Unveiling workplace safety and health empowerment: Unraveling the key elements influencing occupational injuries

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Mohammed Said Obeidat, Hala Qasim Dweiri, Hazem Jamil Smadi
{"title":"Unveiling workplace safety and health empowerment: Unraveling the key elements influencing occupational injuries","authors":"Mohammed Said Obeidat,&nbsp;Hala Qasim Dweiri,&nbsp;Hazem Jamil Smadi","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> Millions of workers globally experience work-related injuries, leading to fatalities, injuries, job loss, and wider societal implications. This study utilizes both the U.S. database and the General Social Survey (GSS) to delve into the factors linked to occupational injuries. <em>Methods:</em> In this study, 30 questions from the GSS between 2002 and 2014 were used. The sample included 5,914 workers from various sectors, distributed between both female and male, and were of 18 years and above. The analysis encompasses several dimensions: demographics, job-related characteristics, administrative factors, and health and safety measures. The study particularly focuses on assessing the prevalence of three common work-related injuries: nonfatal injuries, back pain and arm pain. Logistic regression models were constructed to gauge the effects of identified factors. <em>Results:</em> Significant insights emerge from the analysis. Factors such as age, gender, race, working hours, overtime work, trust in management, coworker support, and workflow smoothness were identified as having notable impacts on work-related injuries. For each model, the study quantifies these impacts through odds ratio and relative effects. For example, in the nonfatal injuries model, the relative effects of age showed that workers aged 65 years or older experience a 2.56% decrease in the frequency of nonfatal injuries compared to younger workers. Furthermore, in the back pain model, the estimated odds of having back pain in males are 0.90 lower than that in females. Moreover, in the arm pain model, workers who have sufficient time to complete their tasks have estimated odds of experiencing arm pain that are 0.85 lower than those who don’t have adequate time, etc. <em>Conclusions:</em> Understanding the intricate interplay of various factors influencing workers’ safety and health is vital for addressing occupational injuries. By addressing these factors, there’s potential for reducing work-related injuries, enhancing work environment, and minimizing costs. <em>Practical Applications:</em> Organizations can use the study’s findings for reducing work related injuries. Flexible work arrangements, tailored training programs, and ergonomic improvements might highlight factors such as age, gender, and working hours. Enhancing communication, fostering a positive work culture, and prioritizing safety and health measures could reduce risks associated with trusting management and coworker support. Cost-benefit analysis and continuous monitoring ensure these interventions’ effectiveness, reduce back and hand pain incidents, minimize cost, and create safer workplaces, thereby boosting the overall well-being of workers and organizational success.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"91 ","pages":"Pages 126-135"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524001087","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Millions of workers globally experience work-related injuries, leading to fatalities, injuries, job loss, and wider societal implications. This study utilizes both the U.S. database and the General Social Survey (GSS) to delve into the factors linked to occupational injuries. Methods: In this study, 30 questions from the GSS between 2002 and 2014 were used. The sample included 5,914 workers from various sectors, distributed between both female and male, and were of 18 years and above. The analysis encompasses several dimensions: demographics, job-related characteristics, administrative factors, and health and safety measures. The study particularly focuses on assessing the prevalence of three common work-related injuries: nonfatal injuries, back pain and arm pain. Logistic regression models were constructed to gauge the effects of identified factors. Results: Significant insights emerge from the analysis. Factors such as age, gender, race, working hours, overtime work, trust in management, coworker support, and workflow smoothness were identified as having notable impacts on work-related injuries. For each model, the study quantifies these impacts through odds ratio and relative effects. For example, in the nonfatal injuries model, the relative effects of age showed that workers aged 65 years or older experience a 2.56% decrease in the frequency of nonfatal injuries compared to younger workers. Furthermore, in the back pain model, the estimated odds of having back pain in males are 0.90 lower than that in females. Moreover, in the arm pain model, workers who have sufficient time to complete their tasks have estimated odds of experiencing arm pain that are 0.85 lower than those who don’t have adequate time, etc. Conclusions: Understanding the intricate interplay of various factors influencing workers’ safety and health is vital for addressing occupational injuries. By addressing these factors, there’s potential for reducing work-related injuries, enhancing work environment, and minimizing costs. Practical Applications: Organizations can use the study’s findings for reducing work related injuries. Flexible work arrangements, tailored training programs, and ergonomic improvements might highlight factors such as age, gender, and working hours. Enhancing communication, fostering a positive work culture, and prioritizing safety and health measures could reduce risks associated with trusting management and coworker support. Cost-benefit analysis and continuous monitoring ensure these interventions’ effectiveness, reduce back and hand pain incidents, minimize cost, and create safer workplaces, thereby boosting the overall well-being of workers and organizational success.

揭开工作场所安全与健康赋权的面纱:揭示影响职业伤害的关键因素
导言:全球有数百万工人遭受工伤,导致死亡、受伤、失业和更广泛的社会影响。本研究利用美国数据库和一般社会调查(GSS)来深入研究与工伤相关的因素。研究方法:本研究使用了 2002 年至 2014 年间 GSS 的 30 个问题。样本包括 5,914 名来自各行各业的 18 岁及以上的男女工人。分析包括几个方面:人口统计学、与工作相关的特征、行政因素以及健康和安全措施。研究尤其侧重于评估三种常见工伤的发生率:非致命工伤、背部疼痛和手臂疼痛。研究人员构建了逻辑回归模型,以衡量已识别因素的影响。研究结果分析得出了重要结论。年龄、性别、种族、工作时间、加班、对管理层的信任、同事的支持和工作流程的流畅性等因素被认为对工伤有显著影响。对于每个模型,研究通过几率比和相对效应来量化这些影响。例如,在非致命工伤模型中,年龄的相对效应显示,65 岁或以上的工人与年轻工人相比,非致命工伤的频率降低了 2.56%。此外,在背部疼痛模型中,男性背部疼痛的估计几率比女性低 0.90。此外,在手臂疼痛模型中,有足够时间完成任务的工人出现手臂疼痛的估计几率比没有足够时间的工人低 0.85 等。结论了解影响工人安全和健康的各种因素之间错综复杂的相互作用,对于解决工伤问题至关重要。通过解决这些因素,有可能减少工伤、改善工作环境并最大限度地降低成本。实际应用:各组织可利用研究结果减少工伤事故。灵活的工作安排、量身定制的培训计划以及人体工程学的改进都可以突出年龄、性别和工作时间等因素。加强沟通、培养积极的工作文化、优先考虑安全和健康措施,可以降低与信任管理和同事支持相关的风险。成本效益分析和持续监测可确保这些干预措施的有效性,减少背部和手部疼痛事故,最大限度地降低成本,创造更安全的工作场所,从而促进工人的整体福祉和组织的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信