Andrey G. Zuev , Ivan V. Gruzdev , Anton M. Potapov , Ina Schaefer , Stefan Scheu , Alexei V. Tiunov , Nguyen Van Thinh , Anna I. Zueva
{"title":"Assessing extraradical mycelium of mycorrhizal fungi in tropical forests using armored in-growth mesh bags","authors":"Andrey G. Zuev , Ivan V. Gruzdev , Anton M. Potapov , Ina Schaefer , Stefan Scheu , Alexei V. Tiunov , Nguyen Van Thinh , Anna I. Zueva","doi":"10.1016/j.pedobi.2024.150989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The extraradical mycelium of mycorrhizal fungi is among the major carbon pools in soil that is hard to quantitatively assess in-situ. Established method of in-growth mesh bags in temperate ecosystems is difficult to apply in the tropics, where mesh bags are often damaged by termites. Here we introduce a modification of the in-growth mesh bag technique, in which mesh bags are enforced by stainless steel mesh. Its performance was tested in the Đồng Nai (Cát Tiên) National Park in Vietnam across two monsoon tropical forests, dominated by tree species associated with either ectomycorrhizal (ECM) or arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. Armored in-growth mesh bags remained intact, while about 60 % of non-armored mesh bags were damaged by termites after 180 days of exposure. The biomass of extraradical mycelium of ectomycorrhizal fungi estimated by PLFA analysis was similar in the armored and non-armored mesh bags and did not differ between studied forests. However, fungal community composition slightly differed between armored and non-armored mesh bags in the ECM- but not in the AM-dominated forest. Fungal mycelium gathered in the AM-dominated forest was depleted in <sup>15</sup>N compared to that collected in the ECM-dominated forest. Overall, our results argue for using armored mesh bags as a robust tool for harvesting the biomass of extraradical mycelium of mycorrhizal fungi in tropical ecosystems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49711,"journal":{"name":"Pedobiologia","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 150989"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031405624035108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The extraradical mycelium of mycorrhizal fungi is among the major carbon pools in soil that is hard to quantitatively assess in-situ. Established method of in-growth mesh bags in temperate ecosystems is difficult to apply in the tropics, where mesh bags are often damaged by termites. Here we introduce a modification of the in-growth mesh bag technique, in which mesh bags are enforced by stainless steel mesh. Its performance was tested in the Đồng Nai (Cát Tiên) National Park in Vietnam across two monsoon tropical forests, dominated by tree species associated with either ectomycorrhizal (ECM) or arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. Armored in-growth mesh bags remained intact, while about 60 % of non-armored mesh bags were damaged by termites after 180 days of exposure. The biomass of extraradical mycelium of ectomycorrhizal fungi estimated by PLFA analysis was similar in the armored and non-armored mesh bags and did not differ between studied forests. However, fungal community composition slightly differed between armored and non-armored mesh bags in the ECM- but not in the AM-dominated forest. Fungal mycelium gathered in the AM-dominated forest was depleted in 15N compared to that collected in the ECM-dominated forest. Overall, our results argue for using armored mesh bags as a robust tool for harvesting the biomass of extraradical mycelium of mycorrhizal fungi in tropical ecosystems.
期刊介绍:
Pedobiologia publishes peer reviewed articles describing original work in the field of soil ecology, which includes the study of soil organisms and their interactions with factors in their biotic and abiotic environments.
Analysis of biological structures, interactions, functions, and processes in soil is fundamental for understanding the dynamical nature of terrestrial ecosystems, a prerequisite for appropriate soil management. The scope of this journal consists of fundamental and applied aspects of soil ecology; key focal points include interactions among organisms in soil, organismal controls on soil processes, causes and consequences of soil biodiversity, and aboveground-belowground interactions.
We publish:
original research that tests clearly defined hypotheses addressing topics of current interest in soil ecology (including studies demonstrating nonsignificant effects);
descriptions of novel methodological approaches, or evaluations of current approaches, that address a clear need in soil ecology research;
innovative syntheses of the soil ecology literature, including metaanalyses, topical in depth reviews and short opinion/perspective pieces, and descriptions of original conceptual frameworks; and
short notes reporting novel observations of ecological significance.