Health Literacy and Healthcare Seeking with Lung Cancer Symptoms among Individuals with Different Smoking Statuses: A Population-Based Study

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lisa Maria Sele Sætre, Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam, Anna Aaby, Sanne Rasmussen, Jens Søndergaard, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl
{"title":"Health Literacy and Healthcare Seeking with Lung Cancer Symptoms among Individuals with Different Smoking Statuses: A Population-Based Study","authors":"Lisa Maria Sele Sætre,&nbsp;Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam,&nbsp;Anna Aaby,&nbsp;Sanne Rasmussen,&nbsp;Jens Søndergaard,&nbsp;Dorte Ejg Jarbøl","doi":"10.1155/2024/7919967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Objective</i>. To estimate proportions of contacts to the general practitioner (GP) among people with specific and nonspecific lung cancer symptoms, respectively, in the Danish general population and to analyse the associations between health literacy and these contacts based on smoking status. <i>Methods</i>. A total of 67,280 randomly selected individuals aged ≥40 years were invited to a survey concerning symptoms and healthcare seeking. This study included lung cancer symptoms, GP contacts, smoking status, four aspects of health literacy, and socioeconomics. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models were applied. <i>Results</i>. Of 22,055 respondents, 23% reported at least one specific lung cancer symptom, while 47% reported at least one nonspecific symptom. GP contacts ranged from 30% (tiredness) to 60% (shortness of breath). Individuals who currently smoke had lower odds of GP contacts. The health literacy aspect “Feeling understood and supported” increased the likelihood of GP contact, while “Having sufficient information” decreased the likelihood. Smoking status did not modify these associations. <i>Conclusion</i>. Efforts targeting individuals at risk of postponing healthcare seeking with lung cancer symptoms are needed. This study highlights aspects of health literacy that may be addressed in interventions increasing both individuals and community-based health literacy responsiveness and enhanced chances of timely healthcare seeking.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/7919967","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/7919967","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. To estimate proportions of contacts to the general practitioner (GP) among people with specific and nonspecific lung cancer symptoms, respectively, in the Danish general population and to analyse the associations between health literacy and these contacts based on smoking status. Methods. A total of 67,280 randomly selected individuals aged ≥40 years were invited to a survey concerning symptoms and healthcare seeking. This study included lung cancer symptoms, GP contacts, smoking status, four aspects of health literacy, and socioeconomics. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models were applied. Results. Of 22,055 respondents, 23% reported at least one specific lung cancer symptom, while 47% reported at least one nonspecific symptom. GP contacts ranged from 30% (tiredness) to 60% (shortness of breath). Individuals who currently smoke had lower odds of GP contacts. The health literacy aspect “Feeling understood and supported” increased the likelihood of GP contact, while “Having sufficient information” decreased the likelihood. Smoking status did not modify these associations. Conclusion. Efforts targeting individuals at risk of postponing healthcare seeking with lung cancer symptoms are needed. This study highlights aspects of health literacy that may be addressed in interventions increasing both individuals and community-based health literacy responsiveness and enhanced chances of timely healthcare seeking.

Abstract Image

不同吸烟状况人群的健康素养与肺癌症状的就医情况:基于人群的研究
目的估计丹麦普通人群中分别有特异性和非特异性肺癌症状的人与全科医生(GP)联系的比例,并根据吸烟状况分析健康素养与这些联系之间的关联。研究方法随机抽取了 67,280 名年龄≥40 岁的人,邀请他们参加有关症状和就医情况的调查。这项研究包括肺癌症状、全科医生接触情况、吸烟状况、健康素养的四个方面以及社会经济状况。研究采用了描述性统计和多变量逻辑回归模型。结果显示在 22,055 名受访者中,23% 的人报告了至少一种特异性肺癌症状,47% 的人报告了至少一种非特异性症状。与全科医生联系的比例从 30%(疲倦)到 60%(呼吸急促)不等。目前吸烟的人接触全科医生的几率较低。健康素养方面的 "感觉被理解和支持 "增加了联系全科医生的可能性,而 "获得足够的信息 "则降低了联系全科医生的可能性。吸烟状况不会改变这些关联。结论需要针对有肺癌症状而推迟就医风险的人群开展工作。本研究强调了健康素养的一些方面,这些方面可以在干预措施中加以解决,从而提高个人和社区的健康素养响应能力,增加及时就医的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer Care
European Journal of Cancer Care 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of: - Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients - Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care - Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients - Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care - Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members - International perspectives on cancer care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信