Integral Dose or Mean Dose for Predicting Radiosurgery Response in Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Proposal to Target the Narrowest Part of the Nerve.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000003145
Ying Meng, Brandon Santhumayor, Elad Mashiach, Kenneth Bernstein, Jason Gurewitz, Benjamin T Cooper, Erik Sulman, Joshua Silverman, Douglas Kondziolka
{"title":"Integral Dose or Mean Dose for Predicting Radiosurgery Response in Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Proposal to Target the Narrowest Part of the Nerve.","authors":"Ying Meng, Brandon Santhumayor, Elad Mashiach, Kenneth Bernstein, Jason Gurewitz, Benjamin T Cooper, Erik Sulman, Joshua Silverman, Douglas Kondziolka","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is effective for patients with medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia with a 75%-90% response rate. Consideration of the integral dose (ID) to the target nerve within the 50% isodose line was reported to help select prescription doses to maximize effectiveness and minimize bothersome numbness. The objective of this study was to externally validate the ID as a predictor of outcomes after SRS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the outcomes and parameters of 94 consecutive patients of type 1 trigeminal neuralgia who had SRS for the first time where nerve ID was calculated. 70% of the prescription doses were 80 Gy, with 28% at 85 Gy, and 2% at 70 Gy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up time was 14.4 months. A total of 85 (90%) patients reported significant pain relief (Barrow Neurological Institute I-III) after initial SRS. The median pain recurrence-free survival was 82 months (95% CI 41.1-NA), and estimates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 80.5%, 65.5%, and 55.9%, respectively. The ID was not significantly associated with initial pain relief, or affect the risk of pain recurrence or sensory dysfunction after SRS using the Cox proportional hazards model. A nerve mean dose ≥65 Gy was associated with a reduced risk of pain recurrence on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.408, P = .039). Twenty (21%) patients experienced sensory dysfunction after SRS with 3 (3%) requiring further medications, which was not correlated with the prescription dose or brainstem maximum dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ID did not predict recurrence-free survival or sensory dysfunction. Our observations suggest improved nerve coverage by the most powerful area of the isocenter, for instance, by targeting a narrower segment if feasible, could result in more durable pain relief. Further studies to validate these findings are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"622-629"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is effective for patients with medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia with a 75%-90% response rate. Consideration of the integral dose (ID) to the target nerve within the 50% isodose line was reported to help select prescription doses to maximize effectiveness and minimize bothersome numbness. The objective of this study was to externally validate the ID as a predictor of outcomes after SRS.

Methods: We reviewed the outcomes and parameters of 94 consecutive patients of type 1 trigeminal neuralgia who had SRS for the first time where nerve ID was calculated. 70% of the prescription doses were 80 Gy, with 28% at 85 Gy, and 2% at 70 Gy.

Results: The median follow-up time was 14.4 months. A total of 85 (90%) patients reported significant pain relief (Barrow Neurological Institute I-III) after initial SRS. The median pain recurrence-free survival was 82 months (95% CI 41.1-NA), and estimates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 80.5%, 65.5%, and 55.9%, respectively. The ID was not significantly associated with initial pain relief, or affect the risk of pain recurrence or sensory dysfunction after SRS using the Cox proportional hazards model. A nerve mean dose ≥65 Gy was associated with a reduced risk of pain recurrence on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.408, P = .039). Twenty (21%) patients experienced sensory dysfunction after SRS with 3 (3%) requiring further medications, which was not correlated with the prescription dose or brainstem maximum dose.

Conclusion: The ID did not predict recurrence-free survival or sensory dysfunction. Our observations suggest improved nerve coverage by the most powerful area of the isocenter, for instance, by targeting a narrower segment if feasible, could result in more durable pain relief. Further studies to validate these findings are needed.

预测三叉神经痛患者放射手术反应的积分剂量或平均剂量:针对神经最狭窄部分的建议。
背景和目的:立体定向放射手术(SRS)对药物难治性三叉神经痛患者有效,反应率为 75%-90% 。据报道,考虑 50%等剂量线内靶神经的积分剂量(ID)有助于选择处方剂量,从而最大限度地提高疗效并减少麻木感。本研究旨在从外部验证积分剂量作为 SRS 后疗效预测指标的作用:我们回顾了连续 94 例首次接受 SRS 的 1 型三叉神经痛患者的疗效和参数,并计算了神经 ID。70%的处方剂量为80 Gy,28%为85 Gy,2%为70 Gy:中位随访时间为 14.4 个月。共有 85 名(90%)患者在首次 SRS 后报告疼痛明显缓解(巴罗神经研究所 I-III)。无疼痛复发生存期的中位数为 82 个月(95% CI 41.1-NA),1、3 和 5 年的估计值分别为 80.5%、65.5% 和 55.9%。使用Cox比例危险模型,ID与初始疼痛缓解无明显关系,也不影响SRS后疼痛复发或感觉功能障碍的风险。在多变量分析中,神经平均剂量≥65 Gy与疼痛复发风险降低有关(危险比为0.408,P = 0.039)。20例(21%)患者在SRS后出现感觉功能障碍,其中3例(3%)需要进一步用药,这与处方剂量或脑干最大剂量无关:ID不能预测无复发生存率或感觉功能障碍。我们的观察结果表明,通过改善等中心最强大区域的神经覆盖范围,例如,在可行的情况下瞄准更窄的区段,可以实现更持久的疼痛缓解。还需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信