UAV Wing leading edge crashworthiness behaviour under bird strike events: The added value of CF/PA additive solutions versus traditional metallic wing structures

IF 5.3 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES
{"title":"UAV Wing leading edge crashworthiness behaviour under bird strike events: The added value of CF/PA additive solutions versus traditional metallic wing structures","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, an increasing interest in innovative solutions design of aircraft structural components has been raised through both research and industrial fields, aimed at optimising weight and enhancing the ability to withstand both static and dynamic loads. This study compares the structural response to a bird strike phenomenon of a vertical tail of a UAV in standard metallic configuration with the one obtained from an innovative solution, equal in volume but with an internally designed architecture for an additive approach and manufactured by employing a carbon fibre reinforced filament engineered for metal replacement applications (carbon fibre, CF/polyamide, PA). The additive solution proposes the use of a 10 % infill and a lattice structure that completely replaces the traditional aircraft structure concept. This approach leads to a significant weight reduction, approximately 45 % compared to the traditional metallic configuration. The investigation was conducted through explicit numerical simulations considering different impact angles. The numerical model of the bird strike has been assessed by numerical-experimental comparison, simulating the impact of a bird with a flat plate. For this study, the Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) approach has been adopted to perform the simulation. The results were compared in terms of stress distribution, failure analysis, displacements, and energy-time and force-time diagrams. The work demonstrated that using innovative manufacturing processes, such as additive manufacturing, can significantly improve the bird strike resistance of aerospace structures. This improvement is achieved though the production of lighter, structurally collaborative geometries, by reducing the load transferred to the rest of the UAV by about 47 % and decreasing the displacement on the impact area by 53 %.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34525,"journal":{"name":"Composites Part C Open Access","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666682024000756/pdfft?md5=05c7316ddf0650855e58808c196e41d9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666682024000756-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Part C Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666682024000756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, an increasing interest in innovative solutions design of aircraft structural components has been raised through both research and industrial fields, aimed at optimising weight and enhancing the ability to withstand both static and dynamic loads. This study compares the structural response to a bird strike phenomenon of a vertical tail of a UAV in standard metallic configuration with the one obtained from an innovative solution, equal in volume but with an internally designed architecture for an additive approach and manufactured by employing a carbon fibre reinforced filament engineered for metal replacement applications (carbon fibre, CF/polyamide, PA). The additive solution proposes the use of a 10 % infill and a lattice structure that completely replaces the traditional aircraft structure concept. This approach leads to a significant weight reduction, approximately 45 % compared to the traditional metallic configuration. The investigation was conducted through explicit numerical simulations considering different impact angles. The numerical model of the bird strike has been assessed by numerical-experimental comparison, simulating the impact of a bird with a flat plate. For this study, the Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) approach has been adopted to perform the simulation. The results were compared in terms of stress distribution, failure analysis, displacements, and energy-time and force-time diagrams. The work demonstrated that using innovative manufacturing processes, such as additive manufacturing, can significantly improve the bird strike resistance of aerospace structures. This improvement is achieved though the production of lighter, structurally collaborative geometries, by reducing the load transferred to the rest of the UAV by about 47 % and decreasing the displacement on the impact area by 53 %.

无人机机翼前缘在鸟击事件下的防撞性能:CF/PA 添加剂解决方案相对于传统金属机翼结构的附加值
近年来,在研究和工业领域,人们对飞机结构部件的创新方案设计越来越感兴趣,其目的是优化重量,提高承受静态和动态载荷的能力。本研究比较了标准金属配置的无人机垂直尾翼与创新解决方案的结构对鸟击现象的响应,前者体积相等,但内部设计结构采用了添加剂方法,并通过采用碳纤维增强丝制造,专门用于金属替代应用(碳纤维,CF/聚酰胺,PA)。添加剂解决方案建议使用 10% 的填充物和晶格结构,以完全取代传统的飞机结构概念。与传统的金属结构相比,这种方法可大幅减重约 45%。研究是通过考虑不同撞击角度的显式数值模拟进行的。鸟击数值模型已通过数值-实验对比进行了评估,模拟了鸟与平板的撞击。这项研究采用了欧拉-拉格朗日(CEL)耦合方法进行模拟。在应力分布、失效分析、位移、能量-时间图和力-时间图等方面对结果进行了比较。研究结果表明,使用创新制造工艺(如增材制造)可以显著提高航空航天结构的抗鸟击能力。这种改进是通过生产更轻、结构协作性更强的几何结构实现的,将传递到无人机其他部分的载荷减少了约 47%,将撞击区域的位移减少了 53%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Composites Part C Open Access
Composites Part C Open Access Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
96
审稿时长
55 days
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信