When Methodological Innovation Changes the Game: A 10-Year Review of Environmental DNA (eDNA) Applied to Crayfish

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Thomas Baudry, Valentin Vasselon, Carine Delaunay, Michael Sweet, Frédéric Grandjean
{"title":"When Methodological Innovation Changes the Game: A 10-Year Review of Environmental DNA (eDNA) Applied to Crayfish","authors":"Thomas Baudry,&nbsp;Valentin Vasselon,&nbsp;Carine Delaunay,&nbsp;Michael Sweet,&nbsp;Frédéric Grandjean","doi":"10.1002/aqc.4245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) as a tool for monitoring represents a major innovative advance in environmental science, one that enables the detection of species without the need to observe or capture them. This article assesses the state of play of eDNA research targeting crayfish. We found a total of 41 peer-reviewed articles published between 2014 and 2023 on both native and invasive species. Most studies focused on invasive species (or a native/invasive species co-detection assessment) (65.8%). There was also a clear geographical bias across studies, with more than half conducted in Europe (51.2%) and a quarter in the United States (26.8%). In contrast, there were none conducted in Africa. The relatively large number of published studies has led to an interesting diversity of protocols designed or utilized, with most favouring the development of their own assays (69.33%). That said, filtration (as an eDNA capture method) was common (80.5%), along with the use of commercially available eDNA extraction kits (69.8%). The COI gene also appeared to be the preferred target region (89.33%). Such range of protocols is interesting, but is it optimal? Are the best protocols always being utilized? Or is the chance for novel application hampering our ability to explore larger trends across studies?</p>","PeriodicalId":55493,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aqc.4245","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.4245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) as a tool for monitoring represents a major innovative advance in environmental science, one that enables the detection of species without the need to observe or capture them. This article assesses the state of play of eDNA research targeting crayfish. We found a total of 41 peer-reviewed articles published between 2014 and 2023 on both native and invasive species. Most studies focused on invasive species (or a native/invasive species co-detection assessment) (65.8%). There was also a clear geographical bias across studies, with more than half conducted in Europe (51.2%) and a quarter in the United States (26.8%). In contrast, there were none conducted in Africa. The relatively large number of published studies has led to an interesting diversity of protocols designed or utilized, with most favouring the development of their own assays (69.33%). That said, filtration (as an eDNA capture method) was common (80.5%), along with the use of commercially available eDNA extraction kits (69.8%). The COI gene also appeared to be the preferred target region (89.33%). Such range of protocols is interesting, but is it optimal? Are the best protocols always being utilized? Or is the chance for novel application hampering our ability to explore larger trends across studies?

Abstract Image

当方法创新改变游戏规则时:环境 DNA (eDNA) 应用于螯虾的 10 年回顾
使用环境 DNA(eDNA)作为监测工具是环境科学的一大创新进步,无需观察或捕捉就能检测物种。本文评估了针对小龙虾的 eDNA 研究现状。我们发现,在2014年至2023年期间,共发表了41篇关于本地物种和入侵物种的同行评审文章。大多数研究侧重于入侵物种(或本地/入侵物种共同检测评估)(65.8%)。这些研究还存在明显的地域偏差,一半以上的研究在欧洲进行(51.2%),四分之一的研究在美国进行(26.8%)。相比之下,没有一项研究是在非洲进行的。由于发表的研究数量相对较多,因此设计或使用的方案也呈现出有趣的多样性,大多数研究都倾向于开发自己的检测方法(69.33%)。尽管如此,过滤(作为一种 eDNA 捕获方法)以及使用市售 eDNA 提取试剂盒(69.8%)也很常见(80.5%)。COI 基因似乎也是首选的目标区域(89.33%)。这样的方案范围很有意思,但它是最佳方案吗?最佳方案是否总能得到利用?或者说,新颖应用的机会是否阻碍了我们探索不同研究间更大趋势的能力?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems is an international journal dedicated to publishing original papers that relate specifically to freshwater, brackish or marine habitats and encouraging work that spans these ecosystems. This journal provides a forum in which all aspects of the conservation of aquatic biological resources can be presented and discussed, enabling greater cooperation and efficiency in solving problems in aquatic resource conservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信