Comparative analysis of predose effects on TL and OSL signals in BeO dosimeters

IF 1.6 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Engin Aşlar
{"title":"Comparative analysis of predose effects on TL and OSL signals in BeO dosimeters","authors":"Engin Aşlar","doi":"10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates in detail the effects of predose on TL and OSL signals for BeO dosimeters. The TL and OSL signals were deconvoluted to each peak and component. As a result of deconvolution, the variations in the kinetic parameters (<em>E, T</em><sub><em>max</em></sub><em>, b</em>) for the TL signals and the lifetime values of the OSL signals were investigated. In addition, sensitivity changes according to predose were monitored for each peak and component. Finally, dose response curves were studied using the dose linearity index <em>(f(D</em>)) for each peak and component. Accordingly, the peak structures and kinetic parameters did not change according to the predose for the TL signal, whereas variations in the lifetime values for the OSL signal were observed, especially at the initial dose values (0.1 and 0.2 Gy). There was no change in sensitivity according to the predose for the total area condition although each peak and component exhibited independent behavior. Therefore, TL and OSL signals should be evaluated based on the total area in predose applications. The TL and OSL dose response curves exhibited different behaviors according to predose. TL dose response curves were not affected by the predose except for 1000 Gy, while the OSL dose response curves were affected by the predose considering the total area condition. The possible reason for the differences between the TL and OSL dose response curves is the significant transfer effect in the OSL signal at low doses, which results in greater changes at low doses compared to the TL signal. Also, thermal quenching effects may have resulted in lower intensity in the case of the TL signal. In future studies, preheating tests and thermal quenching corrections on TL peaks at high predoses may increase our understanding of deep trap interactions in BeO dosimeters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21055,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Measurements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Measurements","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350448724002270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates in detail the effects of predose on TL and OSL signals for BeO dosimeters. The TL and OSL signals were deconvoluted to each peak and component. As a result of deconvolution, the variations in the kinetic parameters (E, Tmax, b) for the TL signals and the lifetime values of the OSL signals were investigated. In addition, sensitivity changes according to predose were monitored for each peak and component. Finally, dose response curves were studied using the dose linearity index (f(D)) for each peak and component. Accordingly, the peak structures and kinetic parameters did not change according to the predose for the TL signal, whereas variations in the lifetime values for the OSL signal were observed, especially at the initial dose values (0.1 and 0.2 Gy). There was no change in sensitivity according to the predose for the total area condition although each peak and component exhibited independent behavior. Therefore, TL and OSL signals should be evaluated based on the total area in predose applications. The TL and OSL dose response curves exhibited different behaviors according to predose. TL dose response curves were not affected by the predose except for 1000 Gy, while the OSL dose response curves were affected by the predose considering the total area condition. The possible reason for the differences between the TL and OSL dose response curves is the significant transfer effect in the OSL signal at low doses, which results in greater changes at low doses compared to the TL signal. Also, thermal quenching effects may have resulted in lower intensity in the case of the TL signal. In future studies, preheating tests and thermal quenching corrections on TL peaks at high predoses may increase our understanding of deep trap interactions in BeO dosimeters.

剂量前对 BeO 辐射计中 TL 和 OSL 信号影响的比较分析
本研究详细调查了剂量前对 BeO 剂量计的 TL 和 OSL 信号的影响。对 TL 和 OSL 信号的每个峰值和分量进行了解卷积。通过解卷积,研究了 TL 信号的动力学参数(E、Tmax、b)和 OSL 信号的寿命值的变化。此外,还监测了每个峰值和成分的敏感度随剂量前的变化。最后,使用剂量线性指数(f(D))研究了每个峰值和组分的剂量反应曲线。结果表明,TL 信号的峰值结构和动力学参数并没有随剂量的变化而变化,而 OSL 信号的寿命值却出现了变化,尤其是在初始剂量值(0.1 和 0.2 Gy)时。虽然每个峰值和分量都表现出独立的行为,但总面积条件下的灵敏度并没有随着预剂量的变化而变化。因此,在剂量前应用中,应根据总面积来评估 TL 和 OSL 信号。TL 和 OSL 剂量响应曲线随剂量前的不同而表现出不同的行为。除 1000 Gy 外,TL 剂量响应曲线不受预剂量的影响,而 OSL 剂量响应曲线则受到预剂量(考虑总面积条件)的影响。TL 和 OSL 剂量响应曲线之间存在差异的可能原因是,低剂量时 OSL 信号具有显著的传递效应,这导致低剂量时的变化比 TL 信号更大。此外,热淬火效应也可能导致 TL 信号强度降低。在今后的研究中,对高预测剂量下的 TL 峰进行预热测试和热淬火修正,可能会加深我们对 BeO 剂量计中深陷阱相互作用的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Measurements
Radiation Measurements 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The journal seeks to publish papers that present advances in the following areas: spontaneous and stimulated luminescence (including scintillating materials, thermoluminescence, and optically stimulated luminescence); electron spin resonance of natural and synthetic materials; the physics, design and performance of radiation measurements (including computational modelling such as electronic transport simulations); the novel basic aspects of radiation measurement in medical physics. Studies of energy-transfer phenomena, track physics and microdosimetry are also of interest to the journal. Applications relevant to the journal, particularly where they present novel detection techniques, novel analytical approaches or novel materials, include: personal dosimetry (including dosimetric quantities, active/electronic and passive monitoring techniques for photon, neutron and charged-particle exposures); environmental dosimetry (including methodological advances and predictive models related to radon, but generally excluding local survey results of radon where the main aim is to establish the radiation risk to populations); cosmic and high-energy radiation measurements (including dosimetry, space radiation effects, and single event upsets); dosimetry-based archaeological and Quaternary dating; dosimetry-based approaches to thermochronometry; accident and retrospective dosimetry (including activation detectors), and dosimetry and measurements related to medical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信