Effectiveness and Feasibility of Home-Based Palliative Care Interventions for Geriatric Oncology Patients: A Systematic Review Using Narrative Synthesis.

Nikolaos Vlachopoulos, Georgios Kontogiannis, Dimitra Iosifina Papageorgiou, Emmanouil Symvoulakis, Anna-Bettina Haidich, Emmanouil Smyrnakis
{"title":"Effectiveness and Feasibility of Home-Based Palliative Care Interventions for Geriatric Oncology Patients: A Systematic Review Using Narrative Synthesis.","authors":"Nikolaos Vlachopoulos, Georgios Kontogiannis, Dimitra Iosifina Papageorgiou, Emmanouil Symvoulakis, Anna-Bettina Haidich, Emmanouil Smyrnakis","doi":"10.1177/10499091241277882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to an urgent need to develop palliative care services for geriatric patients with advanced cancer, an overview of available information regarding home-based palliative care interventions would be valuable.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To summarize current literature for interventions targeted to homebound, older patients with incurable cancer, and investigate whether these patients can be benefited from home-based palliative care and achieve improved outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A search strategy consisting of terms related to home care, palliation, oncology, and geriatrics was employed. A protocol following PRISMA guidelines was prospectively uploaded at PROSPERO (ID = CRD42023404675).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Pubmed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Epistemonikos.org databases were searched from inception until the present day. Eligibility criteria were selected based on the research question, the population of interest, and the research design. The Risk of Bias Assessment Tool version 2 (RoB-2) was used to appraise study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 articles including 871 patients (out of 1236 titles and 141 fully-reviewed texts) were selected. Four studies assessed exercise interventions, two evaluated multi-component home-care models, two focused on supervision services, and two had nutrition and activity components. Eight studies reported improved outcomes in either specified or mixed cancer geriatric populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a scarcity of clinical trials regarding home-based palliative care for geriatric oncology patients, resulting in poor information and a lack of evidence. At-home interventions seem feasible and have a positive effect on pain management and functional status, but more high-quality studies are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241277882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Due to an urgent need to develop palliative care services for geriatric patients with advanced cancer, an overview of available information regarding home-based palliative care interventions would be valuable.

Aim: To summarize current literature for interventions targeted to homebound, older patients with incurable cancer, and investigate whether these patients can be benefited from home-based palliative care and achieve improved outcomes.

Design: A search strategy consisting of terms related to home care, palliation, oncology, and geriatrics was employed. A protocol following PRISMA guidelines was prospectively uploaded at PROSPERO (ID = CRD42023404675).

Data sources: Pubmed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Epistemonikos.org databases were searched from inception until the present day. Eligibility criteria were selected based on the research question, the population of interest, and the research design. The Risk of Bias Assessment Tool version 2 (RoB-2) was used to appraise study quality.

Results: A total of 10 articles including 871 patients (out of 1236 titles and 141 fully-reviewed texts) were selected. Four studies assessed exercise interventions, two evaluated multi-component home-care models, two focused on supervision services, and two had nutrition and activity components. Eight studies reported improved outcomes in either specified or mixed cancer geriatric populations.

Conclusions: There is a scarcity of clinical trials regarding home-based palliative care for geriatric oncology patients, resulting in poor information and a lack of evidence. At-home interventions seem feasible and have a positive effect on pain management and functional status, but more high-quality studies are required.

针对老年肿瘤患者的居家姑息关怀干预措施的有效性和可行性:采用叙事综合法的系统性综述。
背景:目的:总结针对居家的老年癌症患者的干预措施的现有文献,并研究这些患者是否能从居家姑息治疗中获益并获得更好的治疗效果:设计:采用的搜索策略包括与居家护理、姑息治疗、肿瘤学和老年医学相关的术语。数据来源:Pubmed(MEDLINE)、CRD42023404675(ID=CRD42023404675):对 Pubmed (MEDLINE)、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 Epistemonikos.org 等数据库进行了检索,检索时间从开始至今。资格标准根据研究问题、关注人群和研究设计进行选择。采用偏倚风险评估工具第 2 版(RoB-2)评估研究质量:共选取了 10 篇文章,包括 871 名患者(共 1236 个标题和 141 篇经过全面审阅的文章)。四项研究评估了运动干预措施,两项研究评估了多组分家庭护理模式,两项研究侧重于监督服务,两项研究包含营养和活动内容。八项研究报告了特定或混合老年癌症患者的治疗效果:结论:有关老年肿瘤患者居家姑息治疗的临床试验很少,导致信息贫乏和缺乏证据。居家干预似乎是可行的,对疼痛控制和功能状态有积极作用,但还需要更多高质量的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信