Human physiological responses to different types of human-dog interactions: A randomised crossover study

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Lene Høeg Fuglsang-Damgaard , Sigrid Juhl Lunde , Janne Winther Christensen , Lene Vase , Poul B. Videbech , Karen Thodberg
{"title":"Human physiological responses to different types of human-dog interactions: A randomised crossover study","authors":"Lene Høeg Fuglsang-Damgaard ,&nbsp;Sigrid Juhl Lunde ,&nbsp;Janne Winther Christensen ,&nbsp;Lene Vase ,&nbsp;Poul B. Videbech ,&nbsp;Karen Thodberg","doi":"10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous studies of human-dog interventions vary in terms of type of interaction, which is rarely quantified, leading to contradictory findings and limited comparability. To uncover the influence of different types of interactions, the present study investigated if it was possible to detect differences in immediate physiological measurements of healthy humans during different standardised types of interaction with a dog. Thirty-three healthy participants (women = 25, men = 8, &gt;18 years) were exposed to four different test situations with standardised types of interaction intensity with a dog in random order: no dog present (CONTROL), looking at a dog (VISUAL), petting a dog (TACTILE) or performing tricks with a dog (ACTIVE). Each test situation lasted 10 min with a 30-min break between each. Heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV) and skin conductance (tonic level (SCL) and peak counts (SCR)) were continuously recorded. Blood pressure (BP) and salivary cortisol (s-cortisol) were measured before and after each test situation. Linear Mixed Models were applied. HR, HRV, BP, SCL and SCR increased with increased interaction with the dog (for all: p &lt; 0.001). HRV increased with decreased HR (p = 0.002), increased SCL (p = 0.027), and SCR (p &lt; 0.001) depending on the type of interaction. Generally, s-cortisol increased with increased HR (p = 0.042), SCL increased with increased SCR (p &lt; 0.001), and SCR increased with increased HRV (p = 0.013), depending on type of interaction. The physiological measurements HR, HRV, BP, SCL and SCR are influenced by different types of dog interaction, and thus it is important to quantify and report the type of interaction in human-dog interaction studies. (<span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> ID:NCT04696419).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48752,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101899"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388124000720/pdfft?md5=910fa5da2fb265b5ee0127b43925fb97&pid=1-s2.0-S1744388124000720-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388124000720","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies of human-dog interventions vary in terms of type of interaction, which is rarely quantified, leading to contradictory findings and limited comparability. To uncover the influence of different types of interactions, the present study investigated if it was possible to detect differences in immediate physiological measurements of healthy humans during different standardised types of interaction with a dog. Thirty-three healthy participants (women = 25, men = 8, >18 years) were exposed to four different test situations with standardised types of interaction intensity with a dog in random order: no dog present (CONTROL), looking at a dog (VISUAL), petting a dog (TACTILE) or performing tricks with a dog (ACTIVE). Each test situation lasted 10 min with a 30-min break between each. Heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV) and skin conductance (tonic level (SCL) and peak counts (SCR)) were continuously recorded. Blood pressure (BP) and salivary cortisol (s-cortisol) were measured before and after each test situation. Linear Mixed Models were applied. HR, HRV, BP, SCL and SCR increased with increased interaction with the dog (for all: p < 0.001). HRV increased with decreased HR (p = 0.002), increased SCL (p = 0.027), and SCR (p < 0.001) depending on the type of interaction. Generally, s-cortisol increased with increased HR (p = 0.042), SCL increased with increased SCR (p < 0.001), and SCR increased with increased HRV (p = 0.013), depending on type of interaction. The physiological measurements HR, HRV, BP, SCL and SCR are influenced by different types of dog interaction, and thus it is important to quantify and report the type of interaction in human-dog interaction studies. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT04696419).

人类对不同类型人狗互动的生理反应:随机交叉研究
以往关于人狗互动的研究在互动类型方面各不相同,很少进行量化,导致研究结果相互矛盾,可比性有限。为了揭示不同类型互动的影响,本研究调查了在与狗进行不同类型的标准化互动过程中,健康人的即时生理测量值是否存在差异。33 名健康参与者(女性 25 人,男性 8 人,18 岁)被随机安排在四种不同的测试情境中,与狗进行标准化类型的互动:无狗(控制)、看狗(视觉)、抚摸狗(触觉)或与狗表演技巧(活动)。每个测试情境持续 10 分钟,中间休息 30 分钟。连续记录心率(HR)、心率变异性(HRV)和皮肤电导(强直水平(SCL)和峰值计数(SCR))。在每次测试前后测量血压(BP)和唾液皮质醇(s-cortisol)。采用线性混合模型。心率、心率变异、血压、SCL 和 SCR 随与狗的互动增加而增加(全部:p < 0.001)。心率变异随心率降低(p = 0.002)、SCL 增加(p = 0.027)和 SCR 增加(p < 0.001)而增加,这取决于交互作用的类型。一般来说,s-皮质醇随心率增加而增加(p = 0.042),SCL随SCR增加而增加(p < 0.001),SCR随心率变异增加而增加(p = 0.013),这取决于交互作用的类型。生理测量指标心率、心率变异、血压、SCL 和 SCR 受不同类型的狗互动影响,因此在人狗互动研究中量化和报告互动类型非常重要。(ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT04696419)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
157
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice is an internationally refereed journal published to meet the broad ranging needs of the healthcare profession in the effective and professional integration of complementary therapies within clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice aims to provide rigorous peer reviewed papers addressing research, implementation of complementary therapies (CTs) in the clinical setting, legal and ethical concerns, evaluative accounts of therapy in practice, philosophical analysis of emergent social trends in CTs, excellence in clinical judgement, best practice, problem management, therapy information, policy development and management of change in order to promote safe and efficacious clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice welcomes and considers accounts of reflective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信