Comparative analysis: Exergetic and economic assessment of LNG cold energy power generation systems with different cold utilization methods

IF 5.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
{"title":"Comparative analysis: Exergetic and economic assessment of LNG cold energy power generation systems with different cold utilization methods","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Harnessing the cold energy inherent in LNG transportation processes can significantly mitigate energy wastage. Employing an innovative incremental analysis methodology, this study scrutinizes six LNG cold energy power generation systems, featuring a newly proposed parallel and cascade combined cycle (PAC) system. A novel approach that setting the minimum pressure within the systems higher than atmospheric levels has been adopted, for the optimal working fluid selection. The net power output (<em>W</em><sub>net</sub>) of the direct expansion (DC) system registers at −129.51 kW, while both the Single-Stage Organic Rankine Cycle (SORC) and Combined Cycle (CC) systems yield <em>W</em><sub>net</sub> of 2868.46 kW and 3081.46 kW with R32 as working fluid. Despite the lower available exergy extraction of the working fluid, the CC system outperforms due to its superior efficiency in converting pressure exergy into power output. Sensitivity analysis suggests the optimal <em>T</em><sub>con</sub> in CC is limited by the normal boiling point temperature (NBPT) of working fluid, while that in SORC remains unrestricted. The maximum <em>W</em><sub>net</sub> of two-stage Parallel Combined Cycle (PCC) and Cascade Combined Cycle (CCC) can reach 3291.65 kW and 4268.78 with the optimal working fluid combinations R32 + propane, and ethane + propane. The reason <em>W</em><sub>net</sub> of CCC outperforms is the cascade utilization of LNG cold exergy enables the working fluid in its second stage obtains significantly 9.49 times higher amount of exergy compared to PCC. Through sensitivity analysis, while <em>T</em><sub>con1</sub> mostly predominates the performance of PCC, both <em>T</em><sub>con1</sub> and <em>T</em><sub>con2</sub> exert substantial influence on CCC. For the three-stage PAC, its <em>W</em><sub>net</sub> can reach the highest 4700.82 kW with ethane + propane + propane. It is because the PAC not only utilizes LNG’s cold exergy in a cascaded manner, but also obtains the exergy from working fluid. According to economic analysis, the PAC system exhibits an advantage with the highest annul total net income (<em>ATNI).</em> And the CC emerges as a cost-effective choice if the irreversible losses and <em>W</em><sub>net</sub> are not considered. According to innovatively explores about the impact of direct expansion and changes in NG outlet pressure on working fluid selection and economic feasibility, it shows the optimal combinations remain the same, and the systems incorporating a direct expansion component with lower NG outlet pressure demonstrate a more economically advantageous solution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23062,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904924004621","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Harnessing the cold energy inherent in LNG transportation processes can significantly mitigate energy wastage. Employing an innovative incremental analysis methodology, this study scrutinizes six LNG cold energy power generation systems, featuring a newly proposed parallel and cascade combined cycle (PAC) system. A novel approach that setting the minimum pressure within the systems higher than atmospheric levels has been adopted, for the optimal working fluid selection. The net power output (Wnet) of the direct expansion (DC) system registers at −129.51 kW, while both the Single-Stage Organic Rankine Cycle (SORC) and Combined Cycle (CC) systems yield Wnet of 2868.46 kW and 3081.46 kW with R32 as working fluid. Despite the lower available exergy extraction of the working fluid, the CC system outperforms due to its superior efficiency in converting pressure exergy into power output. Sensitivity analysis suggests the optimal Tcon in CC is limited by the normal boiling point temperature (NBPT) of working fluid, while that in SORC remains unrestricted. The maximum Wnet of two-stage Parallel Combined Cycle (PCC) and Cascade Combined Cycle (CCC) can reach 3291.65 kW and 4268.78 with the optimal working fluid combinations R32 + propane, and ethane + propane. The reason Wnet of CCC outperforms is the cascade utilization of LNG cold exergy enables the working fluid in its second stage obtains significantly 9.49 times higher amount of exergy compared to PCC. Through sensitivity analysis, while Tcon1 mostly predominates the performance of PCC, both Tcon1 and Tcon2 exert substantial influence on CCC. For the three-stage PAC, its Wnet can reach the highest 4700.82 kW with ethane + propane + propane. It is because the PAC not only utilizes LNG’s cold exergy in a cascaded manner, but also obtains the exergy from working fluid. According to economic analysis, the PAC system exhibits an advantage with the highest annul total net income (ATNI). And the CC emerges as a cost-effective choice if the irreversible losses and Wnet are not considered. According to innovatively explores about the impact of direct expansion and changes in NG outlet pressure on working fluid selection and economic feasibility, it shows the optimal combinations remain the same, and the systems incorporating a direct expansion component with lower NG outlet pressure demonstrate a more economically advantageous solution.

