Exploring Gaps in Child Maltreatment Trends: A Narrative Review from the U.S. and Japan.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Yonago acta medica Pub Date : 2024-08-27 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.33160/yam.2024.08.014
Tamaki Hosoda-Urban
{"title":"Exploring Gaps in Child Maltreatment Trends: A Narrative Review from the U.S. and Japan.","authors":"Tamaki Hosoda-Urban","doi":"10.33160/yam.2024.08.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Child maltreatment affects millions globally across all economic levels. Despite its prevalence, comparative research and internationally comparable data are limited due to varied definitions, methodologies, and reporting systems. This narrative review aims to compare child maltreatment trends in the U.S. and Japan, highlighting the roles of sociocultural factors. Through a literature review and analysis of national data since 1990, the study estimates maltreatment and fatality rates in both countries. Findings suggest an increase in Japan's reported maltreatment cases, likely attributable to legislative changes and heightened public awareness, while the U.S. appears to show a decline, potentially linked to improved mental health services and socioeconomic advancements. In both nations, mothers are predominantly identified as perpetrators, with sociocultural factors influencing maltreatment types and rates. Japan faces challenges in accurately measuring maltreatment due to reporting inconsistencies and mental health stigma. Despite a higher victimization rate, Japan reports significantly fewer fatalities than the U.S., with the fatality rate in the U.S. being approximately 9 times higher than in Japan. This contrast underscores the critical role of healthcare access and mental health support. The review advocates for international efforts to standardize maltreatment definitions and reporting, suggesting the adoption of trauma-informed care and comprehensive healthcare access as effective strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23795,"journal":{"name":"Yonago acta medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11335919/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonago acta medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33160/yam.2024.08.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Child maltreatment affects millions globally across all economic levels. Despite its prevalence, comparative research and internationally comparable data are limited due to varied definitions, methodologies, and reporting systems. This narrative review aims to compare child maltreatment trends in the U.S. and Japan, highlighting the roles of sociocultural factors. Through a literature review and analysis of national data since 1990, the study estimates maltreatment and fatality rates in both countries. Findings suggest an increase in Japan's reported maltreatment cases, likely attributable to legislative changes and heightened public awareness, while the U.S. appears to show a decline, potentially linked to improved mental health services and socioeconomic advancements. In both nations, mothers are predominantly identified as perpetrators, with sociocultural factors influencing maltreatment types and rates. Japan faces challenges in accurately measuring maltreatment due to reporting inconsistencies and mental health stigma. Despite a higher victimization rate, Japan reports significantly fewer fatalities than the U.S., with the fatality rate in the U.S. being approximately 9 times higher than in Japan. This contrast underscores the critical role of healthcare access and mental health support. The review advocates for international efforts to standardize maltreatment definitions and reporting, suggesting the adoption of trauma-informed care and comprehensive healthcare access as effective strategies.

探索儿童虐待趋势中的差距:美国和日本的叙述性回顾。
虐待儿童问题影响着全球数百万不同经济水平的儿童。尽管虐待儿童现象普遍存在,但由于定义、方法和报告制度的不同,比较研究和国际可比数据十分有限。本叙述性综述旨在比较美国和日本的儿童虐待趋势,强调社会文化因素的作用。通过文献回顾和对 1990 年以来全国数据的分析,本研究估算了两国的虐待率和死亡率。研究结果表明,日本报告的虐待案件有所增加,这可能归因于立法改革和公众意识的提高,而美国似乎有所下降,这可能与心理健康服务的改善和社会经济的进步有关。在这两个国家,施虐者主要是母亲,社会文化因素影响着虐待的类型和发生率。由于报告不一致和心理健康污名化,日本在准确衡量虐待方面面临挑战。尽管受害率较高,但日本报告的死亡人数却明显少于美国,美国的死亡率约为日本的 9 倍。这种反差凸显了医疗保健和心理健康支持的关键作用。研究报告提倡国际社会努力实现虐待定义和报告的标准化,并建议采用创伤知情护理和综合医疗保健服务作为有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yonago acta medica
Yonago acta medica MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Yonago Acta Medica (YAM) is an electronic journal specializing in medical sciences, published by Tottori University Medical Press, 86 Nishi-cho, Yonago 683-8503, Japan. The subject areas cover the following: molecular/cell biology; biochemistry; basic medicine; clinical medicine; veterinary medicine; clinical nutrition and food sciences; medical engineering; nursing sciences; laboratory medicine; clinical psychology; medical education. Basically, contributors are limited to members of Tottori University and Tottori University Hospital. Researchers outside the above-mentioned university community may also submit papers on the recommendation of a professor, an associate professor, or a junior associate professor at this university community. Articles are classified into four categories: review articles, original articles, patient reports, and short communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信