{"title":"Native macrophyte community response to water-level manipulation for an invasive species","authors":"Maxwell R.W. Beal , Erik R. Olson","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Disturbance regimes related to water level fluctuation play an important role in the structuring of aquatic macrophyte communities. In managed systems, winter water level drawdowns have shown promise in controlling populations of nuisance macrophytes, however, drawdowns may have unintended negative consequences on erosion, fauna, and non-target plant species. The Chippewa Flowage, located in Sawyer County, WI, has implemented targeted winter water level drawdowns with the goal of reducing nuisance levels of <em>Myriophyllum spicatum</em>. To evaluate the effects of water level drawdowns on <em>Myriophyllum spicatum</em> and the native macrophyte community, we conducted repeated full lake surveys of aquatic macrophytes at 2018 points under drawdown and normal water level management in 2005/06, 2015, and 2017. We supplemented these efforts with downscaled surveys in 2007, 2010, and 2016. Surveys revealed a statistically significant decline in both <em>Myriophyllum spicatum</em> occurrence and abundance, and average macrophyte abundance during active drawdown management. Kernel distributions of change in point-specific c-value between the two time periods showed a significant increase under drawdown conditions, and a decrease under normal management (D = 0.41, <em>P</em> ≤0.0001). Drawdown management appeared to successfully control <em>Myriophyllum spicatum</em> abundance and allowed for improvements in the floristic quality of the macrophyte community but resulted in reduced macrophyte abundance overall.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 107380"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Disturbance regimes related to water level fluctuation play an important role in the structuring of aquatic macrophyte communities. In managed systems, winter water level drawdowns have shown promise in controlling populations of nuisance macrophytes, however, drawdowns may have unintended negative consequences on erosion, fauna, and non-target plant species. The Chippewa Flowage, located in Sawyer County, WI, has implemented targeted winter water level drawdowns with the goal of reducing nuisance levels of Myriophyllum spicatum. To evaluate the effects of water level drawdowns on Myriophyllum spicatum and the native macrophyte community, we conducted repeated full lake surveys of aquatic macrophytes at 2018 points under drawdown and normal water level management in 2005/06, 2015, and 2017. We supplemented these efforts with downscaled surveys in 2007, 2010, and 2016. Surveys revealed a statistically significant decline in both Myriophyllum spicatum occurrence and abundance, and average macrophyte abundance during active drawdown management. Kernel distributions of change in point-specific c-value between the two time periods showed a significant increase under drawdown conditions, and a decrease under normal management (D = 0.41, P ≤0.0001). Drawdown management appeared to successfully control Myriophyllum spicatum abundance and allowed for improvements in the floristic quality of the macrophyte community but resulted in reduced macrophyte abundance overall.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.