The impact of tobacco tax increases on cost-minimising behaviours and subsequent smoking cessation in Australia: an analysis of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ara Cho, Michelle Scollo, Gary Chan, Pete Driezen, Andrew Hyland, Ce Shang, Coral E Gartner
{"title":"The impact of tobacco tax increases on cost-minimising behaviours and subsequent smoking cessation in Australia: an analysis of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project.","authors":"Ara Cho, Michelle Scollo, Gary Chan, Pete Driezen, Andrew Hyland, Ce Shang, Coral E Gartner","doi":"10.1136/tc-2024-058776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined the relationship in Australia from 2007 to 2020 between tobacco tax increases and use of cost-minimising behaviours (CMBs) when purchasing tobacco and: (1) tobacco expenditure and (2) smoking cessation attempts and quit success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data collected from adults who smoked factory-made and/or roll-your-own (RYO) cigarettes in nine waves (2007-2020) of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Australia Survey (N<sub>sample</sub>=4975, N<sub>observations</sub>=10 474). CMBs included buying RYO tobacco, cartons, large-sized packs, economy packs, or tax avoidance/evasion, smoking reduction and e-cigarette use. Logistic regression, fit using generalised estimating equations, estimated the CMB-outcome association for quit attempts and quit success at the next wave follow-up (N<sub>subsample</sub>=2984, N<sub>observations</sub>=6843).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over half of respondents used a CMB for tobacco purchase (P-CMB) at baseline (57.1% in 2007-2008), increasing to 76.8% (2018) post-tax increases. Participating in any P-CMB was associated with having higher weekly tobacco expenditure. Engaging in any P-CMB was negatively associated with attempting to quit (aOR=0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.98). Purchasing RYO tobacco or cartons was associated with making no quit attempts (aOR=0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.83; aOR=0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.89, respectively). Among respondents smoking cigarettes who made quit attempts, there were no significant associations between all P-CMBs and quit success. Neither smoking reduction nor vaping were significantly associated with quit attempts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>P<b>-</b>CMBs are associated with reduced smoking cessation. Reducing opportunities for industry to promote purchasing-related CMB options, such as by standardising pack sizes and reducing the price differential between RYO and manufactured cigarettes could increase the effectiveness of tax increases.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-058776","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We examined the relationship in Australia from 2007 to 2020 between tobacco tax increases and use of cost-minimising behaviours (CMBs) when purchasing tobacco and: (1) tobacco expenditure and (2) smoking cessation attempts and quit success.

Methods: We used data collected from adults who smoked factory-made and/or roll-your-own (RYO) cigarettes in nine waves (2007-2020) of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Australia Survey (Nsample=4975, Nobservations=10 474). CMBs included buying RYO tobacco, cartons, large-sized packs, economy packs, or tax avoidance/evasion, smoking reduction and e-cigarette use. Logistic regression, fit using generalised estimating equations, estimated the CMB-outcome association for quit attempts and quit success at the next wave follow-up (Nsubsample=2984, Nobservations=6843).

Results: Over half of respondents used a CMB for tobacco purchase (P-CMB) at baseline (57.1% in 2007-2008), increasing to 76.8% (2018) post-tax increases. Participating in any P-CMB was associated with having higher weekly tobacco expenditure. Engaging in any P-CMB was negatively associated with attempting to quit (aOR=0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.98). Purchasing RYO tobacco or cartons was associated with making no quit attempts (aOR=0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.83; aOR=0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.89, respectively). Among respondents smoking cigarettes who made quit attempts, there were no significant associations between all P-CMBs and quit success. Neither smoking reduction nor vaping were significantly associated with quit attempts.

Conclusion: P-CMBs are associated with reduced smoking cessation. Reducing opportunities for industry to promote purchasing-related CMB options, such as by standardising pack sizes and reducing the price differential between RYO and manufactured cigarettes could increase the effectiveness of tax increases.

澳大利亚提高烟草税对成本最小化行为和随后戒烟的影响:国际烟草控制政策评估项目分析。
目的:我们研究了澳大利亚从 2007 年到 2020 年期间烟草税的增加和购买烟草时使用成本最小化行为(CMB)与(1)烟草支出和(2)戒烟尝试和戒烟成功之间的关系:(1) 烟草支出和 (2) 戒烟尝试和戒烟成功率:我们使用了国际烟草控制政策评估项目澳大利亚调查(样本数=4975,观察数=10 474)九次波次(2007-2020)中收集的吸工厂制造和/或卷烟(RYO)的成年人的数据。CMB包括购买RYO烟草、纸盒、大包装、经济装,或避税/逃税、减少吸烟和使用电子烟。利用广义估计方程拟合的逻辑回归估算了CMB与戒烟尝试和下一轮随访时的戒烟成功率之间的关系(Nsubsample=2984,Nobservations=6843):超过一半的受访者在基线(2007-2008 年为 57.1%)时使用中巴购买烟草(P-中巴),税率提高后增加到 76.8%(2018 年)。参与任何私营中巴都与每周烟草支出较高有关。参与任何私营中巴与尝试戒烟呈负相关(aOR=0.82,95% CI 0.69-0.98)。购买 RYO 烟草或烟盒与未尝试戒烟有关(aOR=0.66,95% CI 0.52-0.83;aOR=0.72,95% CI 0.59-0.89)。在尝试戒烟的吸烟受访者中,所有 P-CMB 与戒烟成功率之间均无显著关联。减少吸烟量和吸食电子烟均与戒烟尝试无明显关系:结论:颗粒状中巴与戒烟率降低有关。减少烟草行业推广与购买相关的中巴选项的机会,例如通过标准化包装尺寸和减少零售卷烟与制造卷烟之间的价格差异,可以提高增税的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信