Tissue plasminogen activator for acute branch atheromatous disease exhibits transient improvement and worsening

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
{"title":"Tissue plasminogen activator for acute branch atheromatous disease exhibits transient improvement and worsening","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jns.2024.123201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is an effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Although initial improvement is observed when administered for branch atheromatous disease (BAD), some cases subsequently worsen. Clinical data on the characteristics of these patients is lacking, and the benefits of tPA are unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To analyze rebound cases and elucidate the clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with tPA administration in BAD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This multicenter retrospective study was conducted in Japan. Worsening after initial improvement of a condition is termed as rebound, and such cases were compared with other types of ischemic stroke in patients with and without rebound. The characteristics of patients with BAD who rebounded were examined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 93 patients. Among the patients who were administered tPA, the NIHSS scores at 24 h and 7 days post-tPA were significantly higher in patients with BAD than in patients with other types of infarcts. The group with BAD exhibited a significantly higher rate of rebound than other groups (37.5 % vs. 0 %, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). However, no differences were observed in outcomes between patients who experienced rebound after tPA administration and those who did not.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Reevaluation and changing the strategy of tPA use in patients with BAD may be necessary. However, this study does not totally discourage its use, as specific patients can benefit.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17417,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X24003368","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is an effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Although initial improvement is observed when administered for branch atheromatous disease (BAD), some cases subsequently worsen. Clinical data on the characteristics of these patients is lacking, and the benefits of tPA are unclear.

Objective

To analyze rebound cases and elucidate the clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with tPA administration in BAD.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective study was conducted in Japan. Worsening after initial improvement of a condition is termed as rebound, and such cases were compared with other types of ischemic stroke in patients with and without rebound. The characteristics of patients with BAD who rebounded were examined.

Results

The study included 93 patients. Among the patients who were administered tPA, the NIHSS scores at 24 h and 7 days post-tPA were significantly higher in patients with BAD than in patients with other types of infarcts. The group with BAD exhibited a significantly higher rate of rebound than other groups (37.5 % vs. 0 %, P < 0.001). However, no differences were observed in outcomes between patients who experienced rebound after tPA administration and those who did not.

Conclusions

Reevaluation and changing the strategy of tPA use in patients with BAD may be necessary. However, this study does not totally discourage its use, as specific patients can benefit.

组织浆细胞酶原激活剂治疗急性动脉粥样硬化性分支疾病的疗效一过性改善,一过性恶化
背景组织纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)是治疗急性缺血性中风的有效方法。虽然在治疗动脉粥样硬化性疾病(BAD)时可观察到初步改善,但有些病例随后会恶化。目标分析反弹病例,阐明 BAD 中使用 tPA 的相关临床特征和结果。方法这项多中心回顾性研究在日本进行。方法在日本开展了这项多中心回顾性研究。研究人员将病情初步改善后恶化的病例称为反弹,并将有反弹和无反弹的缺血性卒中病例与其他类型的缺血性卒中病例进行了比较。研究还考察了反弹的 BAD 患者的特征。在接受 tPA 治疗的患者中,BAD 患者在接受 tPA 治疗后 24 小时和 7 天的 NIHSS 评分明显高于其他类型的梗死患者。BAD 组的反弹率明显高于其他组(37.5% 对 0%,P < 0.001)。结论可能有必要对 BAD 患者使用 tPA 的策略进行重新评估和改变。不过,这项研究并不完全不鼓励使用tPA,因为特定的患者可以从中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Journal of the Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
313
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Neurological Sciences provides a medium for the prompt publication of original articles in neurology and neuroscience from around the world. JNS places special emphasis on articles that: 1) provide guidance to clinicians around the world (Best Practices, Global Neurology); 2) report cutting-edge science related to neurology (Basic and Translational Sciences); 3) educate readers about relevant and practical clinical outcomes in neurology (Outcomes Research); and 4) summarize or editorialize the current state of the literature (Reviews, Commentaries, and Editorials). JNS accepts most types of manuscripts for consideration including original research papers, short communications, reviews, book reviews, letters to the Editor, opinions and editorials. Topics considered will be from neurology-related fields that are of interest to practicing physicians around the world. Examples include neuromuscular diseases, demyelination, atrophies, dementia, neoplasms, infections, epilepsies, disturbances of consciousness, stroke and cerebral circulation, growth and development, plasticity and intermediary metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信