Montane evergreen forest deforestation for banana plantations decreased soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stores to alarming levels

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Tarquinio Mateus Magalhães, Edna Rita Bernardo Cossa, Hunilcia Esperança Nhanombe, Amélia David Muchanga Mugabe
{"title":"Montane evergreen forest deforestation for banana plantations decreased soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stores to alarming levels","authors":"Tarquinio Mateus Magalhães,&nbsp;Edna Rita Bernardo Cossa,&nbsp;Hunilcia Esperança Nhanombe,&nbsp;Amélia David Muchanga Mugabe","doi":"10.1186/s13021-024-00278-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Forest conversion to agricultural land has been shown to deplete soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil total nitrogen (STN) stocks. However, research on how soil properties respond to forest conversion to shifting cultivation has produced conflicting results. The conflicting findings suggest that the agricultural system may influence the response of SOC and STN to forest conversion to agriculture, depending on the presence of vegetative cover throughout the year. Due to the unique characteristics of montane evergreen forests (MEF) and banana plantations (BP), SOC and STN response to MEF conversion to BP may differ from existing models. Nevertheless, research on how soil properties are affected by MEF conversion to BP is scarce globally. In order to fill this research gap, the goal of this study was to evaluate how much deforestation for BP affects SOC, STN, and soil quality by analysing these soil parameters in MEF and BP fields down to 1-m depth, using standard profile-based procedures. Contrary to the specified hypothesis that SOC and STN losses would be restricted to the upper 20-cm soil layer, SOC losses were extended to the 40-cm depth layer and STN losses to the 60-cm depth layer. The soils lost 18.56 Mg ha <sup>– 1</sup> (37%) of SOC from the upper 20 cm and 33.15 Mg ha <sup>– 1</sup> (37%) from the upper 40 cm, following MEF conversion to BP. In terms of STN, the upper 20, 40, and 60 cm lost 2.98 (43%), 6.62 (47%), and 8.30 Mg ha <sup>– 1</sup> (44%), respectively. Following MEF conversion to BP, the SOC stratification ratio decreased by 49%, implying a decline in soil quality. Massive exportation of nutrients, reduced C inputs due to complete removal of the arboreal component and crop residues, the erodibility of the soils on the study area’s steep hillslopes, and the potential for banana plantations to increase throughfall kinetic energy, and splash erosion through canopy dripping are thought to be the leading causes of SOC and STN losses. More research is needed to identify the extent to which each cause influences SOC and STN losses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":505,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Balance and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://cbmjournal.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13021-024-00278-w","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Balance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13021-024-00278-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest conversion to agricultural land has been shown to deplete soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil total nitrogen (STN) stocks. However, research on how soil properties respond to forest conversion to shifting cultivation has produced conflicting results. The conflicting findings suggest that the agricultural system may influence the response of SOC and STN to forest conversion to agriculture, depending on the presence of vegetative cover throughout the year. Due to the unique characteristics of montane evergreen forests (MEF) and banana plantations (BP), SOC and STN response to MEF conversion to BP may differ from existing models. Nevertheless, research on how soil properties are affected by MEF conversion to BP is scarce globally. In order to fill this research gap, the goal of this study was to evaluate how much deforestation for BP affects SOC, STN, and soil quality by analysing these soil parameters in MEF and BP fields down to 1-m depth, using standard profile-based procedures. Contrary to the specified hypothesis that SOC and STN losses would be restricted to the upper 20-cm soil layer, SOC losses were extended to the 40-cm depth layer and STN losses to the 60-cm depth layer. The soils lost 18.56 Mg ha – 1 (37%) of SOC from the upper 20 cm and 33.15 Mg ha – 1 (37%) from the upper 40 cm, following MEF conversion to BP. In terms of STN, the upper 20, 40, and 60 cm lost 2.98 (43%), 6.62 (47%), and 8.30 Mg ha – 1 (44%), respectively. Following MEF conversion to BP, the SOC stratification ratio decreased by 49%, implying a decline in soil quality. Massive exportation of nutrients, reduced C inputs due to complete removal of the arboreal component and crop residues, the erodibility of the soils on the study area’s steep hillslopes, and the potential for banana plantations to increase throughfall kinetic energy, and splash erosion through canopy dripping are thought to be the leading causes of SOC and STN losses. More research is needed to identify the extent to which each cause influences SOC and STN losses.

为种植香蕉而砍伐山地常绿林,使土壤有机碳和总氮储存量下降到令人担忧的水平
森林转为农田已被证明会消耗土壤有机碳(SOC)和土壤全氮(STN)储量。然而,关于土壤特性如何应对森林转为轮垦的研究结果却相互矛盾。这些相互矛盾的研究结果表明,农业系统可能会影响 SOC 和 STN 对森林转为农业的反应,这取决于全年是否有植被覆盖。由于山地常绿林(MEF)和香蕉种植园(BP)的独特性,SOC 和 STN 对 MEF 转为 BP 的响应可能与现有模型不同。然而,全球范围内有关土壤特性如何受到 MEF 向 BP 转化的影响的研究还很少。为了填补这一研究空白,本研究的目标是采用标准的剖面分析程序,通过分析 MEF 和 BP 田中深达 1 米的土壤参数,评估因 BP 而砍伐森林对 SOC、STN 和土壤质量的影响。与 SOC 和 STN 损失仅限于土壤上层 20 厘米的假设相反,SOC 的损失扩大到了 40 厘米深的土层,STN 的损失扩大到了 60 厘米深的土层。将 MEF 转化为 BP 后,土壤 20 厘米上层的 SOC 损失为 18.56 兆克/公顷-1(37%),40 厘米上层的 SOC 损失为 33.15 兆克/公顷-1(37%)。就 STN 而言,上部 20、40 和 60 厘米分别损失了 2.98 毫克/公顷(43%)、6.62 毫克/公顷(47%)和 8.30 毫克/公顷-1(44%)。将 MEF 转换为 BP 后,SOC 分层率下降了 49%,这意味着土壤质量下降。养分的大量输出、树栖成分和作物残留物的完全清除导致的碳输入量的减少、研究区域陡峭山坡上土壤的可侵蚀性、香蕉种植园增加径流动能的潜力以及通过树冠滴水造成的飞溅侵蚀被认为是 SOC 和 STN 损失的主要原因。需要进行更多的研究,以确定每种原因对 SOC 和 STN 损失的影响程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Carbon Balance and Management
Carbon Balance and Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Carbon Balance and Management is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of research aimed at developing a comprehensive policy relevant to the understanding of the global carbon cycle. The global carbon cycle involves important couplings between climate, atmospheric CO2 and the terrestrial and oceanic biospheres. The current transformation of the carbon cycle due to changes in climate and atmospheric composition is widely recognized as potentially dangerous for the biosphere and for the well-being of humankind, and therefore monitoring, understanding and predicting the evolution of the carbon cycle in the context of the whole biosphere (both terrestrial and marine) is a challenge to the scientific community. This demands interdisciplinary research and new approaches for studying geographical and temporal distributions of carbon pools and fluxes, control and feedback mechanisms of the carbon-climate system, points of intervention and windows of opportunity for managing the carbon-climate-human system. Carbon Balance and Management is a medium for researchers in the field to convey the results of their research across disciplinary boundaries. Through this dissemination of research, the journal aims to support the work of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and to provide governmental and non-governmental organizations with instantaneous access to continually emerging knowledge, including paradigm shifts and consensual views.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信