Stepwise cell culture process intensification for high-productivity and cost-effective commercial manufacturing of a Mabcalin™ bispecifics

IF 3.7 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Jinliang Zhang , Weijia Cao , Le Yu , Yanyan Cui , Kecui Xu , Jun Tian , Sebastian Hogl , Hitto Kaufmann , Weichang Zhou , Sherry Gu
{"title":"Stepwise cell culture process intensification for high-productivity and cost-effective commercial manufacturing of a Mabcalin™ bispecifics","authors":"Jinliang Zhang ,&nbsp;Weijia Cao ,&nbsp;Le Yu ,&nbsp;Yanyan Cui ,&nbsp;Kecui Xu ,&nbsp;Jun Tian ,&nbsp;Sebastian Hogl ,&nbsp;Hitto Kaufmann ,&nbsp;Weichang Zhou ,&nbsp;Sherry Gu","doi":"10.1016/j.bej.2024.109476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Process intensification and media optimization, as a crucial step for improving productivity and manufacturing cost of goods (COG), set the stage for commercialization readiness and redefine the landscape for patient access. This study described a stepwise approach to explore different intensified fed-batch processes along with optimized cell culture media for the production of a Mabcalin™ bispecifics. Initially, by leveraging perfusion expansion, intensified fed-batch (IFB) with an inoculation density of 10.3 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/mL was developed to produce 6.1 g/L of products, compared to 3.9 g/L from the original traditional fed-batch (TFB). Following the IFB conversion, a high-performing production medium, MagniCHO™, was chosen to substitute the original one, which further boosted the titer to 9.1 g/L. The result underscored the significance of developing an optimized cell culture media for intensified cultivation. Furthermore, the approach of ultra-intensified intermittent-perfusion fed-batch was utilized, raising the seeding density to 73.6 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/mL. A final harvest titer of 24.5 g/L was recorded. Additionally, manufacturing COG was calculated to evaluate how process intensification could lead to improved manufacturing cost-effectiveness, with up to 71 % COG reduction attainable with the UI-IPFB process. This study demonstrated that even for difficult-to-express modalities, applying a strategic development approach including process intensification and media optimization could effectively improve manufacturing efficiency and COG competitiveness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8766,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Engineering Journal","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 109476"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369703X24002638","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Process intensification and media optimization, as a crucial step for improving productivity and manufacturing cost of goods (COG), set the stage for commercialization readiness and redefine the landscape for patient access. This study described a stepwise approach to explore different intensified fed-batch processes along with optimized cell culture media for the production of a Mabcalin™ bispecifics. Initially, by leveraging perfusion expansion, intensified fed-batch (IFB) with an inoculation density of 10.3 × 106 cells/mL was developed to produce 6.1 g/L of products, compared to 3.9 g/L from the original traditional fed-batch (TFB). Following the IFB conversion, a high-performing production medium, MagniCHO™, was chosen to substitute the original one, which further boosted the titer to 9.1 g/L. The result underscored the significance of developing an optimized cell culture media for intensified cultivation. Furthermore, the approach of ultra-intensified intermittent-perfusion fed-batch was utilized, raising the seeding density to 73.6 × 106 cells/mL. A final harvest titer of 24.5 g/L was recorded. Additionally, manufacturing COG was calculated to evaluate how process intensification could lead to improved manufacturing cost-effectiveness, with up to 71 % COG reduction attainable with the UI-IPFB process. This study demonstrated that even for difficult-to-express modalities, applying a strategic development approach including process intensification and media optimization could effectively improve manufacturing efficiency and COG competitiveness.

逐步强化细胞培养工艺,实现高生产率和高成本效益的马布卡林™双特异性药物商业化生产
工艺强化和培养基优化是提高生产率和制造成本(COG)的关键步骤,为商业化做好了准备,并重新定义了患者可及性的前景。本研究介绍了一种循序渐进的方法,用于探索不同的强化喂料批次工艺和优化细胞培养基,以生产马巴卡林™双特异性药物。最初,通过利用灌流扩增,开发出了接种密度为 10.3 × 106 cells/mL 的强化喂料批次(IFB),生产出 6.1 克/升的产品,而原来的传统喂料批次(TFB)为 3.9 克/升。在进行 IFB 转换后,选择了一种高性能的生产培养基 MagniCHO™ 来替代原来的培养基,从而将滴度进一步提高到 9.1 克/升。这一结果凸显了开发优化细胞培养基对强化培养的重要意义。此外,还采用了超强化间歇灌注分批进行培养的方法,将播种密度提高到 73.6 × 106 cells/mL。最终收获滴度为 24.5 克/升。此外,还计算了制造 COG,以评估工艺强化如何提高制造成本效益,UI-IPFB 工艺可将 COG 降低 71%。这项研究表明,即使对于难以表达的模式,采用包括工艺强化和介质优化在内的战略开发方法也能有效提高生产效率和 COG 竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biochemical Engineering Journal
Biochemical Engineering Journal 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
380
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Biochemical Engineering Journal aims to promote progress in the crucial chemical engineering aspects of the development of biological processes associated with everything from raw materials preparation to product recovery relevant to industries as diverse as medical/healthcare, industrial biotechnology, and environmental biotechnology. The Journal welcomes full length original research papers, short communications, and review papers* in the following research fields: Biocatalysis (enzyme or microbial) and biotransformations, including immobilized biocatalyst preparation and kinetics Biosensors and Biodevices including biofabrication and novel fuel cell development Bioseparations including scale-up and protein refolding/renaturation Environmental Bioengineering including bioconversion, bioremediation, and microbial fuel cells Bioreactor Systems including characterization, optimization and scale-up Bioresources and Biorefinery Engineering including biomass conversion, biofuels, bioenergy, and optimization Industrial Biotechnology including specialty chemicals, platform chemicals and neutraceuticals Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering including bioartificial organs, cell encapsulation, and controlled release Cell Culture Engineering (plant, animal or insect cells) including viral vectors, monoclonal antibodies, recombinant proteins, vaccines, and secondary metabolites Cell Therapies and Stem Cells including pluripotent, mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cells; immunotherapies; tissue-specific differentiation; and cryopreservation Metabolic Engineering, Systems and Synthetic Biology including OMICS, bioinformatics, in silico biology, and metabolic flux analysis Protein Engineering including enzyme engineering and directed evolution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信