{"title":"Boosting co-creation of Nature‐based Solutions within Living Labs: Interrelating enablers using Interpretive Structural Modelling","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Co-creation is at the intersection of Nature-based Solutions and Living Lab concepts, which adopt collaboration and innovation amongst different stakeholders to address complex issues such as climate change. Nature-based Solutions have been increasingly recognized for their potential to address diverse societal challenges in a multifunctional, action-oriented, and contextualized manner. Living Labs have proliferated as a participatory approach for the co-development and co-testing of Nature-based Solutions, particularly in Europe. Nevertheless, there is a persistent challenge regarding enhancing stakeholder engagement, which is recognized as crucial for the implementation of Nature-based Solutions. In this article, we examined ten empirical cases of Living Labs applying Nature-based Solutions to increase climate resilience in European coastal cities. We conducted an Interpretive Structural Modelling and Cross-impact Matrix Multiplication Applied to Classification analysis methodology to systematically analyse and interrelate co-creation enablers. We have identified fifteen enablers to co-create Nature-based Solutions in Living Labs across five levels of influence among each other. A key finding is that ‘sharing and learning from real-life examples’ and ‘opening opportunities for informal inputs’ have the most driving power among the studied enablers. Having a robust engagement toolbox also appears to be a crucial point in enhancing co-creation. Exploring the potential of such enablers seems vital to fostering the co-creation of Nature-based Solutions within Living Labs. By understanding how enablers are interlinked and can be prioritized based on their driving and dependence powers, environmental managers can better use their resources and engage with their key stakeholders more successfully.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002077/pdfft?md5=cb5acbba7d1a72bfc27659df12d1eb4e&pid=1-s2.0-S1462901124002077-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Co-creation is at the intersection of Nature-based Solutions and Living Lab concepts, which adopt collaboration and innovation amongst different stakeholders to address complex issues such as climate change. Nature-based Solutions have been increasingly recognized for their potential to address diverse societal challenges in a multifunctional, action-oriented, and contextualized manner. Living Labs have proliferated as a participatory approach for the co-development and co-testing of Nature-based Solutions, particularly in Europe. Nevertheless, there is a persistent challenge regarding enhancing stakeholder engagement, which is recognized as crucial for the implementation of Nature-based Solutions. In this article, we examined ten empirical cases of Living Labs applying Nature-based Solutions to increase climate resilience in European coastal cities. We conducted an Interpretive Structural Modelling and Cross-impact Matrix Multiplication Applied to Classification analysis methodology to systematically analyse and interrelate co-creation enablers. We have identified fifteen enablers to co-create Nature-based Solutions in Living Labs across five levels of influence among each other. A key finding is that ‘sharing and learning from real-life examples’ and ‘opening opportunities for informal inputs’ have the most driving power among the studied enablers. Having a robust engagement toolbox also appears to be a crucial point in enhancing co-creation. Exploring the potential of such enablers seems vital to fostering the co-creation of Nature-based Solutions within Living Labs. By understanding how enablers are interlinked and can be prioritized based on their driving and dependence powers, environmental managers can better use their resources and engage with their key stakeholders more successfully.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.