比较分析:采用不同冷利用方法的液化天然气冷能发电系统的能效和经济评估
利用液化天然气运输过程中固有的冷能可以大大减少能源浪费。本研究采用创新的增量分析方法,仔细研究了六个液化天然气冷能发电系统,其中包括一个新提出的并联和级联联合循环(PAC)系统。为了优化工作流体的选择,采用了一种新方法,将系统内的最低压力设定为高于大气压水平。直接膨胀(DC)系统的净功率输出(Wnet)为 -129.51 kW,而单级有机郎肯循环(SORC)和联合循环(CC)系统在使用 R32 作为工作液时的净功率输出(Wnet)分别为 2868.46 kW 和 3081.46 kW。尽管工作流体的可用放能提取率较低,但由于 CC 系统将压力放能转化为功率输出的效率更高,因此其性能优于 SORC 系统。敏感性分析表明,CC 系统的最佳 Tcon 受限于工作流体的正常沸点温度 (NBPT),而 SORC 系统的最佳 Tcon 则不受限制。在 R32 + 丙烷和乙烷 + 丙烷的最佳工作流组合下,两级并联联合循环(PCC)和级联联合循环(CCC)的最大净功率分别达到 3291.65 千瓦和 4268.78 千瓦。CCC 的 Wnet 性能优于 PCC 的原因在于,LNG 冷能量的级联利用使其第二级工作流体获得的能量是 PCC 的 9.49 倍。通过敏感性分析,虽然 Tcon1 主要影响 PCC 的性能,但 Tcon1 和 Tcon2 对 CCC 都有很大影响。在三级 PAC 中,乙烷 + 丙烷 + 丙烷的 Wnet 最高可达 4700.82 kW。这是因为 PAC 不仅以级联方式利用了液化天然气的冷能,还从工作流体中获取了热能。根据经济分析,PAC 系统具有最高年总净收入 (ATNI) 的优势。而如果不考虑不可逆损失和 Wnet,CC 则是一种具有成本效益的选择。通过对直接膨胀和 NG 出口压力变化对工作液选择和经济可行性的影响进行创新性探索,结果表明最佳组合保持不变,而包含直接膨胀组件和较低 NG 出口压力的系统则表现出更大的经济优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress Chemical Engineering-Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.40%
发文量
327
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Thermal Science and Engineering Progress (TSEP) publishes original, high-quality research articles that span activities ranging from fundamental scientific research and discussion of the more controversial thermodynamic theories, to developments in thermal engineering that are in many instances examples of the way scientists and engineers are addressing the challenges facing a growing population – smart cities and global warming – maximising thermodynamic efficiencies and minimising all heat losses. It is intended that these will be of current relevance and interest to industry, academia and other practitioners. It is evident that many specialised journals in thermal and, to some extent, in fluid disciplines tend to focus on topics that can be classified as fundamental in nature, or are ‘applied’ and near-market. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress will bridge the gap between these two areas, allowing authors to make an easy choice, should they or a journal editor feel that their papers are ‘out of scope’ when considering other journals. The range of topics covered by Thermal Science and Engineering Progress addresses the rapid rate of development being made in thermal transfer processes as they affect traditional fields, and important growth in the topical research areas of aerospace, thermal biological and medical systems, electronics and nano-technologies, renewable energy systems, food production (including agriculture), and the need to minimise man-made thermal impacts on climate change. Review articles on appropriate topics for TSEP are encouraged, although until TSEP is fully established, these will be limited in number. Before submitting such articles, please contact one of the Editors, or a member of the Editorial Advisory Board with an outline of your proposal and your expertise in the area of your review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信