Long-term effects of alcohol-avoidance training: Do changes in approach bias predict who will remain abstinent?

IF 3 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Edwin J. Schenkel, Robert Schöneck, Eni S. Becker, Reinout W. Wiers, Johannes Lindenmeyer, Mike Rinck
{"title":"Long-term effects of alcohol-avoidance training: Do changes in approach bias predict who will remain abstinent?","authors":"Edwin J. Schenkel,&nbsp;Robert Schöneck,&nbsp;Eni S. Becker,&nbsp;Reinout W. Wiers,&nbsp;Johannes Lindenmeyer,&nbsp;Mike Rinck","doi":"10.1111/acer.15431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) tend to selectively approach alcohol cues in the environment, demonstrating an alcohol-approach bias. Alcohol-approach-bias modification (Alcohol-ApBM) effectively increases abstinence rates in patients with AUD when added to abstinence-focused treatment, but the evidence for its proposed working mechanism (reduction of the alcohol-approach bias) is limited. Moreover, not all patients benefit from Alcohol-ApBM, and previous research did not identify reliable pretreatment predictors of Alcohol-ApBM effectiveness. Therefore, the current study focused on learning processes during the Alcohol-ApBM training itself. Specifically, we examined whether changes in approach-avoidance tendencies over the course of Alcohol-ApBM would predict abstinence after inpatient treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The training data of 543 AUD patients in Germany (70% male, <i>M</i> = 47.96, SD = 9.08), receiving Alcohol-ApBM training during inpatient treatment, were used to examine whether various aspects of learning during training predicted abstinence 1 year after treatment discharge, both separately and in interaction with potential sociodemographic and clinical moderators of Alcohol-ApBM effectiveness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, successful learning across six Alcohol-ApBM training sessions was observed; that is, the approach tendency toward alcoholic stimuli was reduced over time. However, none of the examined learning parameters were predictive of abstinence, neither separately nor in combination with clinical or sociodemographic variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Previous studies have shown that Alcohol-ApBM is an effective add-on to abstinence-focused treatment for AUD, and this study showed that learning took place during Alcohol-ApBM training. However, specific learning parameters during training did not predict abstinence 1 year after treatment discharge. Therefore, we cannot specify which patients are most likely to benefit from ApBM with regard to abstinence after 1 year.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":"48 10","pages":"1979-1990"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acer.15431","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.15431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) tend to selectively approach alcohol cues in the environment, demonstrating an alcohol-approach bias. Alcohol-approach-bias modification (Alcohol-ApBM) effectively increases abstinence rates in patients with AUD when added to abstinence-focused treatment, but the evidence for its proposed working mechanism (reduction of the alcohol-approach bias) is limited. Moreover, not all patients benefit from Alcohol-ApBM, and previous research did not identify reliable pretreatment predictors of Alcohol-ApBM effectiveness. Therefore, the current study focused on learning processes during the Alcohol-ApBM training itself. Specifically, we examined whether changes in approach-avoidance tendencies over the course of Alcohol-ApBM would predict abstinence after inpatient treatment.

Methods

The training data of 543 AUD patients in Germany (70% male, M = 47.96, SD = 9.08), receiving Alcohol-ApBM training during inpatient treatment, were used to examine whether various aspects of learning during training predicted abstinence 1 year after treatment discharge, both separately and in interaction with potential sociodemographic and clinical moderators of Alcohol-ApBM effectiveness.

Results

Overall, successful learning across six Alcohol-ApBM training sessions was observed; that is, the approach tendency toward alcoholic stimuli was reduced over time. However, none of the examined learning parameters were predictive of abstinence, neither separately nor in combination with clinical or sociodemographic variables.

Conclusions

Previous studies have shown that Alcohol-ApBM is an effective add-on to abstinence-focused treatment for AUD, and this study showed that learning took place during Alcohol-ApBM training. However, specific learning parameters during training did not predict abstinence 1 year after treatment discharge. Therefore, we cannot specify which patients are most likely to benefit from ApBM with regard to abstinence after 1 year.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

避酒训练的长期效果:方法偏差的变化能预测哪些人将继续戒酒吗?
背景:酒精使用障碍(AUD)患者倾向于选择性地接近环境中的酒精线索,表现出酒精接近偏差。酒精接近偏差修正法(Alcohol-ApBM)在添加到以戒酒为重点的治疗中时,能有效提高 AUD 患者的戒酒率,但其提出的工作机制(减少酒精接近偏差)的证据有限。此外,并非所有患者都能从酒精-促进戒酒治疗中获益,而且之前的研究也未发现酒精-促进戒酒治疗效果的可靠预测因素。因此,本研究重点关注酒精-ApBM 训练本身的学习过程。具体来说,我们研究了在酒精-ApBM训练过程中,接近-回避倾向的变化是否能预测住院治疗后的戒断情况:方法:我们利用德国 543 名 AUD 患者(70% 为男性,M=47.96,SD=9.08)在住院治疗期间接受 Alcohol-ApBM 培训的培训数据,研究了培训期间学习的各个方面是否能预测出院治疗 1 年后的戒断情况,包括单独预测以及与 Alcohol-ApBM 效果的潜在社会人口学和临床调节因素相互作用的情况:结果:总体而言,在六次酒精-ApBM训练中都观察到了成功的学习;也就是说,随着时间的推移,对酒精刺激的接近倾向降低了。然而,无论是单独还是与临床或社会人口变量相结合,所考察的学习参数都不能预测戒酒情况:以往的研究表明,酒精-ApBM 是以戒酒为重点的 AUD 治疗的有效附加疗法。然而,训练期间的特定学习参数并不能预测治疗出院一年后的戒断情况。因此,我们无法明确哪些患者最有可能在一年后的戒酒方面受益于ApBM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信