Effect of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone combination on mortality in septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Jheng-Yen Wu, Mei-Yuan Liu, Ting-Hui Liu, Po-Yu Huang, Mita Restinia, Wan-Hsuan Hsu, Ya-Wen Tsai, Min-Hsiang Chuang, Kuo-Chuan Hung, Chih-Cheng Lai
{"title":"Effect of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone combination on mortality in septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jheng-Yen Wu, Mei-Yuan Liu, Ting-Hui Liu, Po-Yu Huang, Mita Restinia, Wan-Hsuan Hsu, Ya-Wen Tsai, Min-Hsiang Chuang, Kuo-Chuan Hung, Chih-Cheng Lai","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02381-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the effect of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone combination therapy on the mortality of patients with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and other databases for articles published until October 1, 2023. Only clinical studies that assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone therapy for the treatment of septic shock were included. The primary outcome was the in-hospital mortality rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies with a total of 90, 756 patients were included. The study group exhibited lower in-hospital mortality rates (40.8% vs. 42.8%; OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.92). Compared to the control group, the study group also had lower intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95), 28-day mortality (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72-1.00), 90-day mortality (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.71-1.01), 180-day mortality (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.90), and one-year mortality (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.42-1.16). Subgroup analyses showed a similar trend, particularly prominent in the pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials, multicenter studies, and ICU patients, the study drug regimen involved hydrocortisone at a dose of 50 mg every 6 h in combination with fludrocortisone at 50 µg daily, with the control group receiving either placebo or standard care. Hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone also increased vasopressor-free days and reduced vasopressor duration, without elevating the risk of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study emphasizes the potential survival benefits of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone combination therapy for patients with septic shock and its additional advantages, including reduced vasopressor use.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02381-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study assessed the effect of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone combination therapy on the mortality of patients with septic shock.

Methods: A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and other databases for articles published until October 1, 2023. Only clinical studies that assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone therapy for the treatment of septic shock were included. The primary outcome was the in-hospital mortality rate.

Results: Seven studies with a total of 90, 756 patients were included. The study group exhibited lower in-hospital mortality rates (40.8% vs. 42.8%; OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.92). Compared to the control group, the study group also had lower intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95), 28-day mortality (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72-1.00), 90-day mortality (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.71-1.01), 180-day mortality (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.90), and one-year mortality (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.42-1.16). Subgroup analyses showed a similar trend, particularly prominent in the pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials, multicenter studies, and ICU patients, the study drug regimen involved hydrocortisone at a dose of 50 mg every 6 h in combination with fludrocortisone at 50 µg daily, with the control group receiving either placebo or standard care. Hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone also increased vasopressor-free days and reduced vasopressor duration, without elevating the risk of adverse events.

Conclusions: This study emphasizes the potential survival benefits of hydrocortisone-fludrocortisone combination therapy for patients with septic shock and its additional advantages, including reduced vasopressor use.

Abstract Image

氢化可的松-氟氢可的松联合用药对脓毒性休克死亡率的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:本研究评估了氢化可的松-氟氢可的松联合疗法对脓毒性休克患者死亡率的影响:本研究评估了氢化可的松-氟氢可的松联合疗法对脓毒性休克患者死亡率的影响:使用 Medline、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、ClinicalTrials.gov 和其他数据库对 2023 年 10 月 1 日前发表的文章进行了文献检索。仅纳入了评估氢化可的松-氟氢可的松疗法治疗脓毒性休克的临床疗效和安全性的临床研究。主要结果为院内死亡率:结果:共纳入七项研究,90 756 例患者。研究组的院内死亡率较低(40.8% 对 42.8%;OR,0.86;95% CI,0.80-0.92)。与对照组相比,研究组的重症监护室(ICU)死亡率(OR,0.77;95% CI,0.63-0.95)、28 天死亡率(OR,0.85;95% CI,0.72-1.00)、90 天死亡率(OR,0.85;95% CI,0.71-1.01)、180 天死亡率(OR,0.82;95% CI,0.68-0.90)和一年死亡率(OR,0.70;95% CI,0.42-1.16)也更低。分组分析显示了类似的趋势,在随机临床试验、多中心研究和重症监护室患者的汇总分析中尤为突出,研究药物方案包括每 6 小时 50 毫克剂量的氢化可的松和每天 50 微克剂量的氟氢可的松,对照组接受安慰剂或标准护理。氢化可的松-氟氢可的松还增加了无血管加压天数,缩短了血管加压持续时间,但不会增加不良事件的风险:本研究强调了氢化可的松-氟氢可的松联合疗法对脓毒性休克患者的潜在生存益处及其额外优势,包括减少血管加压器的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信