Physical Health Checks and Follow-Up Care in Deprived and Ethnically Diverse People With Severe Mental Illness: Co-Designed Recommendations for Better Care

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Easter Joury, Edward Beveridge, Judith Littlejohns, Angela Burns, Gemma Copsey, Justin Philips, Shanaz Begum, David Shiers, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Charlotte Klass, Jackie Chin
{"title":"Physical Health Checks and Follow-Up Care in Deprived and Ethnically Diverse People With Severe Mental Illness: Co-Designed Recommendations for Better Care","authors":"Easter Joury,&nbsp;Edward Beveridge,&nbsp;Judith Littlejohns,&nbsp;Angela Burns,&nbsp;Gemma Copsey,&nbsp;Justin Philips,&nbsp;Shanaz Begum,&nbsp;David Shiers,&nbsp;Carolyn Chew-Graham,&nbsp;Charlotte Klass,&nbsp;Jackie Chin","doi":"10.1111/hex.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There is wide variation in premature mortality rates in adults with severe mental illness (SMI) across London, with Tower Hamlets (a highly deprived and ethnically diverse area) scoring the highest.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To identify examples of best practice and co-design recommendations for improving physical health checks and follow-up care amongst people with SMI in Tower Hamlets.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data were collected through online questionnaires (using SMI physical health best practice checklists), one-on-one interviews (<i>n</i> = 7) and focus groups (<i>n</i> = 3) with general practices, secondary mental health services, commissioners and leads of community services and public health programmes, experts by experience and community, voluntary and social enterprise organisations in Tower Hamlets. Data were analysed using deductive and inductive thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-two participants representing 15 general practices (out of 32), secondary mental health services, commissioners and public health leads completed the online questionnaires. Twenty-one participants took part in interviews and focus groups. Examples of best practice included cleaning and validating the SMI register regularly by general practices, knowing the number of patients who had been offered and/or received physical health checks, having clear pathways to community and specialist care services, using various communication methods and having a key performance indicator (KPI) for tailored smoking cessation services for people with SMI. Recommendations included adopting evidence-informed frameworks for risk stratification and utilising the wider primary care workforce with specific training to follow up on results, offer interventions and support navigating pathways and taking up follow-up care. Incentivising schemes were needed to deliver additional physical health check components such as oral health, cancer screening, Covid-19 vaccination and sexual health checks. Including KPIs in other community services' specifications with reference to SMI people was warranted. Further engagement with experts by experience and staff training were needed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The present initiative identified best practice examples and co-designed recommendations for improving physical health checks and follow-up care in deprived and ethnically diverse people with SMI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>This initiative was supported by three experts with experience, and two community organisations, who were involved in data curation and interpretation, development of recommendations and/or dissemination activities including writing this manuscript.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11350427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is wide variation in premature mortality rates in adults with severe mental illness (SMI) across London, with Tower Hamlets (a highly deprived and ethnically diverse area) scoring the highest.

Objective

To identify examples of best practice and co-design recommendations for improving physical health checks and follow-up care amongst people with SMI in Tower Hamlets.

Methods

Data were collected through online questionnaires (using SMI physical health best practice checklists), one-on-one interviews (n = 7) and focus groups (n = 3) with general practices, secondary mental health services, commissioners and leads of community services and public health programmes, experts by experience and community, voluntary and social enterprise organisations in Tower Hamlets. Data were analysed using deductive and inductive thematic analysis.

Results

Twenty-two participants representing 15 general practices (out of 32), secondary mental health services, commissioners and public health leads completed the online questionnaires. Twenty-one participants took part in interviews and focus groups. Examples of best practice included cleaning and validating the SMI register regularly by general practices, knowing the number of patients who had been offered and/or received physical health checks, having clear pathways to community and specialist care services, using various communication methods and having a key performance indicator (KPI) for tailored smoking cessation services for people with SMI. Recommendations included adopting evidence-informed frameworks for risk stratification and utilising the wider primary care workforce with specific training to follow up on results, offer interventions and support navigating pathways and taking up follow-up care. Incentivising schemes were needed to deliver additional physical health check components such as oral health, cancer screening, Covid-19 vaccination and sexual health checks. Including KPIs in other community services' specifications with reference to SMI people was warranted. Further engagement with experts by experience and staff training were needed.

Conclusion

The present initiative identified best practice examples and co-designed recommendations for improving physical health checks and follow-up care in deprived and ethnically diverse people with SMI.

Patient or Public Contribution

This initiative was supported by three experts with experience, and two community organisations, who were involved in data curation and interpretation, development of recommendations and/or dissemination activities including writing this manuscript.

Abstract Image

贫困和种族多元化的严重精神疾病患者的身体健康检查和后续护理:共同设计的改善护理建议》。
背景:在整个伦敦,患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的成年人的过早死亡率差异很大,而塔哈姆雷特(一个高度贫困和种族多样化的地区)的死亡率最高:目标:找出最佳实践范例,并共同设计建议,以改善哈姆雷特塔地区严重精神疾病患者的身体健康检查和后续护理:方法:通过在线问卷调查(使用SMI身体健康最佳实践清单)、一对一访谈(n = 7)和焦点小组(n = 3)收集数据,访谈对象包括全科医生、二级精神卫生服务机构、社区服务和公共卫生项目的专员和负责人、经验专家以及塔哈姆雷特的社区、志愿和社会企业组织。采用演绎和归纳主题分析法对数据进行分析:代表 15 家全科诊所(共 32 家)、二级精神卫生服务机构、专员和公共卫生负责人的 22 名参与者填写了在线问卷。21 名参与者参加了访谈和焦点小组。最佳实践的例子包括由全科医疗机构定期清理和验证 SMI 登记册、了解已提供和/或接受身体健康检查的患者人数、拥有通往社区和专科护理服务的清晰路径、使用各种沟通方法以及为 SMI 患者量身定制戒烟服务的关键绩效指标 (KPI)。建议包括采用循证框架进行风险分层,利用受过专门培训的更广泛的初级医疗队伍来跟进检查结果、提供干预措施、支持路径导航以及接受后续治疗。需要制定激励计划,以提供额外的身体健康检查内容,如口腔健康、癌症筛查、Covid-19 疫苗接种和性健康检查。将关键绩效指标纳入其他社区服务规范中,并参考 SMI 患者的情况是有必要的。此外,还需要进一步邀请经验丰富的专家参与,并对员工进行培训:本倡议确定了最佳实践范例和共同设计的建议,以改善贫困和种族多元化的 SMI 患者的身体健康检查和后续护理:本倡议得到了三位经验丰富的专家和两个社区组织的支持,他们参与了数据整理和解释、建议制定和/或传播活动,包括撰写本手稿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信