The Godina Principle in the 21st Century: Free Flap Timing after Isolated Lower Extremity Trauma in a Retrospective National Cohort.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Theodore E Habarth-Morales, Harrison D Davis, Arturo J Rios-Diaz, Robyn B Broach, Joseph M Serletti, Saïd C Azoury, L Scott Levin, Stephen J Kovach, Irfan A Rhemtulla
{"title":"The Godina Principle in the 21st Century: Free Flap Timing after Isolated Lower Extremity Trauma in a Retrospective National Cohort.","authors":"Theodore E Habarth-Morales, Harrison D Davis, Arturo J Rios-Diaz, Robyn B Broach, Joseph M Serletti, Saïd C Azoury, L Scott Levin, Stephen J Kovach, Irfan A Rhemtulla","doi":"10.1055/a-2404-7634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The timing of free flap reconstruction after lower extremity trauma has been a controversial debate since Marko Godina's original 72-hour recommendation. Recent advances in microsurgery warrant an evaluation of the optimal time to reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> The Nationwide Readmission Database (2014-2019) was used to identify patients undergoing free flap reconstruction after lower extremity trauma. Risk-adjusted statistical methods were used to identify optimal time where risk of infectious and microsurgical complications increase and to quantify the risk associated with time delays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 1,030 patients undergoing reconstruction were identified. The mean time to flap coverage was 24.3 days. Thirty-three percent were performed within 72 hours, 24% from 72 hours to 10 days, 18% from 10 to 30 days, and 24% after 30 days. Flaps performed after 10 days were associated with increased risk of surgical site infection, osteomyelitis, and other wound complications, compared with those performed within 72 hours. There was no increased risk in the period of 72 hours to 10 days. Revision amputation and microsurgical complications were not increased after 10 days. The predicted optimal cutoff was 9.5 days for microsurgical complications and 14.5 days for infectious complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Advances in microsurgery may be responsible for extending the time in which definitive soft tissue coverage is required for wounds resulting from lower extremity trauma. Although it appears the original 72-hour time window can be safely extended, efforts should be made to refer patients to specialty limb salvage centers in a timely fashion.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2404-7634","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  The timing of free flap reconstruction after lower extremity trauma has been a controversial debate since Marko Godina's original 72-hour recommendation. Recent advances in microsurgery warrant an evaluation of the optimal time to reconstruction.

Methods:  The Nationwide Readmission Database (2014-2019) was used to identify patients undergoing free flap reconstruction after lower extremity trauma. Risk-adjusted statistical methods were used to identify optimal time where risk of infectious and microsurgical complications increase and to quantify the risk associated with time delays.

Results:  A total of 1,030 patients undergoing reconstruction were identified. The mean time to flap coverage was 24.3 days. Thirty-three percent were performed within 72 hours, 24% from 72 hours to 10 days, 18% from 10 to 30 days, and 24% after 30 days. Flaps performed after 10 days were associated with increased risk of surgical site infection, osteomyelitis, and other wound complications, compared with those performed within 72 hours. There was no increased risk in the period of 72 hours to 10 days. Revision amputation and microsurgical complications were not increased after 10 days. The predicted optimal cutoff was 9.5 days for microsurgical complications and 14.5 days for infectious complications.

Conclusion:  Advances in microsurgery may be responsible for extending the time in which definitive soft tissue coverage is required for wounds resulting from lower extremity trauma. Although it appears the original 72-hour time window can be safely extended, efforts should be made to refer patients to specialty limb salvage centers in a timely fashion.

21 世纪的戈迪纳原则:全国回顾性队列中孤立下肢创伤后游离皮瓣的时机选择。
背景:自 Marko Godina 最初提出 72 小时的建议以来,下肢创伤后游离皮瓣重建的时机一直是一个有争议的问题。显微外科的最新进展表明,有必要对最佳重建时间进行评估:方法:利用全国再入院数据库(2014-2019 年)识别下肢创伤后接受游离皮瓣重建的患者。采用风险调整统计方法确定感染和显微外科并发症风险增加的最佳时间,并量化与时间延误相关的风险:结果:130 名患者接受了重建手术。皮瓣覆盖的平均时间为 24.3 天。33%在72小时内完成,24%在72小时至10天内完成,18%在10天至30天内完成,24%在30天后完成。与 72 小时内进行的皮瓣覆盖相比,10 天后进行的皮瓣覆盖会增加手术部位感染、骨髓炎和其他伤口并发症的风险。而在72小时至10天期间,风险并没有增加。10 天后翻修截肢和显微外科并发症也没有增加。预计显微外科并发症的最佳分界线是9.5天,感染性并发症的最佳分界线是14.5天:结论:显微外科的进步可能是导致下肢创伤伤口需要明确软组织覆盖时间延长的原因。尽管最初的72小时时间窗口似乎可以安全延长,但仍应努力将患者及时转诊至专业的肢体救治中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信