Alzheimer's disease. A critical review.

C G Gottfries
{"title":"Alzheimer's disease. A critical review.","authors":"C G Gottfries","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical and neuropathological findings in a 51-year-old woman by Alois Alzheimer (1) led to a description of the disorder which Kraepelin (2) named Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this progressive dementia disorder the senile plaques and fibrillary tangles found at brain autopsy are the diagnostic hallmarks. As the same type of neuropathological changes are found in dementias of senile age, these disorders are named senile dementia of the Alzheimer type (SDAT). The two forms are often combined into one group, the Alzheimer dementias, (AD/SDAT) and, according to the DSM-III, classified as primary degenerative disorders (PDD). However, it must be emphasized that there is no scientific basis for sampling the two forms, the diagnoses of both AD and SDAT are exclusive. Several hypotheses are being proposed as to the etiology of AD/SDAT. Genetic factors, aluminium or other toxic factors, immunological disturbances, disturbed glucose metabolism, deficiency of essential nutrients, and stress, are some of the lines followed when seeking the etiology. The pathogenesis of the disorder involves not only structural changes but also neurochemical disturbances and neuroendocrine dysfunction, findings which are related to the behavioural disturbances seen in the disease. At present there are no reliable biological markers for AD/SDAT. Clinical investigations together with laboratory data and brain imaging support the assumption of several sub-groups within the Alzheimer type dementias. The neurochemical findings made in AD/SDAT have constituted the basis for formulating pharmacological treatment strategies. Drugs affecting the cholinergic and monoaminergic systems have been used, as well as neuropeptides and similar drugs. Gangliosides and phosphatidylserine have also been tested in clinical trials. Hitherto, this treatment has not been as successful as expected. Cholinergic drugs have given a marginal effect on memory functions. Emotional disturbances and disturbed motor performance have to some extent been influenced by the use of selective 5-hydroxytryptamine reuptake blockers and L-dopa. Whether this treatment is of clinical importance must be further investigated. Interesting neuropathological and neurochemical research is being conducted on AD/SDAT. However, clinical research aiming at delimiting homogeneous subgroups of dementia has not kept in step with neurobiological research. More effort must be put into clinical research if therapeutic progress is to be achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":77838,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive gerontology. Section C, Interdisciplinary topics","volume":"2 1","pages":"47-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive gerontology. Section C, Interdisciplinary topics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical and neuropathological findings in a 51-year-old woman by Alois Alzheimer (1) led to a description of the disorder which Kraepelin (2) named Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this progressive dementia disorder the senile plaques and fibrillary tangles found at brain autopsy are the diagnostic hallmarks. As the same type of neuropathological changes are found in dementias of senile age, these disorders are named senile dementia of the Alzheimer type (SDAT). The two forms are often combined into one group, the Alzheimer dementias, (AD/SDAT) and, according to the DSM-III, classified as primary degenerative disorders (PDD). However, it must be emphasized that there is no scientific basis for sampling the two forms, the diagnoses of both AD and SDAT are exclusive. Several hypotheses are being proposed as to the etiology of AD/SDAT. Genetic factors, aluminium or other toxic factors, immunological disturbances, disturbed glucose metabolism, deficiency of essential nutrients, and stress, are some of the lines followed when seeking the etiology. The pathogenesis of the disorder involves not only structural changes but also neurochemical disturbances and neuroendocrine dysfunction, findings which are related to the behavioural disturbances seen in the disease. At present there are no reliable biological markers for AD/SDAT. Clinical investigations together with laboratory data and brain imaging support the assumption of several sub-groups within the Alzheimer type dementias. The neurochemical findings made in AD/SDAT have constituted the basis for formulating pharmacological treatment strategies. Drugs affecting the cholinergic and monoaminergic systems have been used, as well as neuropeptides and similar drugs. Gangliosides and phosphatidylserine have also been tested in clinical trials. Hitherto, this treatment has not been as successful as expected. Cholinergic drugs have given a marginal effect on memory functions. Emotional disturbances and disturbed motor performance have to some extent been influenced by the use of selective 5-hydroxytryptamine reuptake blockers and L-dopa. Whether this treatment is of clinical importance must be further investigated. Interesting neuropathological and neurochemical research is being conducted on AD/SDAT. However, clinical research aiming at delimiting homogeneous subgroups of dementia has not kept in step with neurobiological research. More effort must be put into clinical research if therapeutic progress is to be achieved.

阿尔茨海默氏症。批判性的评论。
Alois Alzheimer(1)对一名51岁女性的临床和神经病理学发现,导致Kraepelin(2)将这种疾病命名为阿尔茨海默病(AD)。在这种进行性痴呆疾病中,脑尸检中发现的老年斑和纤维缠结是诊断标志。由于在老年痴呆中发现了相同类型的神经病理改变,这些疾病被称为老年痴呆症的阿尔茨海默型(SDAT)。这两种形式通常合并为一组,阿尔茨海默氏症(AD/SDAT),根据DSM-III,被归类为原发性退行性疾病(PDD)。然而,必须强调的是,这两种形式的抽样没有科学依据,AD和SDAT的诊断都是排他的。关于AD/SDAT的病因,人们提出了几种假设。遗传因素、铝或其他毒性因素、免疫紊乱、葡萄糖代谢紊乱、必需营养素缺乏和压力是寻找病因时遵循的一些线索。该疾病的发病机制不仅涉及结构变化,还涉及神经化学紊乱和神经内分泌功能障碍,这些发现与疾病中所见的行为障碍有关。目前还没有可靠的AD/SDAT生物标志物。临床研究、实验室数据和脑成像支持在阿尔茨海默型痴呆中存在几个亚群的假设。AD/SDAT的神经化学发现为制定药物治疗策略奠定了基础。影响胆碱能和单胺能系统的药物,以及神经肽和类似药物已被使用。神经节苷类和磷脂酰丝氨酸也在临床试验中进行了测试。迄今为止,这种治疗并不像预期的那样成功。胆碱能药物对记忆功能的影响微乎其微。选择性5-羟色胺再摄取阻滞剂和左旋多巴的使用在一定程度上影响了情绪障碍和运动表现障碍。这种治疗是否具有临床意义还有待进一步研究。有趣的神经病理学和神经化学研究正在进行AD/SDAT。然而,旨在划分痴呆同质亚群的临床研究并未与神经生物学研究保持同步。如果要取得治疗上的进展,就必须在临床研究上投入更多的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信