Real-world applicability of differentiated thyroid cancer guidelines.

Abstract

Objective: Thyroid cancer (TC) is the most common endocrine malignancy with constantly growing incidence. Radioiodine ablation is a safe and effective method for managing TC. Recently various Guidelines (GL) have been published on whom should be ablated, when and under which circumstances. Our study compares 6 GL with a given patient cohort. Additionally, we evaluated each GL's quality via an independent tool.

Material and methods: We compared six Guidelines (GL) for TC ablation on a cohort of 336 patients, implementing GL retrospectively: 2009 and 2016 American Thyroid Association (ATA), European Thyroid Association's (ETA) Consensus Statement, UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), German position paper from Surgery and Nuclear Medicine (German) and European Association of Nuclear Medicine and Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Image (EANM/SNMMI). Quality assessment was conducted using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation instrument II (AGREE II).

Results: Results showed significant variability among GL. American Thyroid Association 2016, a clear improvement of the ATA 2009, presents a large grey area of "probable ablation candidates". European Thyroid Association and NICE agree that only a small portion of our ablated patients would benefit from it and the AGREE II tool shows a lack of applicability, but very good scores elsewhere. German and EANM/SNMMI GL agree that most of our clinical decisions to ablate were correct and their AGREE II scores are the highest in all six domains.

Conclusion: Considering that dynamic risk classification plays a major role in determining the most appropriate treatment, it appears that the guidelines should be updated in order to support individualized patient management. However, it is the experience of the individual physician that will determine the final decision.