DDoS detection in electric vehicle charging stations: A deep learning perspective via CICEV2023 dataset

IF 6 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Yagiz Alp Anli , Zeki Ciplak , Murat Sakaliuzun , Seniz Zekiye Izgu , Kazim Yildiz
{"title":"DDoS detection in electric vehicle charging stations: A deep learning perspective via CICEV2023 dataset","authors":"Yagiz Alp Anli ,&nbsp;Zeki Ciplak ,&nbsp;Murat Sakaliuzun ,&nbsp;Seniz Zekiye Izgu ,&nbsp;Kazim Yildiz","doi":"10.1016/j.iot.2024.101343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks have always been an important research topic in the field of information security. Regarding specialized infrastructures such as electric vehicle charging stations, detecting and preventing such attacks becomes even more critical. In the existing literature, most studies on DDoS attack detection focus on traditional methods that analyze network metrics such as network traffic, packet rates, and number of connections. These approaches attempt to detect attacks by identifying anomalies and irregularities in the network, but can have high error rates and fail to identify advanced attacks. Conversely though, detection methods based on system metrics use deeper and more insightful parameters such as processor utilization, memory usage, disk I/O operations, and system behavior. Such metrics provide a more detailed perspective than network-based approaches, allowing for more accurate detection of attacks. However, work in this area is not yet widespread enough further research and improvement are needed. The adoption of advanced system metrics-based methods can significantly improve the effectiveness of DDoS defense strategies, especially in next-generation and specialized infrastructures. This paper evaluates the applicability and effectiveness of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Feed-Forward Network (FFN) in detecting DDoS attacks against electric vehicle charging stations through system metrics using CICEV2023 dataset. Experimental results show that the LSTM based model offers advantages in terms of speed and processing capacity, while the FFN is superior in terms of the accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29968,"journal":{"name":"Internet of Things","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 101343"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet of Things","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542660524002841","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks have always been an important research topic in the field of information security. Regarding specialized infrastructures such as electric vehicle charging stations, detecting and preventing such attacks becomes even more critical. In the existing literature, most studies on DDoS attack detection focus on traditional methods that analyze network metrics such as network traffic, packet rates, and number of connections. These approaches attempt to detect attacks by identifying anomalies and irregularities in the network, but can have high error rates and fail to identify advanced attacks. Conversely though, detection methods based on system metrics use deeper and more insightful parameters such as processor utilization, memory usage, disk I/O operations, and system behavior. Such metrics provide a more detailed perspective than network-based approaches, allowing for more accurate detection of attacks. However, work in this area is not yet widespread enough further research and improvement are needed. The adoption of advanced system metrics-based methods can significantly improve the effectiveness of DDoS defense strategies, especially in next-generation and specialized infrastructures. This paper evaluates the applicability and effectiveness of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Feed-Forward Network (FFN) in detecting DDoS attacks against electric vehicle charging stations through system metrics using CICEV2023 dataset. Experimental results show that the LSTM based model offers advantages in terms of speed and processing capacity, while the FFN is superior in terms of the accuracy.

电动汽车充电站的 DDoS 检测:通过 CICEV2023 数据集的深度学习视角
分布式拒绝服务(DDoS)攻击一直是信息安全领域的重要研究课题。对于电动汽车充电站等专业基础设施而言,检测和预防此类攻击变得更加重要。在现有文献中,大多数有关 DDoS 攻击检测的研究都集中在分析网络流量、数据包速率和连接数等网络指标的传统方法上。这些方法试图通过识别网络中的异常和不正常现象来检测攻击,但错误率可能很高,而且无法识别高级攻击。相反,基于系统指标的检测方法使用更深入、更有洞察力的参数,如处理器利用率、内存使用率、磁盘 I/O 操作和系统行为。与基于网络的方法相比,此类指标能提供更详细的视角,从而更准确地检测攻击。不过,这一领域的工作还不够广泛,需要进一步研究和改进。采用先进的基于系统指标的方法可以显著提高 DDoS 防御策略的有效性,尤其是在下一代和专用基础设施中。本文利用 CICEV2023 数据集,通过系统指标评估了长短期记忆(LSTM)和前馈网络(FFN)在检测针对电动汽车充电站的 DDoS 攻击中的适用性和有效性。实验结果表明,基于 LSTM 的模型在速度和处理能力方面具有优势,而 FFN 则在准确性方面更胜一筹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internet of Things
Internet of Things Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.10%
发文量
115
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Internet of Things; Engineering Cyber Physical Human Systems is a comprehensive journal encouraging cross collaboration between researchers, engineers and practitioners in the field of IoT & Cyber Physical Human Systems. The journal offers a unique platform to exchange scientific information on the entire breadth of technology, science, and societal applications of the IoT. The journal will place a high priority on timely publication, and provide a home for high quality. Furthermore, IOT is interested in publishing topical Special Issues on any aspect of IOT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信