Joseph F Seay, Clifford L Hancock, Isabella O'Keefe, John W Ramsay, Brian S Baum, Harvey Edwards, John Kuzmeski, Meghan P O'Donovan
{"title":"Metabolic adaptation and related biomechanics in an ankle-based exoskeleton system during six sessions of steady state walking.","authors":"Joseph F Seay, Clifford L Hancock, Isabella O'Keefe, John W Ramsay, Brian S Baum, Harvey Edwards, John Kuzmeski, Meghan P O'Donovan","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2024.2394511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ankle-based exoskeletons have demonstrated metabolic benefits during steady-state walking; however, variability exists in individual adaptation timelines necessary to achieve those benefits. This study assessed timelines for metabolic and gait-related adaptation while wearing an ankle-based exoskeleton while powered (EXOP) compared to unpowered (EXNP) and no device worn (NOEX). Metabolic (VO<sub>2</sub>) and biomechanics data were collected while 14 participants walked on a treadmill at 1.3 m/s for six sessions. To better understand variability in responses to wearing exoskeletons, the cohort was divided based on the slope of the VO<sub>2</sub> response of the first two sessions in the EXOP condition, and gait parameters were compared between subgroups. Repeated measures analyses of variance revealed a significant (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001) 10% VO<sub>2</sub> reduction for EXOP compared to EXNP and a non-significant 2.5% reduction for EXOP v NOEX. Lack of significant session-based comparisons indicated no additional VO<sub>2</sub> adaptation; however, significant session-related results for peak knee flexion (interaction, <i>p</i> = 0.042) and step width (session main effect, <i>p</i> = 0.003) suggest gait-related adaptation continued during the sessions. Subgroup results indicated different response profiles to wearing exoskeletons; and implications of classifying initial responses based on metabolic response are discussed as an approach to understand what drives variation in responses to these devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2394511","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ankle-based exoskeletons have demonstrated metabolic benefits during steady-state walking; however, variability exists in individual adaptation timelines necessary to achieve those benefits. This study assessed timelines for metabolic and gait-related adaptation while wearing an ankle-based exoskeleton while powered (EXOP) compared to unpowered (EXNP) and no device worn (NOEX). Metabolic (VO2) and biomechanics data were collected while 14 participants walked on a treadmill at 1.3 m/s for six sessions. To better understand variability in responses to wearing exoskeletons, the cohort was divided based on the slope of the VO2 response of the first two sessions in the EXOP condition, and gait parameters were compared between subgroups. Repeated measures analyses of variance revealed a significant (p ≤ 0.001) 10% VO2 reduction for EXOP compared to EXNP and a non-significant 2.5% reduction for EXOP v NOEX. Lack of significant session-based comparisons indicated no additional VO2 adaptation; however, significant session-related results for peak knee flexion (interaction, p = 0.042) and step width (session main effect, p = 0.003) suggest gait-related adaptation continued during the sessions. Subgroup results indicated different response profiles to wearing exoskeletons; and implications of classifying initial responses based on metabolic response are discussed as an approach to understand what drives variation in responses to these devices.
期刊介绍:
Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives.
The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people.
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.