Improving readability and comprehension levels of otolaryngology patient education materials using ChatGPT

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Allison D. Oliva, Luke J. Pasick, Michael E. Hoffer, David E. Rosow
{"title":"Improving readability and comprehension levels of otolaryngology patient education materials using ChatGPT","authors":"Allison D. Oliva,&nbsp;Luke J. Pasick,&nbsp;Michael E. Hoffer,&nbsp;David E. Rosow","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>A publicly available large language learning model platform may help determine current readability levels of otolaryngology patient education materials, as well as translate these materials to the recommended 6th-grade and 8th-grade reading levels.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Cross-sectional analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Online using large language learning model, ChatGPT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Patient Education pages of the American Laryngological Association (ALA) and American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) websites were accessed. Materials were input into ChatGPT (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA; version 3.5) and Microsoft Word (Microsoft, Redmond, WA; version 16.74). Programs calculated Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) scores, with higher scores indicating easier readability, and Flesch-Kincaid (FK) grade levels, estimating U.S. grade level required to understand text. ChatGPT was prompted to “translate to a 5th-grade reading level” and provide new scores. Scores were compared for statistical differences, as well as differences between ChatGPT and Word gradings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patient education materials were reviewed and 37 ALA and 72 AAO-HNS topics were translated. Overall FRE scores and FK grades demonstrated significant improvements following translation of materials, as scored by ChatGPT (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Word also scored significant improvements in FRE and FK following translation by ChatGPT for AAO-HNS materials overall (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) but not for individual topics or for subspecialty-specific categories. Compared with Word, ChatGPT significantly exaggerated the change in FRE grades and FK scores (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Otolaryngology patient education materials were found to be written at higher reading levels than recommended. Artificial intelligence may prove to be a useful resource to simplify content to make it more accessible to patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"45 6","pages":"Article 104502"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924002886","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

A publicly available large language learning model platform may help determine current readability levels of otolaryngology patient education materials, as well as translate these materials to the recommended 6th-grade and 8th-grade reading levels.

Study design

Cross-sectional analysis.

Setting

Online using large language learning model, ChatGPT.

Methods

The Patient Education pages of the American Laryngological Association (ALA) and American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) websites were accessed. Materials were input into ChatGPT (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA; version 3.5) and Microsoft Word (Microsoft, Redmond, WA; version 16.74). Programs calculated Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) scores, with higher scores indicating easier readability, and Flesch-Kincaid (FK) grade levels, estimating U.S. grade level required to understand text. ChatGPT was prompted to “translate to a 5th-grade reading level” and provide new scores. Scores were compared for statistical differences, as well as differences between ChatGPT and Word gradings.

Results

Patient education materials were reviewed and 37 ALA and 72 AAO-HNS topics were translated. Overall FRE scores and FK grades demonstrated significant improvements following translation of materials, as scored by ChatGPT (p < 0.001). Word also scored significant improvements in FRE and FK following translation by ChatGPT for AAO-HNS materials overall (p < 0.001) but not for individual topics or for subspecialty-specific categories. Compared with Word, ChatGPT significantly exaggerated the change in FRE grades and FK scores (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Otolaryngology patient education materials were found to be written at higher reading levels than recommended. Artificial intelligence may prove to be a useful resource to simplify content to make it more accessible to patients.

使用 ChatGPT 提高耳鼻喉科患者教育材料的可读性和理解水平
研究设计横断面分析设置在线使用大型语言学习模型 ChatGPT方法访问美国喉科学协会(ALA)和美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会(AAO-HNS)网站的患者教育页面。将材料输入 ChatGPT(OpenAI,加利福尼亚州旧金山;3.5 版)和 Microsoft Word(Microsoft,华盛顿州雷德蒙德;16.74 版)。程序计算弗莱什阅读容易度(FRE)分数,分数越高表示越容易阅读,同时计算弗莱什-金凯德(FK)年级水平,估计理解文本所需的美国年级水平。ChatGPT 会被提示 "翻译成五年级的阅读水平",并提供新的分数。对分数的统计差异以及 ChatGPT 和 Word 分级之间的差异进行比较。结果审阅了患者教育材料,翻译了 37 个 ALA 和 72 个 AAO-HNS 主题。根据 ChatGPT 的评分,翻译材料后 FRE 总分和 FK 等级均有显著提高(p < 0.001)。通过 ChatGPT 翻译 AAO-HNS 资料后,Word 的 FRE 和 FK 分数也有明显提高(p < 0.001),但个别主题或特定亚专科类别的 FRE 和 FK 分数没有提高。与 Word 相比,ChatGPT 明显夸大了 FRE 分数和 FK 分数的变化(p < 0.001)。人工智能可能被证明是一种有用的资源,可以简化内容,使患者更容易理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信