Fractional CO2 Laser Versus Microneedling Combined with Narrowband Ultraviolet and Topical Steroid for Treating Non-Segmental Vitiligo in Treatment-Resistant Localizations: A Comparative Randomized Clinical Trial Study.

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of lasers in medical sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.34172/jlms.2024.38
Parvin Mansouri, Mohammadreza Rahbar, Mohammad Ali Nilforoushzadeh, Mohsen Shati, Mohammad Amir Amirkhani
{"title":"Fractional CO2 Laser Versus Microneedling Combined with Narrowband Ultraviolet and Topical Steroid for Treating Non-Segmental Vitiligo in Treatment-Resistant Localizations: A Comparative Randomized Clinical Trial Study.","authors":"Parvin Mansouri, Mohammadreza Rahbar, Mohammad Ali Nilforoushzadeh, Mohsen Shati, Mohammad Amir Amirkhani","doi":"10.34172/jlms.2024.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Vitiligo poses a significant challenge, particularly in treatment-resistant areas such as acral regions. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combining fractional CO2 laser and microneedling with conventional therapies for non-segmental vitiligo in resistant areas. <b>Methods:</b> A randomized clinical trial with a paired design was conducted on 84 individuals with non-segmental vitiligo and treatment-resistant lesions. Participants in two separate groups received various combinations of interventions, including narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) and topical steroid (Clobetasol ointment) as conventional treatments, with fractional CO2 laser or microneedling as add-ons for four symmetrical treatment-resistant lesions. The treatment duration was 16 weeks, followed by observation until six months post-intervention for each patient, and it focused on assessing the percentage of repigmentation, safety, patient satisfaction, and potential adverse effects. <b>Results:</b> The results of the study revealed a significant difference in average efficacy, with treatments involving fractional CO2 laser and microneedling compared with other interventions without them showing a higher percentage of repigmentation. No notable distinction in repigmentation patterns was observed, except for slightly higher marginal repigmentation with microneedling. Side effects, including pain, burning sensation, and erythema, were more frequent, with no significant difference between the groups. Itching and crusting had a significant difference in the two groups. Patient satisfaction levels were comparable, with the first group slightly more than the second. <b>Conclusion:</b> In conclusion, combining NB-UVB and topical steroid therapies with the fractional CO2 laser or microneedling seems to be effective for vitiligo treatment in resistant areas. Attention to variations in patients' characteristics and specific body locations is necessary when applying these modalities. This study provides valuable insights into novel approaches for managing vitiligo and highlights the potential benefits of these innovative treatments in combination with conventional therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of lasers in medical sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of lasers in medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2024.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Vitiligo poses a significant challenge, particularly in treatment-resistant areas such as acral regions. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combining fractional CO2 laser and microneedling with conventional therapies for non-segmental vitiligo in resistant areas. Methods: A randomized clinical trial with a paired design was conducted on 84 individuals with non-segmental vitiligo and treatment-resistant lesions. Participants in two separate groups received various combinations of interventions, including narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) and topical steroid (Clobetasol ointment) as conventional treatments, with fractional CO2 laser or microneedling as add-ons for four symmetrical treatment-resistant lesions. The treatment duration was 16 weeks, followed by observation until six months post-intervention for each patient, and it focused on assessing the percentage of repigmentation, safety, patient satisfaction, and potential adverse effects. Results: The results of the study revealed a significant difference in average efficacy, with treatments involving fractional CO2 laser and microneedling compared with other interventions without them showing a higher percentage of repigmentation. No notable distinction in repigmentation patterns was observed, except for slightly higher marginal repigmentation with microneedling. Side effects, including pain, burning sensation, and erythema, were more frequent, with no significant difference between the groups. Itching and crusting had a significant difference in the two groups. Patient satisfaction levels were comparable, with the first group slightly more than the second. Conclusion: In conclusion, combining NB-UVB and topical steroid therapies with the fractional CO2 laser or microneedling seems to be effective for vitiligo treatment in resistant areas. Attention to variations in patients' characteristics and specific body locations is necessary when applying these modalities. This study provides valuable insights into novel approaches for managing vitiligo and highlights the potential benefits of these innovative treatments in combination with conventional therapy.

二氧化碳点阵激光与微针联合窄带紫外线和外用类固醇激素治疗难治性非节段性白癜风:随机临床试验对比研究。
简介白癜风是一项重大挑战,尤其是对治疗有耐药性的部位,如痤疮区。本研究旨在评估二氧化碳点阵激光和微针疗法与传统疗法相结合治疗耐药性区域非节段性白癜风的有效性和安全性。研究方法对84名患有非节段性白癜风且皮损呈耐药性的患者进行了配对随机临床试验。两组参与者分别接受不同组合的干预治疗,包括窄带紫外线 B(NB-UVB)和外用类固醇(氯倍他索软膏)作为常规治疗,以及点阵 CO2 激光或微针术作为附加治疗,用于治疗四个对称的耐药性皮损。每位患者的治疗时间为 16 周,随后观察至干预后 6 个月,重点评估再色素沉着的百分比、安全性、患者满意度和潜在的不良反应。研究结果研究结果表明,平均疗效有显著差异,与其他不使用二氧化碳点阵激光和微针疗法的干预相比,使用二氧化碳点阵激光和微针疗法的患者色素沉着的比例更高。除了微针疗法的边缘色素沉着略高外,没有观察到明显的色素沉着模式差异。疼痛、灼烧感和红斑等副作用的发生率较高,但组间差异不大。瘙痒和结痂在两组中差异显著。患者的满意度相当,第一组略高于第二组。结论总之,将 NB-UVB 和局部类固醇疗法与点阵 CO2 激光或微针术相结合,似乎对治疗耐受性区域的白癜风有效。在应用这些方法时,有必要注意患者特征和特定身体部位的差异。这项研究为治疗白癜风的新方法提供了宝贵的见解,并强调了这些创新疗法与传统疗法相结合的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of lasers in medical sciences
Journal of lasers in medical sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences " is a scientific quarterly publication of the Laser Application in Medical Sciences Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. This journal received a scientific and research rank from the national medical publication committee. This Journal accepts original papers, review articles, case reports, brief reports, case series, photo assays, letters to the editor, and commentaries in the field of laser, or light in any fields of medicine such as the following medical specialties: -Dermatology -General and Vascular Surgery -Oncology -Cardiology -Dentistry -Urology -Rehabilitation -Ophthalmology -Otorhinolaryngology -Gynecology & Obstetrics -Internal Medicine -Orthopedics -Neurosurgery -Radiology -Pain Medicine (Algology) -Basic Sciences (Stem cell, Cellular and Molecular application and physic)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信