Echocardiographic Findings in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients Treated With and Without Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Diana Morales Castro, Bruno L Ferreyro, David McAlpine, Nikolaos Evangelatos, Laura Dragoi, Ricardo Teijeiro-Paradis, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, Eddy Fan, Ghislaine Douflé
{"title":"Echocardiographic Findings in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients Treated With and Without Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.","authors":"Diana Morales Castro, Bruno L Ferreyro, David McAlpine, Nikolaos Evangelatos, Laura Dragoi, Ricardo Teijeiro-Paradis, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, Eddy Fan, Ghislaine Douflé","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe echocardiographic findings among mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome, comparing those with and without venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) support.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Intensive care unit (ICU) of a quaternary academic center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients with COVID-19 admitted between March 2020 and June 2021 receiving mechanical ventilation, with an echocardiogram within 72 hours of admission.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Admission and follow-up echocardiograms during ICU stay.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Patient characteristics and echocardiographic findings were analyzed. Mortality odds ratio (OR) for right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction and acute cor pulmonale (ACP) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Among 242 patients, 145 (60%) received VV ECMO. Median (IQR) PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> was 76 (65-95) and 98 (85-140) in ECMO and non-ECMO patients, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). Initial echocardiograms showed no significant differences in left ventricular systolic dysfunction (10% v 15 %, p = 0.31) and RV systolic dysfunction (38% v. 27%, p = 0.27) between ECMO and non-ECMO patients. ACP was more frequent in the ECMO group at baseline (41% v. 26 %, p = 0.02). During the ICU stay, patients on ECMO exhibited a higher prevalence of RV systolic dysfunction (55% v 34%, p = 0.001) and ACP (51% v 26%, p = 0.002). RV systolic dysfunction (OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.09-3.63) and ACP (OR 2.95; 95% CI 1.55-5.62) on the follow-up echocardiograms were associated with higher odds of ICU mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of echocardiographic abnormalities, in particular RV dysfunction, was frequent among patients with COVID-19 receiving VV ECMO support and was associated with worse clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2024.08.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To describe echocardiographic findings among mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome, comparing those with and without venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) support.

Design: Single-center, retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Intensive care unit (ICU) of a quaternary academic center.

Participants: Patients with COVID-19 admitted between March 2020 and June 2021 receiving mechanical ventilation, with an echocardiogram within 72 hours of admission.

Interventions: Admission and follow-up echocardiograms during ICU stay.

Measurements: Patient characteristics and echocardiographic findings were analyzed. Mortality odds ratio (OR) for right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction and acute cor pulmonale (ACP) was calculated.

Main results: Among 242 patients, 145 (60%) received VV ECMO. Median (IQR) PaO2/FiO2 was 76 (65-95) and 98 (85-140) in ECMO and non-ECMO patients, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). Initial echocardiograms showed no significant differences in left ventricular systolic dysfunction (10% v 15 %, p = 0.31) and RV systolic dysfunction (38% v. 27%, p = 0.27) between ECMO and non-ECMO patients. ACP was more frequent in the ECMO group at baseline (41% v. 26 %, p = 0.02). During the ICU stay, patients on ECMO exhibited a higher prevalence of RV systolic dysfunction (55% v 34%, p = 0.001) and ACP (51% v 26%, p = 0.002). RV systolic dysfunction (OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.09-3.63) and ACP (OR 2.95; 95% CI 1.55-5.62) on the follow-up echocardiograms were associated with higher odds of ICU mortality.

Conclusions: The prevalence of echocardiographic abnormalities, in particular RV dysfunction, was frequent among patients with COVID-19 receiving VV ECMO support and was associated with worse clinical outcomes.

接受和未接受体外膜氧合治疗的 COVID-19 重症患者的超声心动图结果。
目的:描述 COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征机械通气患者的超声心动图结果:描述COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征机械通气患者的超声心动图检查结果,比较有静脉体外膜氧合(VV ECMO)支持和没有静脉体外膜氧合支持的患者:单中心、回顾性队列研究:地点:一家四级学术中心的重症监护室(ICU):2020年3月至2021年6月期间入院接受机械通气的COVID-19患者,入院72小时内接受超声心动图检查:入院和入住重症监护室期间的随访超声心动图:测量:分析患者特征和超声心动图结果。主要结果:242 名患者中,145 人(145 例)因右心室收缩功能障碍和急性肺心病(ACP)而死亡:在 242 名患者中,145 人(60%)接受了 VV ECMO。ECMO 和非 ECMO 患者的 PaO2/FiO2 中位数(IQR)分别为 76(65-95)和 98(85-140)(p ≤ 0.001)。初始超声心动图显示,ECMO 和非 ECMO 患者的左心室收缩功能障碍(10% 对 15%,P = 0.31)和 RV 收缩功能障碍(38% 对 27%,P = 0.27)无明显差异。基线时,ECMO 组的 ACP 发生率更高(41% 对 26%,P = 0.02)。在重症监护室住院期间,ECMO 患者出现 RV 收缩功能障碍(55% 对 34%,p = 0.001)和 ACP(51% 对 26%,p = 0.002)的比例更高。随访超声心动图显示,RV收缩功能障碍(OR 1.99;95% CI 1.09-3.63)和ACP(OR 2.95;95% CI 1.55-5.62)与ICU死亡率较高相关:结论:在接受 VV ECMO 支持的 COVID-19 患者中,超声心动图异常,尤其是 RV 功能障碍的发生率很高,并且与较差的临床预后有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信