{"title":"New onset status epilepticus and its long-term outcome: A cohort study","authors":"Sharath Adiga , Ravindranadh Chowdary Mundlamuri , Ajay Asranna , Lakshminarayanapuram Gopal Vishwanathan , Kenchaiah Raghavendra , Nandakumar Dalavaikodihalli Nanjaiah , PV Prathyusah , Karthik Kulanthaivelu , Sanjib Sinha","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>New onset status epilepticus (NOSE), a subtype of status epilepticus, is a neurological emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to analyze the phenotypic spectrum and outcomes of patients presenting with NOSE.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective and retrospective descriptive study included patients presenting with NOSE over a 10-year period. Data collected included patient demographics, phenotypic characteristics of SE and its etiology, Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS), SE classification Axis-II, and Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at admission and discharge. Functional outcomes and seizure status were assessed at least 6 months post-discharge. Prognostic factors for mortality and the development of epilepsy were also analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 208 patients were included, with a mean age of 41.97 ± 21.66 years, and a male predominance (57.1 %). Focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures were observed in 47.5 % of patients. The etiology was acute symptomatic in 35.57 % and remote symptomatic in 24 %. The median hospital stay was 4 days (range: 2.25–10.75 days). The mortality rate was 26.5 %, and 23 % of patients developed epilepsy with a median follow-up of 9 months. Higher age (≥ 50 years), elevated STESS, ICU admission, use of anesthetic agents, refractory status epilepticus (RSE), and new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) were significant risk factors for mortality (p<0.05). The development of epilepsy was associated with a higher number of antiseizure medications (ASM) at discharge, ICU admission, use of anesthetic agents, RSE, and NORSE (p<0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>NOSE is a neurological emergency with a variable etiology and significant long-term consequences. Approximately one-fourth of patients presenting with NOSE died, and another quarter developed epilepsy during a median follow-up of 9 months. Identifying and addressing the predictors of mortality and epilepsy development following NOSE may improve long-term outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 107442"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124001578","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
New onset status epilepticus (NOSE), a subtype of status epilepticus, is a neurological emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to analyze the phenotypic spectrum and outcomes of patients presenting with NOSE.
Methods
This prospective and retrospective descriptive study included patients presenting with NOSE over a 10-year period. Data collected included patient demographics, phenotypic characteristics of SE and its etiology, Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS), SE classification Axis-II, and Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at admission and discharge. Functional outcomes and seizure status were assessed at least 6 months post-discharge. Prognostic factors for mortality and the development of epilepsy were also analyzed.
Results
A total of 208 patients were included, with a mean age of 41.97 ± 21.66 years, and a male predominance (57.1 %). Focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures were observed in 47.5 % of patients. The etiology was acute symptomatic in 35.57 % and remote symptomatic in 24 %. The median hospital stay was 4 days (range: 2.25–10.75 days). The mortality rate was 26.5 %, and 23 % of patients developed epilepsy with a median follow-up of 9 months. Higher age (≥ 50 years), elevated STESS, ICU admission, use of anesthetic agents, refractory status epilepticus (RSE), and new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) were significant risk factors for mortality (p<0.05). The development of epilepsy was associated with a higher number of antiseizure medications (ASM) at discharge, ICU admission, use of anesthetic agents, RSE, and NORSE (p<0.05).
Conclusion
NOSE is a neurological emergency with a variable etiology and significant long-term consequences. Approximately one-fourth of patients presenting with NOSE died, and another quarter developed epilepsy during a median follow-up of 9 months. Identifying and addressing the predictors of mortality and epilepsy development following NOSE may improve long-term outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Epilepsy Research provides for publication of high quality articles in both basic and clinical epilepsy research, with a special emphasis on translational research that ultimately relates to epilepsy as a human condition. The journal is intended to provide a forum for reporting the best and most rigorous epilepsy research from all disciplines ranging from biophysics and molecular biology to epidemiological and psychosocial research. As such the journal will publish original papers relevant to epilepsy from any scientific discipline and also studies of a multidisciplinary nature. Clinical and experimental research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches to the study of epilepsy and its treatment are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant clinical or experimental relevance, and interest to a multidisciplinary audience in the broad arena of epilepsy. Review articles focused on any topic of epilepsy research will also be considered, but only if they present an exceptionally clear synthesis of current knowledge and future directions of a research area, based on a critical assessment of the available data or on hypotheses that are likely to stimulate more critical thinking and further advances in an area of epilepsy research.