Microclimate and thermal refuge influences on sage-grouse brood habitat selection

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Tyler D. Dungannon , Christopher R. Anthony , Timothy S. Bowden , Christian A. Hagen
{"title":"Microclimate and thermal refuge influences on sage-grouse brood habitat selection","authors":"Tyler D. Dungannon ,&nbsp;Christopher R. Anthony ,&nbsp;Timothy S. Bowden ,&nbsp;Christian A. Hagen","doi":"10.1016/j.jtherbio.2024.103957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Wildlife space use is driven by three primary mechanisms, predator avoidance, foraging, and thermoregulation. The latter has largely been overlooked in wildlife research. Understanding how habitat use is influenced by thermoregulatory properties is a critical component to depicting species' ecology. Galliformes’ (i.e., ground nesting birds with precocial young) ecology is predisposed to thermal extremes, where newly hatched chicks are unable to thermoregulate &lt;14 d post-hatch, and have limited capabilities until &gt;21 d post-hatch. We examined greater sage-grouse (<em>Centrocercus urophasianus</em>) brood rearing habitats and provide the first evaluation as to how microscale thermal environments influenced habitat selection. We monitored 24 broods, collected 82,929 black bulb temperature measurements from thermal arrays (n = 256) comprised of stainless steel black bulbs (i.e., surrogate for operative temperature) to compare brood morning (i.e., foraging, n = 78), afternoon (i.e., loafing, n = 82) and associated random locations (n = 96) between early (≤21 d post-hatch) and late (&gt;21 d post-hatch) brood-rearing. We measured vegetation at all locations to disentangle relationships between cover and thermoregulatory metrics. We found that microclimates at all foraging locations heated more rapidly than either their loafing or random locations. Alternatively, loafing locations moderated ambient temperature more effectively than foraging locations but were similar to random locations. Broods were using loafing sites that both increased their ability to avoid predators (i.e., increased shrub structure) and buffered ambient temperature better than their foraging locations. Interestingly, random afternoon locations tended to lack concealment from predators, despite these locations showing improved thermal buffering compared to foraging locations. However, early brood-rearing habitats appeared to moderate ambient temperatures more effectively than late. Our results suggested that managing vegetation for structural heterogeneity will afford a diversity of thermal refuge for greater sage-grouse broods during this critical life history stage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030645652400175X/pdfft?md5=174b82373e1221d9493e8a4d689995a9&pid=1-s2.0-S030645652400175X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030645652400175X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wildlife space use is driven by three primary mechanisms, predator avoidance, foraging, and thermoregulation. The latter has largely been overlooked in wildlife research. Understanding how habitat use is influenced by thermoregulatory properties is a critical component to depicting species' ecology. Galliformes’ (i.e., ground nesting birds with precocial young) ecology is predisposed to thermal extremes, where newly hatched chicks are unable to thermoregulate <14 d post-hatch, and have limited capabilities until >21 d post-hatch. We examined greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) brood rearing habitats and provide the first evaluation as to how microscale thermal environments influenced habitat selection. We monitored 24 broods, collected 82,929 black bulb temperature measurements from thermal arrays (n = 256) comprised of stainless steel black bulbs (i.e., surrogate for operative temperature) to compare brood morning (i.e., foraging, n = 78), afternoon (i.e., loafing, n = 82) and associated random locations (n = 96) between early (≤21 d post-hatch) and late (>21 d post-hatch) brood-rearing. We measured vegetation at all locations to disentangle relationships between cover and thermoregulatory metrics. We found that microclimates at all foraging locations heated more rapidly than either their loafing or random locations. Alternatively, loafing locations moderated ambient temperature more effectively than foraging locations but were similar to random locations. Broods were using loafing sites that both increased their ability to avoid predators (i.e., increased shrub structure) and buffered ambient temperature better than their foraging locations. Interestingly, random afternoon locations tended to lack concealment from predators, despite these locations showing improved thermal buffering compared to foraging locations. However, early brood-rearing habitats appeared to moderate ambient temperatures more effectively than late. Our results suggested that managing vegetation for structural heterogeneity will afford a diversity of thermal refuge for greater sage-grouse broods during this critical life history stage.

小气候和热庇护所对鼠尾草育雏栖息地选择的影响
野生动物的空间利用主要受三种机制驱动,即躲避捕食者、觅食和体温调节。在野生动物研究中,后者在很大程度上被忽视了。了解栖息地的利用如何受到体温调节特性的影响是描述物种生态学的一个关键组成部分。胆形目(即有初生幼鸟的地面筑巢鸟类)的生态环境容易受到极端热量的影响,刚孵化的雏鸟在孵化后14天内无法进行体温调节,孵化后21天内的体温调节能力有限。我们考察了大鼠(Centrocercus urophasianus)的育雏栖息地,并首次评估了微观热环境如何影响栖息地的选择。我们监测了24窝育雏,从由不锈钢黑球(即工作温度的替代物)组成的热阵列(n = 256)中收集了82929个黑球温度测量值,以比较育雏早期(孵化后≤21 d)和育雏晚期(孵化后21 d)上午(即觅食,n = 78)、下午(即闲逛,n = 82)和相关随机地点(n = 96)的育雏情况。我们对所有地点的植被进行了测量,以厘清覆盖度与体温调节指标之间的关系。我们发现,所有觅食地点的微气候都比其闲逛地点或随机地点升温更快。另外,闲逛地点比觅食地点能更有效地调节环境温度,但与随机地点相似。与觅食地点相比,雏鸟使用的闲逛地点既能提高它们躲避捕食者的能力(即增加灌木结构),又能更好地缓冲环境温度。有趣的是,尽管与觅食地点相比,午后随机地点的热缓冲能力更强,但这些地点往往缺乏躲避捕食者的隐蔽性。不过,早期育雏栖息地似乎比晚期育雏栖息地更能有效地缓和环境温度。我们的研究结果表明,对植被进行结构异质性管理将在这一关键的生活史阶段为大鼠育雏提供多种热庇护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信