L. Sciuto , F. Licciardello , V. Scavera , D. Verde , E.R. Giuffrida , G.L. Cirelli
{"title":"The role of Nature-Based Solutions for the water flow management in a Mediterranean urban area","authors":"L. Sciuto , F. Licciardello , V. Scavera , D. Verde , E.R. Giuffrida , G.L. Cirelli","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Due to climate change and rapid urban sprawl, central Mediterranean regions are subjected to short but intensive storm events resulting in a significant increase of flow rates and runoff volumes in low-lying coastal urban areas. Within the framework of green urban infrastructures (GUIs), a suitable combination of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) with traditional grey infrastructures should be adopted to mitigate flood risk effects in urban and sub-urban areas contributing at the same time to achieve multiple benefits for both the environment and the community. The aim of this study is (i) to evaluate flood hazard maps for identifying the areas within a Sicilian hydrological river basin (Toscano catchment) with a high risk of flooding by implementing the HEC-RAS model at catchment scale; (ii) to quantify the peak flow and floodplain area reduction; (iii) to assess the effectiveness of small-scale NBS (green roofs, porous pavements, rain gardens and rain barrel), in terms of peak flow and runoff volume reductions, at urban block scale by using the EPA SWMM model Model simulations are performed integrating the hydraulic (HEC-RAS) and hydrological (EPA SWMM) models for return periods of 10, 50 and 200 years. The results showed that the estimated peak flow (m<sup>3</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>) obtained from the simulations performed at catchment scale for each T in the current scenario (without NBS) using HEC-RAS and EPA SWMM models are very close to each other (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99). In addition, the utopian scenario simulation showed the HEC-RAS model sensitivity to CN calibration achieving a peak flow reduction up to about 60% with the floodplain area decreasing up to about 17%. Finally, the model EPA SWMM shows its sensitivity to NBS implementation at urban block scale with a peak flow reduction up to about 16% and a runoff volume (mm) reduction up to about 24%. These reductions decrease as T increases with a higher NBS mitigation effects for the lowest T. The results highlighted that the integration of NBS in urban areas could have hydrological and hydraulic positive effects, particularly in terms of peak flow and runoff volume reduction. Furthermore, the results suggest that small-scale NBS have a potential to be effective to smaller rainfall events, but a combination with large-scale NBS is necessary to cope with extreme events.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 107375"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002003/pdfft?md5=88ad80a604d8ee97e9dea72af384f1e3&pid=1-s2.0-S0925857424002003-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Due to climate change and rapid urban sprawl, central Mediterranean regions are subjected to short but intensive storm events resulting in a significant increase of flow rates and runoff volumes in low-lying coastal urban areas. Within the framework of green urban infrastructures (GUIs), a suitable combination of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) with traditional grey infrastructures should be adopted to mitigate flood risk effects in urban and sub-urban areas contributing at the same time to achieve multiple benefits for both the environment and the community. The aim of this study is (i) to evaluate flood hazard maps for identifying the areas within a Sicilian hydrological river basin (Toscano catchment) with a high risk of flooding by implementing the HEC-RAS model at catchment scale; (ii) to quantify the peak flow and floodplain area reduction; (iii) to assess the effectiveness of small-scale NBS (green roofs, porous pavements, rain gardens and rain barrel), in terms of peak flow and runoff volume reductions, at urban block scale by using the EPA SWMM model Model simulations are performed integrating the hydraulic (HEC-RAS) and hydrological (EPA SWMM) models for return periods of 10, 50 and 200 years. The results showed that the estimated peak flow (m3 s−1) obtained from the simulations performed at catchment scale for each T in the current scenario (without NBS) using HEC-RAS and EPA SWMM models are very close to each other (R2 = 0.99). In addition, the utopian scenario simulation showed the HEC-RAS model sensitivity to CN calibration achieving a peak flow reduction up to about 60% with the floodplain area decreasing up to about 17%. Finally, the model EPA SWMM shows its sensitivity to NBS implementation at urban block scale with a peak flow reduction up to about 16% and a runoff volume (mm) reduction up to about 24%. These reductions decrease as T increases with a higher NBS mitigation effects for the lowest T. The results highlighted that the integration of NBS in urban areas could have hydrological and hydraulic positive effects, particularly in terms of peak flow and runoff volume reduction. Furthermore, the results suggest that small-scale NBS have a potential to be effective to smaller rainfall events, but a combination with large-scale NBS is necessary to cope with extreme events.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.