Randomized Clinical Trial of Electrostimulation Therapies as an Adjuvant for the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Claudia I Rodríguez, Fernando Angeles, Socorro A Borges, Eduardo Llamosas, Julio Morales
{"title":"Randomized Clinical Trial of Electrostimulation Therapies as an Adjuvant for the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders.","authors":"Claudia I Rodríguez, Fernando Angeles, Socorro A Borges, Eduardo Llamosas, Julio Morales","doi":"10.3390/dj12080273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We carried out a comparison of the neuromuscular and clinical effects produced by electrostimulation therapies, as an adjuvant to the use of occlusal splints (removable muscle relaxation apparatus) in patients with temporomandibular disorders In this simple randomized clinical trial, 91 patients were randomly divided into three groups. Group A (GA) received transcutaneous electrostimulation therapy and an occlusal splint, Group B (GB) received percutaneous electrostimulation therapy and an occlusal splint, and Group C (GC) received an occlusal splint. The neuromuscular activity, as well as the signs and symptoms of each patient, were evaluated every week throughout the treatment (T0 = baseline; T1 = 7 days; T2 = 14 days; T3 = 21 days; T4 = 28 days; and T5 = 35 days). Pain was measured with a visual analog scale, and neuromuscular electrical activity was determined by the root mean square of the masseter muscles through the use of a UNAM-CINVESTAV 1.2 electromyograph. Comparisons were made using ANOVA for repeated measures (<i>p</i>-value = 0.05). The comparison between the groups determined that muscle fatigue (<i>p</i>-value = 0.001), joint pain (<i>p</i>-value = 0.009), and muscle pain (<i>p</i>-value = 0.003) decreased to a greater extent, and in the short term for the group treated with transcutaneous electrostimulation therapy as an adjuvant to the use of the occlusal splint. The comparison between the groups determined that muscle fatigue (<i>p</i>-value = 0.001), joint pain (<i>p</i>-value = 0.009), and muscle pain (<i>p</i>-value = 0.003) decreased to a greater extent and in a shorter term in the GA (calculation therapy, transcutaneous electrostimulation) and GB (occlusal splint). Transcutaneous electrostimulation is a feasible and faster alternative that was accepted by most of the patients for treating temporomandibular disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"12 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11353119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12080273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We carried out a comparison of the neuromuscular and clinical effects produced by electrostimulation therapies, as an adjuvant to the use of occlusal splints (removable muscle relaxation apparatus) in patients with temporomandibular disorders In this simple randomized clinical trial, 91 patients were randomly divided into three groups. Group A (GA) received transcutaneous electrostimulation therapy and an occlusal splint, Group B (GB) received percutaneous electrostimulation therapy and an occlusal splint, and Group C (GC) received an occlusal splint. The neuromuscular activity, as well as the signs and symptoms of each patient, were evaluated every week throughout the treatment (T0 = baseline; T1 = 7 days; T2 = 14 days; T3 = 21 days; T4 = 28 days; and T5 = 35 days). Pain was measured with a visual analog scale, and neuromuscular electrical activity was determined by the root mean square of the masseter muscles through the use of a UNAM-CINVESTAV 1.2 electromyograph. Comparisons were made using ANOVA for repeated measures (p-value = 0.05). The comparison between the groups determined that muscle fatigue (p-value = 0.001), joint pain (p-value = 0.009), and muscle pain (p-value = 0.003) decreased to a greater extent, and in the short term for the group treated with transcutaneous electrostimulation therapy as an adjuvant to the use of the occlusal splint. The comparison between the groups determined that muscle fatigue (p-value = 0.001), joint pain (p-value = 0.009), and muscle pain (p-value = 0.003) decreased to a greater extent and in a shorter term in the GA (calculation therapy, transcutaneous electrostimulation) and GB (occlusal splint). Transcutaneous electrostimulation is a feasible and faster alternative that was accepted by most of the patients for treating temporomandibular disorders.

将电刺激疗法作为治疗颞下颌关节紊乱的辅助手段的随机临床试验。
在这项简单的随机临床试验中,我们将 91 名患者随机分为三组,A 组(GA)接受经皮电刺激疗法和咬合夹板,B 组(GB)接受经皮电刺激疗法和咬合夹板,C 组(GA)接受经皮电刺激疗法和咬合夹板。A 组(GA)接受经皮电刺激疗法和咬合夹板,B 组(GB)接受经皮电刺激疗法和咬合夹板,C 组(GC)接受咬合夹板。在整个治疗过程中,每周对每位患者的神经肌肉活动以及体征和症状进行评估(T0 = 基线;T1 = 7 天;T2 = 14 天;T3 = 21 天;T4 = 28 天;T5 = 35 天)。疼痛用视觉模拟量表测量,神经肌肉电活动通过使用 UNAM-CINVESTAV 1.2 肌电图机测量颌下肌的均方根来确定。采用方差分析进行重复测量比较(P 值 = 0.05)。组间比较结果表明,使用经皮电刺激疗法作为咬合夹板辅助治疗的组,肌肉疲劳(p 值 = 0.001)、关节疼痛(p 值 = 0.009)和肌肉疼痛(p 值 = 0.003)在短期内减轻的程度更大。通过组间比较发现,GA 组(计算疗法、经皮电刺激疗法)和 GB 组(咬合夹板)的肌肉疲劳(p 值 = 0.001)、关节疼痛(p 值 = 0.009)和肌肉疼痛(p 值 = 0.003)减轻的程度更大,时间更短。经皮电刺激疗法是治疗颞下颌关节紊乱的一种可行且快速的替代方法,被大多数患者所接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信