[Health Economic Evaluation of Surgical Treatment for Cancer].

Q4 Medicine
Minoru Esaki, Ataru Igarashi, Shunsuke Tsukamoto, Shunsuke Sugawara, Masau Sekiguchi, Atsuro Fujinaga
{"title":"[Health Economic Evaluation of Surgical Treatment for Cancer].","authors":"Minoru Esaki, Ataru Igarashi, Shunsuke Tsukamoto, Shunsuke Sugawara, Masau Sekiguchi, Atsuro Fujinaga","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conducting\"health economic evaluation\"is one of the most important issues for the efficient allocation of healthcare costs. Although the Central Social Insurance Medical Council in Japan(Chuikyo)introduced a cost-effectiveness evaluation system for drugs and medical devices in 2019, there are no reports of the system being officially utilized for medical procedures, including surgical treatments. Because it is often required to provide the best possible treatment to save lives, cancer care is an area where it is difficult to adapt\"health economic evaluation\". In addition, surgical treatment is more invasive than medical checkups or drug therapy, and complications and hospitalization costs vary widely from case to case, so the cooperation of the medical affairs department is essential in examining medical costs for health economic evaluation. Although QOL surveys are important for the evaluation of invasiveness, there are almost no large-scale studies that reflect the actual conditions of treatment, and none for Japanese and for patients undergoing cancer treatment. It is essential to conduct QOL surveys for future health economic evaluation. We will explain\"health economic evaluation\"of surgical treatment for cancer, using as examples the results of medical technology evaluation of surgical techniques that we have reviewed. In considering the\"health economic evaluation\"of surgical treatment for cancer, the medical cost and QOL surveys were considered to be particularly important. We look forward to future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":35588,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conducting"health economic evaluation"is one of the most important issues for the efficient allocation of healthcare costs. Although the Central Social Insurance Medical Council in Japan(Chuikyo)introduced a cost-effectiveness evaluation system for drugs and medical devices in 2019, there are no reports of the system being officially utilized for medical procedures, including surgical treatments. Because it is often required to provide the best possible treatment to save lives, cancer care is an area where it is difficult to adapt"health economic evaluation". In addition, surgical treatment is more invasive than medical checkups or drug therapy, and complications and hospitalization costs vary widely from case to case, so the cooperation of the medical affairs department is essential in examining medical costs for health economic evaluation. Although QOL surveys are important for the evaluation of invasiveness, there are almost no large-scale studies that reflect the actual conditions of treatment, and none for Japanese and for patients undergoing cancer treatment. It is essential to conduct QOL surveys for future health economic evaluation. We will explain"health economic evaluation"of surgical treatment for cancer, using as examples the results of medical technology evaluation of surgical techniques that we have reviewed. In considering the"health economic evaluation"of surgical treatment for cancer, the medical cost and QOL surveys were considered to be particularly important. We look forward to future research.

[癌症外科治疗的卫生经济评估]。
进行 "卫生经济评估 "是有效分配医疗成本的最重要问题之一。虽然日本中央社会保险医疗协议会(Chuikyo)在 2019 年引入了针对药品和医疗器械的成本效益评估系统,但目前还没有关于该系统正式用于包括手术治疗在内的医疗程序的报道。由于通常需要提供最佳治疗以挽救生命,癌症治疗是难以适应 "卫生经济评估 "的领域。此外,手术治疗比体检或药物治疗更具侵入性,并发症和住院费用也因病例而异,因此,在进行卫生经济评价的医疗费用检查时,医疗事务部门的合作至关重要。虽然 QOL 调查对于评估侵入性非常重要,但几乎没有反映实际治疗情况的大规模研究,也没有针对日本人和接受癌症治疗的患者的大规模研究。在今后的健康经济评估中,进行 QOL 调查至关重要。我们将以已审查过的外科技术医疗技术评估结果为例,对癌症外科治疗的 "健康经济评价 "进行说明。在考虑癌症外科治疗的 "卫生经济评估 "时,医疗成本和 QOL 调查被认为尤为重要。我们期待着未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
337
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信