Efficacy of Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sandesh Reddy, Katherine E Kabotyanski, Samad Hirani, Tommy Liu, Zain Naqvi, Nisha Giridharan, Mohammed Hasen, Nicole R Provenza, Garrett P Banks, Sanjay J Mathew, Wayne K Goodman, Sameer A Sheth
{"title":"Efficacy of Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Sandesh Reddy, Katherine E Kabotyanski, Samad Hirani, Tommy Liu, Zain Naqvi, Nisha Giridharan, Mohammed Hasen, Nicole R Provenza, Garrett P Banks, Sanjay J Mathew, Wayne K Goodman, Sameer A Sheth","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment-resistant depression affects about 30% of individuals with major depressive disorder. Deep brain stimulation is an investigational intervention for treatment-resistant depression with varied results. We undertook this meta-analysis to synthesize outcome data across trial designs, anatomical targets, and institutions to better establish efficacy and side-effect profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic PubMed review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Seven randomized controlled trials (n = 198) and 8 open-label trials (n = 77) were included spanning 2009 to 2020. Outcome measures included Hamilton Depression Rating Scale or Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores, as well as response and remission rates over time. Outcomes were tracked at the last follow-up and quantified as a time course using model-based network meta-analysis. Linear mixed models were fit to individual patient data to identify covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Deep brain stimulation achieved 47% improvement in long-term depression scale scores, with an estimated time to reach 50% improvement of around 23 months. There were no significant subgroup effects of stimulation target, time of last follow-up, sex, age of disease onset, or duration of disease, but open-label trials showed significantly greater treatment effects than randomized controlled trials. Long-term (12-60 month) response and remission rates were 48% and 35%, respectively. The time course of improvement with active stimulation could not be adequately distinguished from that with sham stimulation, when available.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deep brain stimulation produces significant chronic improvement in symptoms of treatment-resistant depression. However, the limited sham-controlled data do not demonstrate significant improvement over placebo. Future advancements in stimulation optimization and careful blinding and placebo schemes are important next steps for this therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":"1239-1248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.08.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Treatment-resistant depression affects about 30% of individuals with major depressive disorder. Deep brain stimulation is an investigational intervention for treatment-resistant depression with varied results. We undertook this meta-analysis to synthesize outcome data across trial designs, anatomical targets, and institutions to better establish efficacy and side-effect profiles.

Methods: We conducted a systematic PubMed review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Seven randomized controlled trials (n = 198) and 8 open-label trials (n = 77) were included spanning 2009 to 2020. Outcome measures included Hamilton Depression Rating Scale or Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores, as well as response and remission rates over time. Outcomes were tracked at the last follow-up and quantified as a time course using model-based network meta-analysis. Linear mixed models were fit to individual patient data to identify covariates.

Results: Deep brain stimulation achieved 47% improvement in long-term depression scale scores, with an estimated time to reach 50% improvement of around 23 months. There were no significant subgroup effects of stimulation target, time of last follow-up, sex, age of disease onset, or duration of disease, but open-label trials showed significantly greater treatment effects than randomized controlled trials. Long-term (12-60 month) response and remission rates were 48% and 35%, respectively. The time course of improvement with active stimulation could not be adequately distinguished from that with sham stimulation, when available.

Conclusions: Deep brain stimulation produces significant chronic improvement in symptoms of treatment-resistant depression. However, the limited sham-controlled data do not demonstrate significant improvement over placebo. Future advancements in stimulation optimization and careful blinding and placebo schemes are important next steps for this therapy.

脑深部刺激治疗耐药性抑郁症的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:约有 30% 的重度抑郁症患者会出现治疗耐受性抑郁症(TRD)。脑深部刺激(DBS)是一种针对TRD的研究性干预措施,其结果各不相同。我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以综合不同试验设计、解剖靶点和机构的结果数据,从而更好地确定疗效和副作用情况:我们按照 PRISMA 指南在 PubMed 上进行了系统性综述。共纳入 7 项随机对照试验(n=198)和 8 项开放标签试验(n=77),时间跨度为 2009-2020 年。结果测量包括汉密尔顿抑郁量表或蒙哥马利-奥斯伯格抑郁量表评分,以及随时间变化的反应率和缓解率。在最后一次随访时对结果进行跟踪,并使用基于模型的网络荟萃分析将结果量化为一个时间过程。线性混合模型适用于单个患者数据,以确定协变量:结果:DBS使长期抑郁量表评分提高了47%,估计达到50%的提高需要23个月左右。刺激目标、最后一次随访时间、性别、发病年龄或病程没有明显的亚组效应,但开放标签试验的治疗效果明显高于随机对照试验。长期(12-60 个月)反应率和缓解率分别为 48% 和 35%。在有假性刺激的情况下,活性刺激与假性刺激的改善时间过程无法充分区分:结论:DBS能显著改善TRD的慢性症状。结论:DBS 对 TRD 症状有明显的慢性改善作用,但有限的假性对照数据并未显示出与安慰剂相比有明显改善。未来在刺激优化、仔细盲法和安慰剂方案方面取得进展是该疗法下一步的重要工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信