Exploring the Experience of Student Researchers and Family Partners Working as an Interdisciplinary Team.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2024-08-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608241274222
Karsten Berg, Mariana Dos Santos Ribeiro, Hadiya Huijer, Sandi Whitford, Schroder Sattar, Roslyn M Compton
{"title":"Exploring the Experience of Student Researchers and Family Partners Working as an Interdisciplinary Team.","authors":"Karsten Berg, Mariana Dos Santos Ribeiro, Hadiya Huijer, Sandi Whitford, Schroder Sattar, Roslyn M Compton","doi":"10.1177/23779608241274222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many institutions seek to engage postsecondary students in research to grow future researchers. Despite this common goal, the means to achieve that end is often unknown creating difficulties for students as they seek out research opportunities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article will share first-hand reports on the experiences of graduate students, undergraduate students, and family partners following their engagement as an interdisciplinary research team.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a qualitative study using individual open-ended interviews with undergraduate students, graduate students, and patient family partners. The research was conducted using a Patient-Oriented Research approach. The transcripts were analyzed inductively by using Braun and Clarke's six phases of reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two themes were developed from the analysis. The theme of <i>Benefits & Facilitators</i> was developed based on the many positive thoughts, feelings, resiliency, and learning expressed by the students and family partners. The undergraduate students found the experience of \"doing\" research fulfilling and a great tool for learning how to better use research in practice. Within the second theme <i>Perceived Hierarchy</i>, undergraduate students described themselves as helpers, not responsible, and they did not have the power to make decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the challenges identified in this study, future efforts in this approach should carefully consider the culture and how to best engage graduate students, undergraduate students, and family partners in research teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241274222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Many institutions seek to engage postsecondary students in research to grow future researchers. Despite this common goal, the means to achieve that end is often unknown creating difficulties for students as they seek out research opportunities.

Objective: This article will share first-hand reports on the experiences of graduate students, undergraduate students, and family partners following their engagement as an interdisciplinary research team.

Methods: This is a qualitative study using individual open-ended interviews with undergraduate students, graduate students, and patient family partners. The research was conducted using a Patient-Oriented Research approach. The transcripts were analyzed inductively by using Braun and Clarke's six phases of reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Two themes were developed from the analysis. The theme of Benefits & Facilitators was developed based on the many positive thoughts, feelings, resiliency, and learning expressed by the students and family partners. The undergraduate students found the experience of "doing" research fulfilling and a great tool for learning how to better use research in practice. Within the second theme Perceived Hierarchy, undergraduate students described themselves as helpers, not responsible, and they did not have the power to make decisions.

Conclusion: Given the challenges identified in this study, future efforts in this approach should carefully consider the culture and how to best engage graduate students, undergraduate students, and family partners in research teams.

探索学生研究人员和家庭合作伙伴作为跨学科团队的工作经验。
导言:许多院校都希望让中学后学生参与研究,以培养未来的研究人员。尽管这是一个共同的目标,但实现这一目标的途径往往不为人知,这给学生寻找研究机会造成了困难:本文将分享研究生、本科生和家庭伙伴参与跨学科研究团队后的第一手经验报告:这是一项定性研究,通过对本科生、研究生和患者家庭伙伴进行个人开放式访谈。研究采用以患者为导向的研究方法。采用布劳恩和克拉克的六阶段反思性主题分析法对访谈记录进行归纳分析:分析得出了两个主题。益处和促进因素 "这一主题是根据学生和家庭伙伴所表达的许多积极的想法、感受、复原力和学习而提出的。本科生认为 "做 "研究的经历很充实,是学习如何在实践中更好地利用研究的好工具。在第二个主题 "感知等级 "中,本科生将自己描述为帮助者,而不是负责任的人,他们没有做决定的权力:鉴于本研究中发现的挑战,今后在采用这种方法时应仔细考虑文化,以及如何以最佳方式让研究生、本科生和家庭伙伴参与到研究团队中来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信