Gut microbiota alterations in renal transplant recipients and the risk of urinary tract infection and delayed graft function: A preliminary prospective study.

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urologia Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1177/03915603241276742
Erfan Jelveh Moghaddam, Gholamreza Pourmand, Sara Ahmadi Badi, Hossein Yarmohammadi, Masood Soltanipur, Mehrdad Mahalleh, Mahdi Rezaei, Seyed Mohsen Mirhosseini, Seyed Davar Siadat
{"title":"Gut microbiota alterations in renal transplant recipients and the risk of urinary tract infection and delayed graft function: A preliminary prospective study.","authors":"Erfan Jelveh Moghaddam, Gholamreza Pourmand, Sara Ahmadi Badi, Hossein Yarmohammadi, Masood Soltanipur, Mehrdad Mahalleh, Mahdi Rezaei, Seyed Mohsen Mirhosseini, Seyed Davar Siadat","doi":"10.1177/03915603241276742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The implication of gut microbiota in the gut-kidney axis affects the pathophysiology of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Gut microbiota composition changes during CKD. We aimed to determine the relative frequency of important gut microbiota members in end-stage renal disease (ERSD) patients before and after renal transplantation compared to healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen kidney transplant patients and 10 healthy subjects were recruited in this case-control prospective study. Fecal samples were taken sequentially from all patients before kidney transplantation, 1 week, and 1 month after it. The relative frequency of <i>Lactobacillus</i> spp., <i>Bifidobacterium</i> spp., <i>Akkermansia muciniphila, Bacteroides fragilis, Escherichia coli</i>, and <i>Faecalibacterium pruasnitzii</i> were determined through quantitative PCR. The obtained data was statistically analyzed by Stata software (Stata Corporation, USA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean log number of all bacteria was significantly higher in healthy individuals than kidney transplant recipients (<i>p</i> < 0.001) except for Lactobacillus where the mean levels were almost identical in the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.67). Moreover, 20% (3) of patients developed a urinary tract infection. Besides, 2 (13.33%) patients were diagnosed with delayed graft function. There were no statistically significant differences regarding changing trends in bacteria log number of <i>Akkermansia muciniphila</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.12), <i>Bacteroid fragilis</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.75), <i>Bifidobacterium</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.99), <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.5), <i>Faecalibacterium</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.98), and <i>Lactobacilli</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.93) between patients with and without delayed graft function (DGF).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gut microbiota composition in patients with ESRD was significantly different from those without it. However, the microbiota profile did not significantly differ in patients with and without DGF.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"781-787"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241276742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The implication of gut microbiota in the gut-kidney axis affects the pathophysiology of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Gut microbiota composition changes during CKD. We aimed to determine the relative frequency of important gut microbiota members in end-stage renal disease (ERSD) patients before and after renal transplantation compared to healthy subjects.

Methods: Fifteen kidney transplant patients and 10 healthy subjects were recruited in this case-control prospective study. Fecal samples were taken sequentially from all patients before kidney transplantation, 1 week, and 1 month after it. The relative frequency of Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Akkermansia muciniphila, Bacteroides fragilis, Escherichia coli, and Faecalibacterium pruasnitzii were determined through quantitative PCR. The obtained data was statistically analyzed by Stata software (Stata Corporation, USA).

Results: The mean log number of all bacteria was significantly higher in healthy individuals than kidney transplant recipients (p < 0.001) except for Lactobacillus where the mean levels were almost identical in the two groups (p = 0.67). Moreover, 20% (3) of patients developed a urinary tract infection. Besides, 2 (13.33%) patients were diagnosed with delayed graft function. There were no statistically significant differences regarding changing trends in bacteria log number of Akkermansia muciniphila (p = 0.12), Bacteroid fragilis (p = 0.75), Bifidobacterium (p = 0.99), Escherichia coli (p = 0.5), Faecalibacterium (p = 0.98), and Lactobacilli (p = 0.93) between patients with and without delayed graft function (DGF).

Conclusion: Gut microbiota composition in patients with ESRD was significantly different from those without it. However, the microbiota profile did not significantly differ in patients with and without DGF.

肾移植受者肠道微生物群的改变与尿路感染和移植功能延迟的风险:一项初步的前瞻性研究。
背景:肠道微生物群在肠道-肾脏轴中的作用影响着慢性肾脏病(CKD)的病理生理学。肠道微生物群的组成在 CKD 期间会发生变化。我们的目的是确定终末期肾病(ERSD)患者在肾移植前后与健康人相比重要肠道微生物群成员的相对频率:这项病例对照前瞻性研究招募了 15 名肾移植患者和 10 名健康受试者。在肾移植前、肾移植后 1 周和 1 个月,依次采集所有患者的粪便样本。通过定量聚合酶链式反应(PCR)测定了乳酸杆菌属、双歧杆菌属、Akkermansia muciniphila、脆弱拟杆菌、大肠杆菌和普鲁氏粪杆菌的相对频率。所得数据用 Stata 软件(Stata Corporation,美国)进行统计分析:结果:健康人所有细菌的平均对数值明显高于肾移植受者(P = 0.67)。此外,20% 的患者(3 人)发生了尿路感染。此外,2 名(13.33%)患者被诊断为移植功能延迟。有移植物功能延迟(DGF)和无移植物功能延迟(DGF)的患者之间,Akkermansia muciniphila(p = 0.12)、Bacteroid fragilis(p = 0.75)、双歧杆菌(p = 0.99)、大肠杆菌(p = 0.5)、粪杆菌(p = 0.98)和乳酸杆菌(p = 0.93)的细菌对数变化趋势无统计学差异:结论:ESRD患者的肠道微生物群组成与无ESRD患者有显著差异。结论:ESRD 患者的肠道微生物群组成与无 ESRD 患者的肠道微生物群组成有明显差异,但有 DGF 和无 DGF 患者的微生物群组成无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信