Optimization of liquefaction cycles applied to CO2 coming from onshore pipeline to offshore ship transportation

{"title":"Optimization of liquefaction cycles applied to CO2 coming from onshore pipeline to offshore ship transportation","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ccst.2024.100280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the field of the CO<sub>2</sub> transportation for the Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) process chain, several analyses show that, for a large-scale CO<sub>2</sub> transportation, pipeline transportation is the preferred method on land due to its lower cost. Barges also present a feasible alternative if the capture site is near a waterway. Maritime transport becomes more advantageous than pipelines, particularly over long distances and across ocean. Despite the need to liquefy CO<sub>2</sub> and to add temporary storage facilities for loading and unloading onto ships, beyond a certain distance at fixed CO<sub>2</sub> transported and plant life, ship transport optimal at pressures of 7 or 15 bar depending on the type of vessel. Impurities in CO<sub>2</sub>, arising from various industrial processes and variable performances of capture technologies, increase energy consumption during compression and could cause corrosion risks. Specifications for CO<sub>2</sub> ship transport limit the concentration of certain impurities with strict thresholds. Methods for purifying CO<sub>2</sub>, such as the two-flash system and stripping column, have been proposed to meet these specifications. The studied CO<sub>2</sub> liquefaction methods show that hybrid cycles, combining open cycle with Joule-Thompson expansion and closed cycle with cooling machine offer reduced energy consumption and improved CO<sub>2</sub> recovery compared to open or closed cycles. In the presence of the maximum threshold of impurities in the pipeline, energy consumption can nearly double from 21.8 kWh/t<sub>CO</sub><sub>2</sub> to 40.9 kWh/t<sub>CO</sub><sub>2</sub>, with the highest recovery rising 98.1 %. This research underscores the importance of optimizing CO<sub>2</sub> transport strategies to facilitate the deployment of CCUS technologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9387,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Capture Science & Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772656824000927/pdfft?md5=6c375e09275c5cc9e9ff5fa74a958a3b&pid=1-s2.0-S2772656824000927-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Capture Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772656824000927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the field of the CO2 transportation for the Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) process chain, several analyses show that, for a large-scale CO2 transportation, pipeline transportation is the preferred method on land due to its lower cost. Barges also present a feasible alternative if the capture site is near a waterway. Maritime transport becomes more advantageous than pipelines, particularly over long distances and across ocean. Despite the need to liquefy CO2 and to add temporary storage facilities for loading and unloading onto ships, beyond a certain distance at fixed CO2 transported and plant life, ship transport optimal at pressures of 7 or 15 bar depending on the type of vessel. Impurities in CO2, arising from various industrial processes and variable performances of capture technologies, increase energy consumption during compression and could cause corrosion risks. Specifications for CO2 ship transport limit the concentration of certain impurities with strict thresholds. Methods for purifying CO2, such as the two-flash system and stripping column, have been proposed to meet these specifications. The studied CO2 liquefaction methods show that hybrid cycles, combining open cycle with Joule-Thompson expansion and closed cycle with cooling machine offer reduced energy consumption and improved CO2 recovery compared to open or closed cycles. In the presence of the maximum threshold of impurities in the pipeline, energy consumption can nearly double from 21.8 kWh/tCO2 to 40.9 kWh/tCO2, with the highest recovery rising 98.1 %. This research underscores the importance of optimizing CO2 transport strategies to facilitate the deployment of CCUS technologies.

优化从陆上管道到近海船舶运输的二氧化碳的液化周期
在碳捕集、利用和封存(CCUS)工艺链的二氧化碳运输领域,多项分析表明,对于大规模二氧化碳运输而言,陆上管道运输因其成本较低而成为首选方法。如果捕集地点靠近水道,驳船也是一种可行的替代方法。海运比管道运输更有优势,尤其是长距离和跨洋运输。尽管需要将二氧化碳液化并增加临时储存设施以便装卸到船上,但在固定的二氧化碳运输距离和工厂寿命范围内,船舶运输的最佳压力为 7 或 15 巴,具体取决于船舶类型。二氧化碳中的杂质来自各种工业流程和不同性能的捕获技术,会增加压缩过程中的能耗,并可能造成腐蚀风险。二氧化碳船舶运输规范对某些杂质的浓度有严格的限制。为了满足这些要求,人们提出了净化二氧化碳的方法,如双闪系统和汽提塔。所研究的二氧化碳液化方法表明,与开式或闭式循环相比,将开式循环与焦耳-汤普森膨胀相结合以及将闭式循环与冷却机相结合的混合循环可降低能耗,提高二氧化碳回收率。在管道中的杂质达到最大阈值的情况下,能耗几乎翻了一番,从 21.8 kWh/tCO2 增加到 40.9 kWh/tCO2,最高回收率上升了 98.1%。这项研究强调了优化二氧化碳运输战略以促进 CCUS 技术应用的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信