Dyadic coping and related factors among couples with colorectal cancer: A latent profile analysis

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Tingting Wei , Qiao Feng , Tingting A , Shaohua Hu , Ping Ni , Dongmei Zhuang , Shihui Yu
{"title":"Dyadic coping and related factors among couples with colorectal cancer: A latent profile analysis","authors":"Tingting Wei ,&nbsp;Qiao Feng ,&nbsp;Tingting A ,&nbsp;Shaohua Hu ,&nbsp;Ping Ni ,&nbsp;Dongmei Zhuang ,&nbsp;Shihui Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to identify latent subgroups of dyadic coping (DC) among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and their spousal caregivers, and to explore the factors associated with these subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 268 pairs of CRC patients and their spousal caregivers. Participants completed the General Information Questionnaire, the Dyadic Coping Inventory, the Cancer-Related Communication Problems Scale, and the Fear of Progress Questionnaire-Short Form. Latent profile analysis (LPA) of DC among CRC couples was performed using Mplus 8.3. We compared couple illness communication, fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), and demographic characteristics between the identified subgroups and conducted ordinal logistic regression analysis to examine factors associated with these subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 268 pairs of CRC patients and their spousal caregivers were classified into four subgroups based on their coping levels: low-DC group (12.3%), low common-DC group (7.1%), moderate-DC group (52.6%), and high-DC group (28.0%). Disease stage, couple illness communication, and spouse's FCR were significantly associated with the four subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is considerable variability in DC levels among CRC patients and their spousal caregivers. Patients with advanced disease stages, inadequate communication between spouses, and severe RCR exhibit lower levels of DC. These findings provide a theoretical basis for nursing personnel to develop personalized intervention strategies tailored to the characteristics of these subgroups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562524001938/pdfft?md5=1f8cc0ae1b57bb018333485a886cb569&pid=1-s2.0-S2347562524001938-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562524001938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to identify latent subgroups of dyadic coping (DC) among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and their spousal caregivers, and to explore the factors associated with these subgroups.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 268 pairs of CRC patients and their spousal caregivers. Participants completed the General Information Questionnaire, the Dyadic Coping Inventory, the Cancer-Related Communication Problems Scale, and the Fear of Progress Questionnaire-Short Form. Latent profile analysis (LPA) of DC among CRC couples was performed using Mplus 8.3. We compared couple illness communication, fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), and demographic characteristics between the identified subgroups and conducted ordinal logistic regression analysis to examine factors associated with these subgroups.

Results

The 268 pairs of CRC patients and their spousal caregivers were classified into four subgroups based on their coping levels: low-DC group (12.3%), low common-DC group (7.1%), moderate-DC group (52.6%), and high-DC group (28.0%). Disease stage, couple illness communication, and spouse's FCR were significantly associated with the four subgroups.

Conclusions

There is considerable variability in DC levels among CRC patients and their spousal caregivers. Patients with advanced disease stages, inadequate communication between spouses, and severe RCR exhibit lower levels of DC. These findings provide a theoretical basis for nursing personnel to develop personalized intervention strategies tailored to the characteristics of these subgroups.

患有结直肠癌的夫妇之间的共同应对及相关因素:潜在特征分析
方法 我们进行了一项横断面研究,共有 268 对 CRC 患者及其配偶照顾者参加。参与者填写了一般信息问卷、家庭应对量表、癌症相关沟通问题量表和恐惧进展问卷-简表。我们使用 Mplus 8.3 对 CRC 夫妇中的 DC 进行了潜在特征分析(LPA)。我们比较了所确定的亚组之间的夫妇疾病沟通、对癌症复发的恐惧(FCR)和人口统计学特征,并进行了序数逻辑回归分析,以研究与这些亚组相关的因素。结果 268 对 CRC 患者及其配偶照顾者根据其应对水平被分为四个亚组:低 DC 组(12.3%)、低共同 DC 组(7.1%)、中等 DC 组(52.6%)和高 DC 组(28.0%)。疾病分期、夫妻疾病沟通和配偶的 FCR 与四个亚组有显著相关性。疾病晚期、配偶间沟通不足和严重 RCR 的患者表现出较低的 DC 水平。这些发现为护理人员针对这些亚组的特点制定个性化干预策略提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信