How does soil water retention change over time? A three-year field study under several production systems

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Clémence Pirlot, Anne-Catherine Renard, Caroline De Clerck, Aurore Degré
{"title":"How does soil water retention change over time? A three-year field study under several production systems","authors":"Clémence Pirlot,&nbsp;Anne-Catherine Renard,&nbsp;Caroline De Clerck,&nbsp;Aurore Degré","doi":"10.1111/ejss.13558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Agricultural practices and meteorological conditions affect soil structure and soil hydraulic properties. However, their temporal evolution is rarely studied, and even less in the field. Thus, their dynamics are rarely taken into account in models, often leading to inconsistent results and poor decision making. In this study, the temporal evolution of water retention properties and soil structure was monitored over a 3-year period under several contrasting production systems. Soil Water Retention Curves (SWRCs) obtained directly in the field (with soil water content and potential sensors) were compared with theoretical SWRCs predicted by pedotransfer functions (PTFs) and laboratory SWRCs measured on undisturbed samples. Bulk densities were measured every 2 months. Results indicate a high degree of variability in SWRCs over time and between production systems. The results suggest that variations in the soil water retention behaviour can be induced by crop differentiation, weed control, crop residue management, compaction during harvest, or the introduction of temporary grassland. Contrasting climatic conditions between 2021 (water excess), 2022 (severe drought) and 2023 (intermediate) provided a unique opportunity to study the resilience of the crop systems to extreme climatic conditions. Different soil drying dynamics were observed and some agricultural practices were identified as influencing the soil water retention behaviour for at least 2 years. Comparison of SWRCs showed that the theoretical curves obtained from PTFs are not a good representation of the field SWRCs, especially for less conventional agricultural practices. The laboratory curves are closer with similar trends. However, these SWRCs are not optimal for investigating the temporal evolution of water retention properties. This research also shows that agricultural practices and crops can be levers for contributing to greater food resilience against future climatic conditions. Therefore, to assess the relevance of production systems for tomorrow's needs, studies should focus on the impact of multi-cropping systems on water retention dynamics in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"75 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.13558","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural practices and meteorological conditions affect soil structure and soil hydraulic properties. However, their temporal evolution is rarely studied, and even less in the field. Thus, their dynamics are rarely taken into account in models, often leading to inconsistent results and poor decision making. In this study, the temporal evolution of water retention properties and soil structure was monitored over a 3-year period under several contrasting production systems. Soil Water Retention Curves (SWRCs) obtained directly in the field (with soil water content and potential sensors) were compared with theoretical SWRCs predicted by pedotransfer functions (PTFs) and laboratory SWRCs measured on undisturbed samples. Bulk densities were measured every 2 months. Results indicate a high degree of variability in SWRCs over time and between production systems. The results suggest that variations in the soil water retention behaviour can be induced by crop differentiation, weed control, crop residue management, compaction during harvest, or the introduction of temporary grassland. Contrasting climatic conditions between 2021 (water excess), 2022 (severe drought) and 2023 (intermediate) provided a unique opportunity to study the resilience of the crop systems to extreme climatic conditions. Different soil drying dynamics were observed and some agricultural practices were identified as influencing the soil water retention behaviour for at least 2 years. Comparison of SWRCs showed that the theoretical curves obtained from PTFs are not a good representation of the field SWRCs, especially for less conventional agricultural practices. The laboratory curves are closer with similar trends. However, these SWRCs are not optimal for investigating the temporal evolution of water retention properties. This research also shows that agricultural practices and crops can be levers for contributing to greater food resilience against future climatic conditions. Therefore, to assess the relevance of production systems for tomorrow's needs, studies should focus on the impact of multi-cropping systems on water retention dynamics in the field.

土壤保水性随时间如何变化?在几种生产系统下进行的为期三年的实地研究
农业生产方式和气象条件会影响土壤结构和土壤水力特性。然而,对它们的时间演变却很少进行研究,实地研究就更少了。因此,模型中很少考虑它们的动态变化,往往导致结果不一致和决策失误。在这项研究中,对几种不同生产系统下土壤保水特性和土壤结构的时间演变进行了为期 3 年的监测。将直接在田间获得的土壤保水曲线(使用土壤含水量和水势传感器)与根据步移函数(PTF)预测的理论土壤保水曲线以及在未扰动样本上测量的实验室土壤保水曲线进行了比较。体积密度每两个月测量一次。结果表明,随着时间的推移以及不同生产系统之间,SWRC 的变化程度很高。结果表明,作物分化、杂草控制、作物残留物管理、收割时的压实或临时草地的引入都会导致土壤保水性能的变化。2021 年(水分过剩)、2022 年(严重干旱)和 2023 年(中间干旱)之间的气候条件对比为研究作物系统对极端气候条件的适应能力提供了一个独特的机会。研究人员观察到了不同的土壤干燥动态,并确定了一些影响土壤保水行为至少两年的农业耕作方式。对 SWRC 进行比较后发现,从 PTF 中获得的理论曲线并不能很好地反映田间 SWRC,尤其是对于不太传统的农业耕作方式。实验室曲线更接近,趋势相似。不过,这些 SWRC 并不是研究保水特性时间演变的最佳方法。这项研究还表明,农业生产方式和农作物可以成为提高粮食抵御未来气候条件能力的杠杆。因此,为了评估生产系统对未来需求的相关性,研究应侧重于多作物系统对田间保水动态的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信