Establishing thresholds for shock index in children to identify major trauma.

Sriram Ramgopal, Jillian K Gorski, Pradip P Chaudhari, Ryan G Spurrier, Christopher M Horvat, Michelle L Macy, Rebecca E Cash, Anne M Stey, Christian Martin-Gill
{"title":"Establishing thresholds for shock index in children to identify major trauma.","authors":"Sriram Ramgopal, Jillian K Gorski, Pradip P Chaudhari, Ryan G Spurrier, Christopher M Horvat, Michelle L Macy, Rebecca E Cash, Anne M Stey, Christian Martin-Gill","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An abnormal shock index (SI) is associated with greater injury severity among children with trauma. We sought to empirically-derive age-adjusted SI cutpoints associated with major trauma in children, and to compare the accuracy of these cutpoints to existing criteria for pediatric SI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study using the 2021 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) Participant Use File. We included injured children (<18 years), excluding patients with traumatic arrests, mechanical ventilation upon hospital presentation, and inter-facility transfers. Our outcome was major trauma defined by the standardized triage assessment tool (STAT) criteria. Our exposure of interest was the SI. We empirically-derived upper and lower cutpoints for the SI using age-adjusted Z-scores. We compared the performance of these to the SI, pediatric-adjusted (SIPA), and the Pediatric SI (PSI). We validated the performance of the cutpoints in the 2019 NTDB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 64,326 and 64,316 children in the derivation and validation samples, of whom 4.9 % (derivation) and 4.0 % (validation) experienced major trauma. The empirically-derived age-adjusted SI cutpoints had a sensitivity of 43.2 % and a specificity of 79.4 % for major trauma in the validation sample. The sensitivity of the PSI for major trauma was 33.9 %, with a specificity of 90.7 % among children 1-17 years of age. The sensitivity of the SIPA was 37.4 %, with a specificity of 87.8 % among children 4-16 years of age. Evaluated using logistic regression, patients with an elevated age-adjusted SI had 3.97 greater odds (95 % confidence interval [CI] 3.63-4.33) of major trauma compared to those with a normal age-adjusted SI. Patients with a depressed SI had 1.55 greater odds (95 % CI 1.36-1.78) of major trauma. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) for the empirically-derived model (0.62, 95 % CI 0.61-0.63) was similar to the AUROC for PSI (0.62, 95 % CI 0.61-0.63); both of which were greater than the SIPA model (0.58, 95 % CI 0.57-0.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Age-adjusted SI cutpoints demonstrated a mild gain in sensitivity compared to existing measures. However, our findings suggest that the SI alone has a limited role in the identification of major trauma in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An abnormal shock index (SI) is associated with greater injury severity among children with trauma. We sought to empirically-derive age-adjusted SI cutpoints associated with major trauma in children, and to compare the accuracy of these cutpoints to existing criteria for pediatric SI.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the 2021 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) Participant Use File. We included injured children (<18 years), excluding patients with traumatic arrests, mechanical ventilation upon hospital presentation, and inter-facility transfers. Our outcome was major trauma defined by the standardized triage assessment tool (STAT) criteria. Our exposure of interest was the SI. We empirically-derived upper and lower cutpoints for the SI using age-adjusted Z-scores. We compared the performance of these to the SI, pediatric-adjusted (SIPA), and the Pediatric SI (PSI). We validated the performance of the cutpoints in the 2019 NTDB.

Results: We included 64,326 and 64,316 children in the derivation and validation samples, of whom 4.9 % (derivation) and 4.0 % (validation) experienced major trauma. The empirically-derived age-adjusted SI cutpoints had a sensitivity of 43.2 % and a specificity of 79.4 % for major trauma in the validation sample. The sensitivity of the PSI for major trauma was 33.9 %, with a specificity of 90.7 % among children 1-17 years of age. The sensitivity of the SIPA was 37.4 %, with a specificity of 87.8 % among children 4-16 years of age. Evaluated using logistic regression, patients with an elevated age-adjusted SI had 3.97 greater odds (95 % confidence interval [CI] 3.63-4.33) of major trauma compared to those with a normal age-adjusted SI. Patients with a depressed SI had 1.55 greater odds (95 % CI 1.36-1.78) of major trauma. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) for the empirically-derived model (0.62, 95 % CI 0.61-0.63) was similar to the AUROC for PSI (0.62, 95 % CI 0.61-0.63); both of which were greater than the SIPA model (0.58, 95 % CI 0.57-0.59).

Conclusion: Age-adjusted SI cutpoints demonstrated a mild gain in sensitivity compared to existing measures. However, our findings suggest that the SI alone has a limited role in the identification of major trauma in children.

确定儿童休克指数阈值,以识别重大创伤。
背景:休克指数(SI)异常与儿童外伤的严重程度有关。我们试图根据经验得出与儿童重大创伤相关的年龄调整后 SI 切点,并将这些切点的准确性与现有的儿科 SI 标准进行比较:我们使用 2021 年国家创伤数据库(NTDB)参与者使用文件进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了受伤儿童(结果:64,326 名受伤儿童和 64 名受伤儿童):我们在推导样本和验证样本中分别纳入了 64,326 名和 64,316 名儿童,其中 4.9%(推导样本)和 4.0%(验证样本)经历过重大创伤。在验证样本中,根据经验得出的年龄调整后 SI 切点对重大创伤的灵敏度为 43.2%,特异度为 79.4%。在 1-17 岁儿童中,PSI 对重大创伤的敏感性为 33.9%,特异性为 90.7%。在 4-16 岁儿童中,SIPA 的灵敏度为 37.4%,特异性为 87.8%。使用逻辑回归进行评估,与年龄调整后 SI 正常的患者相比,年龄调整后 SI 升高的患者发生重大创伤的几率要高出 3.97(95 % 置信区间 [CI] 3.63-4.33)。SI 低于正常值的患者发生重大创伤的几率为 1.55(95 % 置信区间为 1.36-1.78)。经验模型的接收者操作特征曲线下面积(0.62,95 % CI 0.61-0.63)与 PSI 的接收者操作特征曲线下面积(0.62,95 % CI 0.61-0.63)相似,均大于 SIPA 模型(0.58,95 % CI 0.57-0.59):结论:与现有的测量方法相比,年龄调整后的 SI 切点显示出轻微的灵敏度增加。然而,我们的研究结果表明,仅用 SI 来识别儿童重大创伤的作用是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信