Accessibility of Neurotization in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Reconstruction: Inequities and Implications for Preauthorization.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Rachel E Schafer, Joseph D Quick, Madeleine M Blazel, Priya Shukla, Shannon S Wu, Raffi Gurunian, Steven Bernard, Sarah N Bishop, Graham Schwarz, Risal Djohan
{"title":"Accessibility of Neurotization in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Reconstruction: Inequities and Implications for Preauthorization.","authors":"Rachel E Schafer, Joseph D Quick, Madeleine M Blazel, Priya Shukla, Shannon S Wu, Raffi Gurunian, Steven Bernard, Sarah N Bishop, Graham Schwarz, Risal Djohan","doi":"10.1055/a-2404-1924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Breast anesthesia and hypoesthesia occur commonly after mastectomy and negatively impact quality of life. Neurotization during deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) breast reconstruction offers enhanced sensory recovery. However, access to neurotization for DIEP reconstruction patients has not been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This retrospective study included patients who underwent DIEP breast reconstruction between January 2021 and July 2022 at a tertiary-care, academic institution. Demographics, outcomes, insurance type, and Area Deprivation Index (ADI) were compared using two-sample <i>t</i>-test or chi-square analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of the 124 patients who met criteria, 41% had neurotization of their DIEP flaps. There was no difference in history of tobacco use (29% vs 33%), diabetes (14% vs 9.6%), operative time (9.43 vs 9.73 h), length of hospital stay (3 d vs 3 d), hospital readmission (9.8% vs 6.8%), or reoperation (12% vs 12%) between patients with and without neurotization. However, access to neurotization differed significantly by patient health insurance type. Patients who received neurotization had a lower median ADI percentile of 40.0, indicating higher socioeconomic advantage compared with patients who did not receive neurotization at 59.0 (<i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Access to neurotization differed significantly by patient health insurance and by ADI percentile. Expanding insurance coverage to cover neurotization is needed to increase equitable access and enhance quality of life for patients who come from disadvantaged communities. Our institution's process for preauthorization is outlined to enhance likelihood of insurance approval for neurotization.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2404-1924","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Breast anesthesia and hypoesthesia occur commonly after mastectomy and negatively impact quality of life. Neurotization during deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) breast reconstruction offers enhanced sensory recovery. However, access to neurotization for DIEP reconstruction patients has not been evaluated.

Methods:  This retrospective study included patients who underwent DIEP breast reconstruction between January 2021 and July 2022 at a tertiary-care, academic institution. Demographics, outcomes, insurance type, and Area Deprivation Index (ADI) were compared using two-sample t-test or chi-square analysis.

Results:  Of the 124 patients who met criteria, 41% had neurotization of their DIEP flaps. There was no difference in history of tobacco use (29% vs 33%), diabetes (14% vs 9.6%), operative time (9.43 vs 9.73 h), length of hospital stay (3 d vs 3 d), hospital readmission (9.8% vs 6.8%), or reoperation (12% vs 12%) between patients with and without neurotization. However, access to neurotization differed significantly by patient health insurance type. Patients who received neurotization had a lower median ADI percentile of 40.0, indicating higher socioeconomic advantage compared with patients who did not receive neurotization at 59.0 (p = 0.01).

Conclusion:  Access to neurotization differed significantly by patient health insurance and by ADI percentile. Expanding insurance coverage to cover neurotization is needed to increase equitable access and enhance quality of life for patients who come from disadvantaged communities. Our institution's process for preauthorization is outlined to enhance likelihood of insurance approval for neurotization.

下腹穿孔带皮瓣重建术中神经移植的可及性:不公平现象及对预授权的影响。
目的:乳房切除术后常会出现乳房麻醉和麻醉不足,对生活质量造成负面影响。在下腹穿孔深部(DIEP)乳房重建过程中进行神经修复可增强患者的感觉恢复。然而,尚未对 DIEP 重建患者接受神经化治疗的情况进行评估:这项回顾性研究纳入了 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 7 月期间在一家三级医疗学术机构接受 DIEP 乳房重建术的患者。采用双样本 t 检验或卡方分析比较了人口统计学、结果、保险类型和地区贫困指数(ADI):结果:在124名符合标准的患者中,41%的患者的DIEP皮瓣发生了神经化。在吸烟史(29% vs 33%)、糖尿病(14% vs 9.6%)、手术时间(9.43 小时 vs 9.73 小时)、住院时间(3 天 vs 3 天)、再入院率(9.8% vs 6.8%)或再次手术率(12% vs 12%)方面,接受和未接受神经切除的患者没有差异。然而,患者的医疗保险类型不同,接受神经治疗的机会也有显著差异。接受神经治疗的患者的 ADI 百分位数中位数为 40.0,低于未接受神经治疗的患者的 59.0(P=0.01),表明其具有较高的社会经济优势:患者的医疗保险和 ADI 百分位数不同,接受神经治疗的机会也大不相同。有必要扩大医保范围以覆盖神经阻滞治疗,从而为来自贫困社区的患者提供更公平的治疗机会并提高其生活质量。我们概述了本机构的预授权流程,以提高神经治疗获得保险批准的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信