Exploration and mining of lateritic gold (Part II): Resource estimation, geometallurgy and environmental considerations

IF 3.2 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOLOGY
{"title":"Exploration and mining of lateritic gold (Part II): Resource estimation, geometallurgy and environmental considerations","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.106207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the resource evaluation and processing of gold in the ferruginous gravels and duricrust (FGD) deposits, encompassing lateritic residuum or similar ferricrete. Evaluating lateritic gold deposits presents significant challenges, leading to variability and bias in results, particularly in the low-grade ranges that often characterize these deposits. The surveyed technical reports reveal that FGD deposits generally contribute less than 10% to total deposit resources, comprising only about 5 wt% of their total gold content. Limited exploration in lateritic domains may underestimate the size and grade of gold deposits in the lateritic environment. Expanding the number of drill holes over larger areas can yield significantly higher resource estimates than those derived from restricting exploration to zones directly above the primary mineralization. Of the 63 projects surveyed for this study, 45% defined a lateritic domain, yet only 30% progressed to the resource evaluation phase. Discrimination of domains improves resource estimates and significantly impacts mining operations, notably enhancing metallurgical recovery. Bulk cyanidation tests indicate that rapid leaching kinetics contribute to high gold extractions (95–97%) in lateritic samples. While gravimetric gold recoveries are lower for FGD deposits and oxidized materials than transition and sulphide domains, the opposite is observed in leaching. This behavior is likely due to greater cyanide accessibility and the morphology of secondary gold grains. Operating costs for lateritic deposits are lower than those for primary mineralization, despite variability in mining costs. Processing costs for lateritic gold projects are generally similar, regardless of the apparent compositional differences. From an environmental perspective, lateritic projects with low stripping ratios and increased rock friability may have smaller carbon footprints. However, uncertainties arise in the water footprint due to clay-rich tailings’ potential for non-recoverable water consumption. The analysis of public reporting of lateritic deposits shows a need for more rigor in characterizing and evaluating these deposits. Most mining operations on weathered ores require more detailed studies to ensure good practices and international quality standards. Therefore, a revised model for lateritic gold deposits with a new perspective, including in their technological, economic, and environmental settings, based on operational sustainability thinking, is required for the global gold mining industry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19644,"journal":{"name":"Ore Geology Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169136824003408/pdfft?md5=7b7a25a24e27432f42e5c6fcd06135e4&pid=1-s2.0-S0169136824003408-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ore Geology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169136824003408","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the resource evaluation and processing of gold in the ferruginous gravels and duricrust (FGD) deposits, encompassing lateritic residuum or similar ferricrete. Evaluating lateritic gold deposits presents significant challenges, leading to variability and bias in results, particularly in the low-grade ranges that often characterize these deposits. The surveyed technical reports reveal that FGD deposits generally contribute less than 10% to total deposit resources, comprising only about 5 wt% of their total gold content. Limited exploration in lateritic domains may underestimate the size and grade of gold deposits in the lateritic environment. Expanding the number of drill holes over larger areas can yield significantly higher resource estimates than those derived from restricting exploration to zones directly above the primary mineralization. Of the 63 projects surveyed for this study, 45% defined a lateritic domain, yet only 30% progressed to the resource evaluation phase. Discrimination of domains improves resource estimates and significantly impacts mining operations, notably enhancing metallurgical recovery. Bulk cyanidation tests indicate that rapid leaching kinetics contribute to high gold extractions (95–97%) in lateritic samples. While gravimetric gold recoveries are lower for FGD deposits and oxidized materials than transition and sulphide domains, the opposite is observed in leaching. This behavior is likely due to greater cyanide accessibility and the morphology of secondary gold grains. Operating costs for lateritic deposits are lower than those for primary mineralization, despite variability in mining costs. Processing costs for lateritic gold projects are generally similar, regardless of the apparent compositional differences. From an environmental perspective, lateritic projects with low stripping ratios and increased rock friability may have smaller carbon footprints. However, uncertainties arise in the water footprint due to clay-rich tailings’ potential for non-recoverable water consumption. The analysis of public reporting of lateritic deposits shows a need for more rigor in characterizing and evaluating these deposits. Most mining operations on weathered ores require more detailed studies to ensure good practices and international quality standards. Therefore, a revised model for lateritic gold deposits with a new perspective, including in their technological, economic, and environmental settings, based on operational sustainability thinking, is required for the global gold mining industry.

Abstract Image

红土金矿的勘探和开采(第二部分):资源评估、地质冶金学和环境考虑因素
本研究探讨了铁砾岩和硬壳岩(FGD)矿床(包括红土残积物或类似的铁矿石)中金的资源评估和加工。对红土金矿床进行评估是一项重大挑战,会导致结果的多变性和偏差,特别是在低品位范围内,这些矿床通常具有这种特征。所调查的技术报告显示,烟气脱硫矿床在矿床资源总量中所占比例一般不到 10%,仅占总含金量的约 5%。红土地区有限的勘探可能低估了红土环境中金矿床的规模和品位。在更大的区域内扩大钻孔数量,所获得的资源量估算值会比仅限于原生矿化物正上方区域的勘探值高得多。在本研究调查的 63 个项目中,45% 的项目界定了红土矿域,但只有 30% 的项目进入了资源评估阶段。红土矿区的识别提高了资源估算,并对采矿作业产生了重大影响,尤其是提高了冶金回收率。大量氰化测试表明,快速浸出动力学有助于提高红土样本的金提取率(95-97%)。虽然 FGD 矿床和氧化物的重量金回收率低于过渡和硫化物矿床,但在浸出过程中却观察到了相反的情况。出现这种情况的原因可能是氰化物的可及性和次生金粒的形态。尽管开采成本存在差异,但红土矿床的运营成本低于原生矿化物的运营成本。红土型金矿项目的加工成本一般相似,而不考虑明显的成分差异。从环境角度来看,剥采比低、岩石易碎性高的红土项目可能会有较小的碳足迹。然而,由于富含粘土的尾矿可能会消耗不可回收的水,因此水足迹方面会出现不确定性。对红土矿床公开报告的分析表明,在描述和评估这些矿床时需要更加严格。大多数风化矿石的采矿作业都需要更详细的研究,以确保良好的操作规范和国际质量标准。因此,全球金矿开采业需要以可持续运营思维为基础,从技术、经济和环境等新角度修订红土金矿床模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ore Geology Reviews
Ore Geology Reviews 地学-地质学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
27.30%
发文量
546
审稿时长
22.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Ore Geology Reviews aims to familiarize all earth scientists with recent advances in a number of interconnected disciplines related to the study of, and search for, ore deposits. The reviews range from brief to longer contributions, but the journal preferentially publishes manuscripts that fill the niche between the commonly shorter journal articles and the comprehensive book coverages, and thus has a special appeal to many authors and readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信