Sedation and analgesia in the trauma intensive care unit of Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital - the effect of anti-retroviral therapy: A retrospective chart analysis.
{"title":"Sedation and analgesia in the trauma intensive care unit of Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital - the effect of anti-retroviral therapy: A retrospective chart analysis.","authors":"O G Mngoma, T C Hardcastle, K De Vasconcellos","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02639-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adequate access to antiretrovirals (ARV) has improved the longevity and quality of life of people living with the human immunodeficiency virus(HIV). Antiretrovirals are known to cause multiple drug-drug interactions. It was noted clinically that patients on ARVs appeared to be more difficult to sedate. This begs the question of the clinical impact of these drug interactions, should clinicians adjust sedative dosages when managing patients on ARVs? This study aimed to investigate the presence of and measure the differences in sedation and analgesic utilisation between polytrauma patients on ARVs and those not on ARVs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational chart review included consecutive adult polytrauma patients admitted to the Trauma ICU IALCH between January 2016 and December 2019. HIV status and ARV use was documented. The total sedation per drug utilised at 24, 48 and 72-hour interval was calculated and tabulated accordingly. Drug utilisation was compared to ARV status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 216 adult polytrauma patients were included in the study. A total of 44 patients were HIV positive and 172 were HIV negative. Of the HIV positive patients 41 (93.2%) were on ARVs. Multiple comparisons were confirmed, however the primary analysis compared HIV negative patients with HIV positive patients on ARV. Total morphine, ketamine, midazolam and propofol doses were all numerically greater in patients on ARVs, although none of these reached statistical significance. The use of morphine rescue boluses during the first 72 h of ICU admission and the doses of ketamine and propofol on ICU day 3 were significantly greater in those on ARVs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data analysis showed that patients on ARVs required higher doses of some analgesia and sedation in ICU and lower doses of midazolam. This needs to be considered when sedating patients in a setting with a high HIV prevalence.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2501-2508"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02639-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Adequate access to antiretrovirals (ARV) has improved the longevity and quality of life of people living with the human immunodeficiency virus(HIV). Antiretrovirals are known to cause multiple drug-drug interactions. It was noted clinically that patients on ARVs appeared to be more difficult to sedate. This begs the question of the clinical impact of these drug interactions, should clinicians adjust sedative dosages when managing patients on ARVs? This study aimed to investigate the presence of and measure the differences in sedation and analgesic utilisation between polytrauma patients on ARVs and those not on ARVs.
Methods: This retrospective observational chart review included consecutive adult polytrauma patients admitted to the Trauma ICU IALCH between January 2016 and December 2019. HIV status and ARV use was documented. The total sedation per drug utilised at 24, 48 and 72-hour interval was calculated and tabulated accordingly. Drug utilisation was compared to ARV status.
Results: A total of 216 adult polytrauma patients were included in the study. A total of 44 patients were HIV positive and 172 were HIV negative. Of the HIV positive patients 41 (93.2%) were on ARVs. Multiple comparisons were confirmed, however the primary analysis compared HIV negative patients with HIV positive patients on ARV. Total morphine, ketamine, midazolam and propofol doses were all numerically greater in patients on ARVs, although none of these reached statistical significance. The use of morphine rescue boluses during the first 72 h of ICU admission and the doses of ketamine and propofol on ICU day 3 were significantly greater in those on ARVs.
Conclusion: The data analysis showed that patients on ARVs required higher doses of some analgesia and sedation in ICU and lower doses of midazolam. This needs to be considered when sedating patients in a setting with a high HIV prevalence.
Inkosi Albert Luthuli 中心医院创伤重症监护室的镇静与镇痛--抗逆转录病毒疗法的影响:回顾性图表分析。
目的:抗逆转录病毒药物(ARV)的充分供应提高了人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者的寿命和生活质量。众所周知,抗逆转录病毒药物会引起多种药物之间的相互作用。临床注意到,服用抗逆转录病毒药物的患者似乎更难镇静。这就引出了一个问题:这些药物相互作用会对临床产生什么影响?在管理服用抗逆转录病毒药物的患者时,临床医生是否应该调整镇静剂的剂量?本研究旨在调查服用抗逆转录病毒药物和未服用抗逆转录病毒药物的多发性创伤患者之间是否存在镇静和镇痛药使用差异,并对其进行测量:这项回顾性观察病历审查纳入了2016年1月至2019年12月期间入住亚利桑那州立医院创伤重症监护室的连续成人多发性创伤患者。记录了艾滋病毒感染状况和抗逆转录病毒药物的使用情况。计算了每种药物在 24、48 和 72 小时间隔内的总镇静剂使用量,并将其制成表格。将药物使用情况与抗逆转录病毒药物使用情况进行比较:研究共纳入了 216 名成人多发性创伤患者。共有 44 名患者 HIV 阳性,172 名患者 HIV 阴性。在 HIV 阳性患者中,有 41 人(93.2%)使用抗逆转录病毒药物。多重比较得到了证实,但主要分析是将 HIV 阴性患者与使用抗逆转录病毒药物的 HIV 阳性患者进行比较。使用抗逆转录病毒药物的患者的吗啡、氯胺酮、咪达唑仑和丙泊酚总剂量在数量上都更大,但均未达到统计学意义。使用抗逆转录病毒药物的患者在进入重症监护室的前72小时内使用吗啡抢救栓的剂量以及在重症监护室第3天使用氯胺酮和异丙酚的剂量都明显增加:数据分析显示,服用抗逆转录病毒药物的患者在重症监护室需要更高的镇痛和镇静剂量,而咪达唑仑的剂量较低。在艾滋病病毒感染率较高的环境中为患者镇静时需要考虑到这一点。
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries.
Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.