Median effective dose of spinal ropivacaine in combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for emergency cesarean delivery following failed vaginal delivery with epidural labor analgesia: a single-blind, sequential dose-finding study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yu Wei, Shanshan Ye, Rui Ma, Tao Xu
{"title":"Median effective dose of spinal ropivacaine in combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for emergency cesarean delivery following failed vaginal delivery with epidural labor analgesia: a single-blind, sequential dose-finding study.","authors":"Yu Wei, Shanshan Ye, Rui Ma, Tao Xu","doi":"10.1007/s00540-024-03393-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to estimate the median effective dose of intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine without opioid required for adequate cesarean delivery anesthesia after epidural labor analgesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 20-40 years with American Society of Anesthesiology scores of I-II, body mass index ≤ 36, who underwent emergency cesarean delivery after failed vaginal delivery with epidural analgesia of a duration ≤ 6 h were included in the study. After removal of the epidural used for labor analgesia, a new combined spinal epidural was performed, and a dose of intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine without opioid was administered. The dose was determined using up-down methodology, with the starting patient's dose set to 12 mg. Adequate anesthesia, defined as a pinprick level no lower than T6 at 5 min after ropivacaine administration, resulted in the next patient receiving a dose of ropivacaine 1 mg higher, and inadequate anesthesia 1 mg lower. The primary outcome was the median (95% confidence interval (CI)) dose of spinal ropivacaine required for adequate cesarean delivery anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 46 patients included in the study, 40 were analyzed. The median spinal ropivacaine dose was 8.11 mg (95% CI 7.29-8.93 mg) by the Dixon and Mood method and 8.06 mg (95% CI 6.93-9.00 mg) by isotonic regression. Two patients had high spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that for 50% of patients undergoing cesarean delivery after failed vaginal delivery with epidural analgesia, an 8-mg spinal dose of isobaric ropivacaine without opioid provides an anesthesia level no lower than T6 at 5 min.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03393-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to estimate the median effective dose of intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine without opioid required for adequate cesarean delivery anesthesia after epidural labor analgesia.

Methods: Patients aged 20-40 years with American Society of Anesthesiology scores of I-II, body mass index ≤ 36, who underwent emergency cesarean delivery after failed vaginal delivery with epidural analgesia of a duration ≤ 6 h were included in the study. After removal of the epidural used for labor analgesia, a new combined spinal epidural was performed, and a dose of intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine without opioid was administered. The dose was determined using up-down methodology, with the starting patient's dose set to 12 mg. Adequate anesthesia, defined as a pinprick level no lower than T6 at 5 min after ropivacaine administration, resulted in the next patient receiving a dose of ropivacaine 1 mg higher, and inadequate anesthesia 1 mg lower. The primary outcome was the median (95% confidence interval (CI)) dose of spinal ropivacaine required for adequate cesarean delivery anesthesia.

Results: Of the 46 patients included in the study, 40 were analyzed. The median spinal ropivacaine dose was 8.11 mg (95% CI 7.29-8.93 mg) by the Dixon and Mood method and 8.06 mg (95% CI 6.93-9.00 mg) by isotonic regression. Two patients had high spinal anesthesia.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that for 50% of patients undergoing cesarean delivery after failed vaginal delivery with epidural analgesia, an 8-mg spinal dose of isobaric ropivacaine without opioid provides an anesthesia level no lower than T6 at 5 min.

Abstract Image

在硬膜外分娩镇痛阴道分娩失败后进行紧急剖宫产的脊髓和硬膜外联合麻醉中,脊髓罗哌卡因的中位有效剂量:一项单盲、顺序剂量摸底研究。
目的:本研究旨在估算硬膜外分娩镇痛后进行充分剖宫产麻醉所需的鞘内异位罗哌卡因(不含阿片类药物)的中位有效剂量:研究对象: 年龄在20-40岁之间,美国麻醉学会评分为I-II级,体重指数≤36,阴道分娩失败后进行紧急剖宫产的患者,硬膜外镇痛持续时间≤6小时。在去除用于分娩镇痛的硬膜外麻醉后,进行新的联合脊髓硬膜外麻醉,并给予不含阿片类药物的鞘内等压罗哌卡因剂量。剂量采用上-下法确定,患者的起始剂量设定为 12 毫克。麻醉充分的定义是在给予罗哌卡因 5 分钟后针刺水平不低于 T6,则下一位患者接受的罗哌卡因剂量增加 1 毫克,麻醉不充分的患者接受的剂量减少 1 毫克。主要结果是充分的剖宫产麻醉所需的脊髓罗哌卡因剂量中位数(95% 置信区间(CI)):结果:在纳入研究的 46 名患者中,有 40 人接受了分析。根据 Dixon 和 Mood 法,脊髓罗哌卡因剂量中位数为 8.11 毫克(95% CI 7.29-8.93 毫克),根据等渗回归法,中位数为 8.06 毫克(95% CI 6.93-9.00 毫克)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,对于 50%的患者来说,脊髓麻醉的剂量过高:我们的研究结果表明,对于50%经硬膜外镇痛阴道分娩失败后进行剖宫产的患者来说,不使用阿片类药物的8毫克等压罗哌卡因脊髓剂量可在5分钟内提供不低于T6的麻醉水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia
Journal of Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. This journal publishes original articles, review articles, special articles, clinical reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and book and multimedia reviews. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts devoted to anesthesia and related topics from any country of the world. Membership in the Society is not a prerequisite. The Journal of Anesthesia (JA) welcomes case reports that show unique cases in perioperative medicine, intensive care, emergency medicine, and pain management.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信