Reprint of: Examining U.S. disparities in smoking among rural versus urban women of reproductive age: 2002–2019

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Stephen T. Higgins , Tyler Erath , Fang-Fang Chen
{"title":"Reprint of: Examining U.S. disparities in smoking among rural versus urban women of reproductive age: 2002–2019","authors":"Stephen T. Higgins ,&nbsp;Tyler Erath ,&nbsp;Fang-Fang Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study is part of a programmatic investigation of rural disparities in cigarette smoking examining disparities in smoking prevalence and for the first-time quit ratios among adult women of reproductive age (18–44 years), a highly vulnerable population due to risk for multigenerational adverse effects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data came from 18 years (2002–2019) of the U.S. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) among women (<em>n</em> = 280,626) categorized by rural-urban residence, pregnancy status, using weighted logistic regression models testing time trends and controlling for well-established sociodemographic predictors of smoking (race/ethnicity, education, income). Concerns regarding changes in survey methods used before 2002 and after 2019 precluded inclusion of earlier and more recent survey years in the present study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall smoking prevalence across years was greater in rural than urban residents (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.11; 95%CI, 1.07–1.15; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) including those not-pregnant (AOR = 1.10; 1.07–1.14; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and pregnant (AOR = 1.29; 1.09–1.52; P &lt; .001). Overall quit ratios across years were lower in rural than urban residents (AOR = 0.93; 0.87–0.99; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) including those not-pregnant (AOR = 0.93; 0.88–1.00, <em>P</em> = .035) and pregnant (AOR = 0.78; 0.62–0.99; <em>P</em> = .039). Interactions of rural versus urban residence with study years for prevalence and quit ratios overall and by pregnancy status are detailed in the main text.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These results support a longstanding and robust rural disparity in smoking prevalence among women of reproductive age including those currently pregnant and provides novel evidence that differences in smoking cessation contribute to this disparity further underscoring a need for greater access to evidence-based tobacco control and regulatory interventions in rural regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 108115"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524002706","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study is part of a programmatic investigation of rural disparities in cigarette smoking examining disparities in smoking prevalence and for the first-time quit ratios among adult women of reproductive age (18–44 years), a highly vulnerable population due to risk for multigenerational adverse effects.

Methods

Data came from 18 years (2002–2019) of the U.S. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) among women (n = 280,626) categorized by rural-urban residence, pregnancy status, using weighted logistic regression models testing time trends and controlling for well-established sociodemographic predictors of smoking (race/ethnicity, education, income). Concerns regarding changes in survey methods used before 2002 and after 2019 precluded inclusion of earlier and more recent survey years in the present study.

Results

Overall smoking prevalence across years was greater in rural than urban residents (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.11; 95%CI, 1.07–1.15; P < .001) including those not-pregnant (AOR = 1.10; 1.07–1.14; P < .001) and pregnant (AOR = 1.29; 1.09–1.52; P < .001). Overall quit ratios across years were lower in rural than urban residents (AOR = 0.93; 0.87–0.99; P < .001) including those not-pregnant (AOR = 0.93; 0.88–1.00, P = .035) and pregnant (AOR = 0.78; 0.62–0.99; P = .039). Interactions of rural versus urban residence with study years for prevalence and quit ratios overall and by pregnancy status are detailed in the main text.

Conclusions

These results support a longstanding and robust rural disparity in smoking prevalence among women of reproductive age including those currently pregnant and provides novel evidence that differences in smoking cessation contribute to this disparity further underscoring a need for greater access to evidence-based tobacco control and regulatory interventions in rural regions.
重印本:研究美国农村与城市育龄妇女吸烟的差异:2002-2019 年。
研究目的本研究是对农村地区吸烟差异进行的一项计划性调查的一部分,调查对象为育龄成年女性(18-44 岁)中吸烟率和首次戒烟率的差异:数据来自美国全国药物使用和健康调查(NSDUH)18 年(2002-2019 年)的数据,按城乡居住地和怀孕状况对妇女(n = 280,626 人)进行分类,使用加权逻辑回归模型检验时间趋势,并控制已确立的吸烟社会人口预测因素(种族/民族、教育、收入)。考虑到 2002 年之前和 2019 年之后调查方法的变化,本研究未将较早和较近的调查年份纳入其中:结果:农村居民在不同年份的总体吸烟率高于城市居民(调整后的几率比 [AOR] = 1.11;95%CI,1.07-1.15;P 结论:这些结果支持了农村居民吸烟率的长期稳健增长:这些结果表明,农村育龄妇女(包括怀孕妇女)的吸烟率长期存在巨大差异,并提供了新的证据表明,戒烟方面的差异导致了这种差异,这进一步强调了农村地区需要更多的循证烟草控制和监管干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Preventive medicine
Preventive medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信