亚组分析。结果 在使用β-受体阻滞剂期间经历过FRI的837名居民中,开始使用ChEI后的FRI风险并没有升高(IRR=0.90 [95%CLs 0.71, 1.15])。对几个亚组启动 ChEI 的分析结果相似。结论 接受β-受体阻滞剂治疗的老年 NH 居民在开始使用 ChEIs 期间与未开始使用 ChEIs 期间的 FRI 风险没有实质性差异,这表明β-受体阻滞剂与 ChEIs 之间不存在具有临床意义的药效学药物相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信