Influence of new tools to increase the rate of influenza vaccination in patients considered at risk during the campaigns of 2019, 2020 and 2021

Beatriz Santos López , Mónica López Campos , Carmen Viñas Viamonte , Paula Aragón Puig , Elena Buades Pérez , Inés Loreto Gallán Farina
{"title":"Influence of new tools to increase the rate of influenza vaccination in patients considered at risk during the campaigns of 2019, 2020 and 2021","authors":"Beatriz Santos López ,&nbsp;Mónica López Campos ,&nbsp;Carmen Viñas Viamonte ,&nbsp;Paula Aragón Puig ,&nbsp;Elena Buades Pérez ,&nbsp;Inés Loreto Gallán Farina","doi":"10.1016/j.vacune.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Influenza infection is a significant public health issue that causes substantial morbidity and mortality in the population every year. Vaccination is the most effective measure for its prevention. The aim of this study is to analyse the influence of automated letters as a patient recruitment method after their discontinuation in a population where they were previously used, comparing it with the population of another healthcare centre with similar characteristics that has never employed this method.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>An observational and retrospective study was conducted, analysing the influenza vaccination coverage among the at-risk population in 2 healthcare centres with very similar population characteristics during 3 vaccination campaigns (2019, 2020, and 2021). Both descriptive and analytical studies were carried out.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Vaccination rates in the centre that actively recruited patients while the letter sending was still in effect were 46.4% in 2019 and 61% in 2020, decreasing to 25.8% in 2021 after its withdrawal (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001). Influenza vaccination was significantly higher during the 3 campaigns at the health centre that used the letter. The groups in which vaccination rates decreased most significantly were those aged 65 and older and those with heart disease.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The implementation of automated letters has proven to be particularly effective among patients considered at risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101272,"journal":{"name":"Vacunas (English Edition)","volume":"25 3","pages":"Pages 340-346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vacunas (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2445146024000517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Influenza infection is a significant public health issue that causes substantial morbidity and mortality in the population every year. Vaccination is the most effective measure for its prevention. The aim of this study is to analyse the influence of automated letters as a patient recruitment method after their discontinuation in a population where they were previously used, comparing it with the population of another healthcare centre with similar characteristics that has never employed this method.

Materials and methods

An observational and retrospective study was conducted, analysing the influenza vaccination coverage among the at-risk population in 2 healthcare centres with very similar population characteristics during 3 vaccination campaigns (2019, 2020, and 2021). Both descriptive and analytical studies were carried out.

Results

Vaccination rates in the centre that actively recruited patients while the letter sending was still in effect were 46.4% in 2019 and 61% in 2020, decreasing to 25.8% in 2021 after its withdrawal (p < .001). Influenza vaccination was significantly higher during the 3 campaigns at the health centre that used the letter. The groups in which vaccination rates decreased most significantly were those aged 65 and older and those with heart disease.

Conclusions

The implementation of automated letters has proven to be particularly effective among patients considered at risk.

在 2019 年、2020 年和 2021 年活动期间,利用新工具提高高危患者的流感疫苗接种率
导言流感感染是一个重大的公共卫生问题,每年都会导致大量人口发病和死亡。接种疫苗是预防流感的最有效措施。本研究的目的是分析自动信函作为一种患者招募方法在以前使用过的人群中停止使用后所产生的影响,并将其与另一个具有类似特征但从未使用过该方法的医疗保健中心的人群进行比较。材料和方法进行了一项观察性和回顾性研究,分析了在 3 次疫苗接种活动(2019 年、2020 年和 2021 年)期间,人口特征非常相似的两个医疗保健中心的高危人群的流感疫苗接种覆盖率。结果2019 年和 2020 年,在信件发送仍有效期间积极招募患者的中心的接种率分别为 46.4%和 61%,在信件发送取消后,2021 年的接种率降至 25.8%(p <.001)。在使用信件的医疗中心,流感疫苗接种率在三次接种活动中都明显较高。疫苗接种率下降最明显的群体是 65 岁及以上人群和心脏病患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信