Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device into the bladder complicated by stone formation an exceptional complication: case report and literature review.

IF 2.2 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Hanane Houmaid, Karam Harou, Bouchra Fakhir, Ahlam Bassir, Lahcen Boukhanni, Abderrahim Aboulfalah, Hamid Asmouki, Abderraouf Soummani
{"title":"Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device into the bladder complicated by stone formation an exceptional complication: case report and literature review.","authors":"Hanane Houmaid, Karam Harou, Bouchra Fakhir, Ahlam Bassir, Lahcen Boukhanni, Abderrahim Aboulfalah, Hamid Asmouki, Abderraouf Soummani","doi":"10.1186/s40834-024-00302-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We report a rare and unusual case of intravesical migration of an intrauterine device with stone formation. The intrauterine device (IUD) is the most common method of reversible contraception in women. However, its insertion is not without risk, it can cause early or late complications. IUD can perforate the uterus wall and migrate into adjacent structures.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 35 year-old female 5 gravid, 4 para has been benefited from intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) 5 years ago, she was presented to gynecological consultation for chronic pelvic pain with urinary symptoms. There was history of a good IUD insertion 5 years ago, considered expelled after one month of its pose. Physical examination was normal, but a pelvic ultrasound and a plain abdominal radiography allowed the detection of an IUD outside the uterine cavity, but inside bladder. A diagnostic and therapeutic cystoscopy was performed, and the IUD with calculus was successfully removed. There were no postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case is reported to highlight and to reiterate the need to think about one of the rare complication of IUD insertion, which every practitioner must know, it's the transuterovesical migration, before concluding wrongly to its expulsion. It's a consequence of, non-compliance with the rules for inserting an IUD and poor monitoring. The evolution towards calcification is a certain consequence; its screening involves rigorous clinical monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11351088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-024-00302-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We report a rare and unusual case of intravesical migration of an intrauterine device with stone formation. The intrauterine device (IUD) is the most common method of reversible contraception in women. However, its insertion is not without risk, it can cause early or late complications. IUD can perforate the uterus wall and migrate into adjacent structures.

Case presentation: A 35 year-old female 5 gravid, 4 para has been benefited from intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) 5 years ago, she was presented to gynecological consultation for chronic pelvic pain with urinary symptoms. There was history of a good IUD insertion 5 years ago, considered expelled after one month of its pose. Physical examination was normal, but a pelvic ultrasound and a plain abdominal radiography allowed the detection of an IUD outside the uterine cavity, but inside bladder. A diagnostic and therapeutic cystoscopy was performed, and the IUD with calculus was successfully removed. There were no postoperative complications.

Conclusion: This case is reported to highlight and to reiterate the need to think about one of the rare complication of IUD insertion, which every practitioner must know, it's the transuterovesical migration, before concluding wrongly to its expulsion. It's a consequence of, non-compliance with the rules for inserting an IUD and poor monitoring. The evolution towards calcification is a certain consequence; its screening involves rigorous clinical monitoring.

宫内避孕器移位至膀胱并伴有结石形成的特殊并发症:病例报告和文献综述。
背景:我们报告了一例罕见的宫内节育器膀胱内移位并形成结石的病例。宫内节育器(IUD)是妇女最常用的可逆避孕方法。然而,放置宫内节育器并非没有风险,它可能导致早期或晚期并发症。宫内节育器可能会穿透子宫壁并移入邻近结构:一位 35 岁的女性,孕 5 个月,产 4 个月,5 年前开始使用宫内避孕器(IUCD)。5 年前,她曾放置过一个良好的宫内节育器,但在放置 1 个月后被认为已被排出。体格检查正常,但盆腔超声波检查和腹部平片检查发现宫内节育器位于子宫腔外,但在膀胱内。经过膀胱镜检查和治疗,成功取出了带有结石的宫内节育器。术后无并发症:本病例的报告旨在强调和重申,在错误地得出宫内节育器取出的结论之前,必须考虑到宫内节育器置入后的一种罕见并发症,即经子宫颈移位。这是不遵守放置宫内节育器规则和监测不力的后果。钙化的演变是必然的结果;其筛查需要严格的临床监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信